Today Sun Mon
It is forcast to be Mostly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Mostly Cloudy
27°/17°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 27, 2012
Chance of Rain
26°/20°
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 28, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
32°/20°

41 Comments

news

Prorogue Protest Draws Out the Chattering Masses

Stephen Harper seems to have torn a page right out of the GOP’s strategy guidebook. For a government that came to power promising a “stronger Canada,” the minority Conservatives have had no problem sowing perceptions of class divide, framing dissent as “elitist” while quiet acquiescence—the supposed political hallmark of “ordinary” Canadians—is the stuff of true patriotism.
Now, as the government tightens its grip, every dirty trick from that guidebook is spilling into play. In the weeks after Parliament’s suspension, Harper’s caucus brushed aside the mounting outrage, dismissing it as trivial. Perhaps an issue for urban “elites,” in their view, but ultimately unimportant to the great, silent majority of Canadians—red states painted Tory blue. “[Prorogation] may not be what the chattering classes want,” opined Tony Clement, minister of Industry, “but we’re not here to govern on behalf of the chattering classes.”
Wedged between Clement’s words, no doubt reflecting the party line, is an ominous autocratic hubris, toxic to the open, represented society Harper once claimed to champion. Indeed, having again denied Canadians a voice in Parliament, the true constituency of the Conservative Party of Canada is shrinking to a handful of exclusive demographics and interests, a base whose membership makes Tory accusations of elitism outright laughable. The rest of the country, chattering or not, “should be even more concerned about Stephen Harper’s decision to prorogue Parliament for the second time in a year,” writes Irene Mathyssen, the NDP’s member of parliament for London-Fanshawe, “as the latest act of a government that is increasingly unaccountable and dictatorial.” And if a month’s rallying on Facebook is any indication, Canadians—both rural and urban, shattering perceptions of class-based indolence—have moved past concern, choosing action instead.
On Saturday, Torontonians joined cities and towns from coast to coast to coast, amassing by the thousands to remind Stephen Harper of his own words from April 18, 2005: “When a government starts trying to cancel dissent or avoid dissent is frankly when it’s rapidly losing its moral authority to govern.”
Torontoist will have more coverage of the protest soon.
Photos by Miles Storey/Torontoist.

Comments

  • http://undefined Matt

    There will be endless debate over how offensive the prorogue actually is to our democracy. Some claim it’s routine and has been done well over a hundred times before (which is true) while others will contest it is being used to avoid facing the music (also true). Both sides can debate this particular prorogue forever, but the prorogue isn’t actually the point anymore. The point is that the Left has finally found ‘something’ to rally around and get riled up about. You can credit this to either well-played politics from the Conservative war room or to general voter apathy – it doesn’t matter. That ‘something’ is profound enough that NDPs and Greens are willing to march alongside Liberals and even red Tories.
    We have an issue to rally around – now we just need the leadership. The 2010 Prorogue protests are in danger of going the way of the 2009 Coalition protests (a.k.a. extinct) unless a leader with balls is willing to step up to the plate and swing for the fences. I think the question on everyone’s mind is: is it time to bring on the election and take on the Conservative war room?

  • http://undefined David Toronto

    I find the term “chattering masses” offensive.
    How could you undermine a valid democratic endeavour
    with such an elitist term?

  • http://undefined bigdaddyhame

    I agree. The correct term is “twittering masses.”

  • http://undefined Peter K

    Wow, you had the organizational power of at least two political parties, countless special interest and poverty industry groups, and the left wing Toronto media and this is all you could muster for a turnout? Pretty pathetic.
    It just proves what everyone’s been saying all along: NOBODY CARES.

  • http://undefined mark.

    How many people were there? How many would it have taken for you to not call it “pathetic”?

  • rek

    Harper has nothing but contempt for democracy, and no interest in governing people who disagree with him.

  • rek

    “this is all you could muster for a turnout?”
    Looks like a lot to me.

  • http://undefined CaligulaJones

    I think that Bob Rae set the all time World Record for Hypocrisy by showing up. You know, the same Bob Rae who prorogued the Ontario Legislature three times.
    I guess that was different…

  • http://undefined Peter K

    You don’t see any high angle shots. That means they are trying to disguise the fact that the crowd is a mile wide and an inch deep.
    Mike Harris used to draw 50,000-100,000 to a protest. This can’t be more than 1,500 or so. Maybe if the held it on a weekday and paid union members to show up they may have had a decent turn out. As is stands this was sad.
    If this looks like a lot of people to you, you really need to get out more.

  • http://undefined Peter K

    That’s right. He was doing it because he believed in social justice…whatever the hell that means.

  • http://undefined rich1299

    Considering that it was held on a cold day in January it was definitely a very large turnout for something the Harper Cons were hoping no one would care about. When I first heard about the possibility Harper might prorogue parliament I believed that would mark the beginning of his end as PM, seeing the numbers from yesterday just confirmed that belief for me, I don’t see how Harper can recover from this, he’ll certainly never be able to gain a majority now just a few short months after it looked like he very well might. After seeing how many ex Harrisites were in the new Con party I figured they would go the way of Harris in Ontario, luckily they never got a majority so the damage they’ve done has been minimized. I hope we don’t have a spring election, though I want to see Harper gone asap, because I want to hear from the committee looking into the allegations that the Harper Cons broke international law by handing over prisoners knowing they were going to be tortured. Hiding from that committee was what this proroguation was all about anyways so I think Canadians deserve to hear the truth finally.

  • http://www.guesswork.ca Patrick Metzger

    I don’t think the prorogation poses any threat to what passes for democracy in this country, particularly in a minority government situation. However it’s pretty obnoxious for Harper to claim that that they’re too busy doing their job to do their job.

  • http://undefined rich1299

    I think this issue will definitely help get out the vote opposed to the Harper Cons in the next election, I think people are starting to realize the threat that someone who only cares about clinging to power can do to our democratic institutions and international reputation.

  • http://undefined rich1299

    When used properly it is of no risk whatsoever to democracy but when used to avoid accountability it is and does damage our democracy, accountability is one of the cornerstones of our democracy as is the citizens representation in Parliament. If Harper faces no serious consequences for doing this then other PMs will do so as well and the ability to avoid accountability or to avoid facing the people’s representative’s in Parliament will become a regular feature of our democracy much weakening it in the process.

  • http://undefined oxygensmith

    No Peter K, as a matter of fact, CAPP doesn’t have the “organizational power” of two political parties combined, and absolutely no NGO support (for reasons that mystify me, actually— I would suspect its minimal in some cities at best). And a majority of everyone involved, even at the planning level, had never done anything like this.
    Anyone who was expecting a quarter-million turnout was buying into the major media hype around CAPP, where it’s easier to file a story about Facebook than the complexities of a democratic movement. But like any other social movement, it starts small and gets bigger— if people can learn to organize in such a short time. So, we have to have an organized face-to-face component that matches the online organizing efforts.

  • http://undefined oxygensmith

    I’d just like to set the record straight here about CAPP participants: absolutely everyone I talked to in our planning meetings, and at the rally, is quite aware that prorogue has happened before (under Liberal governments).
    The accusation that CAPP participants don’t know our history is simply the spin of Harper and his defenders, who don’t know any of us, and would never condescend to speak to any of us, because of course, anyone who isn’t far right is “the enemy” and isn’t worth talking to.
    In fact, what also built the CAPP movement is that prorogue for cynical political reasons has happened before, so the Liberal government of the time could avoid the full impact of the Gomery judgement. CAPP was sparked by most of us seeing a pattern that is getting worse. With Harper, we have the “innovation” of a $130000000 prorogue that blows away all the work on legislation of the past year. Also, Harper gets to run around “telling us how it is” through the media rather than dealing with Parliament democratically. That’s what’s new.
    And of course, Harper will have the gall to introduce all of these spending cuts after Parliament reconvenes.
    That’s why a number of CAPP members are in informal working groups studying legislation and/or guidelines to the GG around reforming prorogue, rather than devoting their energy to another political party.
    I’m not surprised that Harperites will continue pretending that we don’t know our Liberal/prorogue history, though. Their attacks on CAPP are like their defense of the prorogue: totally baseless.

  • http://undefined Darren

    Im with Peter on this. Where were you guys when the opposition parties teamed with the Bloq to form a coalition that no one voted for???

  • http://www.guesswork.ca Patrick Metzger

    Accountability comes at the ballot box. However, the current opposition parties are so lacklustre that Harper could probably skate down the Rideau Canal naked carrying a bag of severed heads without losing control of the government.

  • http://undefined John Duncan

    Actually Darren, every single one of those Bloc, NDP and Liberal MPs who might have formed a coalition were voted for by their constituents. And that’s a lot more Canadians than voted for Tory MPs.
    Maybe it’s time you read up on the basic functioning of parliamentary democracy, as you don’t seem to understand it all…

  • Darren

    Oh. Im sure a lot of people voted for the individual MPs, but no one voted for a LIb/NDP/Bloq coalition. But as usual; Harper is bad, so anyone but Harper. Correct?

  • http://undefined K At

    I was at a pro Coalition demonstration, thanks for asking.

  • http://undefined K At

    There are a couple of crucial differences.
    The unions were active in bringing those crowds. Regardless of the spin, that was definitely not the case with this protest. Everyone came on their own and the prevailing tone was non-partisan. Everyone involved in it was and is very aware of that fact.
    As well, most people protested in their local ridings so instead of one massive protest, there were many people out right across the country.
    I can also tell you that many if not most of those people were first-time at any kind of demo and all were quite obviously very pleased with how it went.
    Expect more next time – so much negative trolling is only making people more angry and determined.

  • http://undefined K At

    As well, Harper has publicly mused about proroguing every year. Essentially that would put an expiry date on legislation. Whether you like that specific idea or not, clearly it is another instance of Harper attempting to curtail debate and dissent.

  • http://undefined Peter K

    It was anything but non-partisan. Many sign carried NDP colours and those parties were actively trying to drive turnout. Bob Rae was there for god’s sake. Give your head a shake. Non-partisan my ass.
    In the end it was a bunch of social activists, folks who rely on the poverty industry, and other people who never voted for Harper telling us they won’t vote for him next time. It means nothing in the real world.

  • http://undefined mark.

    Darren: “Im with Peter on this. Where were you guys when the opposition parties teamed with the Bloq to form a coalition that no one voted for???”
    What does that have to do with Peter’s comment? Hint: nothing.

  • http://undefined mark.

    You still haven’t answered my question, Peter.

  • http://undefined mark.

    Why are you just resorting to insulting people, somewhat personally?

  • http://undefined Darren

    Pete pointed outthat even a combined opposition that the numbers were poor. A combined oppostion shows hatred and ideology just like the supposed coalition that no one voted for.

  • http://undefined Darren

    Because its the same as the anti-poverty protests in TO.They bring out the bottom of the barrel people with too much time on their hand.

  • http://undefined Peter K

    Truth stings doesn’t it? The fact of the matter is, few if any of these people would even consider voting Conservative, so this rally amounts to little more than a Michael Ignatieff/Jack Layton campaign event.

  • http://undefined rek

    The first link I posted up-thread was from a rooftop, showing what looks like at least 3-4,000 in the few seconds of video.
    The second was several minutes long, of the protest streaming by.

  • http://undefined rek

    I supported the coalition. I liked the idea that the prime minister would actually represent the majority of Canadians, and would have support from a plurality.

  • Miles Storey

    “You don’t see any high angle shots. That means they are trying to disguise the fact that the crowd is a mile wide and an inch deep.”
    Politely, fuck you.
    I’m not Canadian, and I don’t have a vested or particular interest in one side or the other of federal politics. I don’t take photographs to shore up some agenda you think that I have, a knee-jerk conclusion you came to without knowing the first thing about me.
    I wasn’t there to protest, I was there to take pictures. These are the first seven images I supplied to the editors for this article, there are many more coming in a follow-up article. Expediency was the agenda, not political bullshit.
    So yeah, thanks for blindly judging me Peter, and accusing me of attempting to deliberately manipulate the facts. Fuck you.

  • http://undefined rek

    I’ve decided he’s a troll, or a deluded Con.

  • http://undefined Darren

    Yeah, because anyone voting fiscally conservative must be insane right??
    A lot of people who last voted for the PCs did so more out of a protest vote then anything else. I was always a left of centre. I grew up in a European country where left of centre pretty much describes all the political parties; ie there is no right. It started first municipally, and bit by bit I realised that I was tired of voting for people like Miller, McGuinty, etc. I dont agree with everyting Harper believes, especially foreign policy, but I think he is less of a tax and spend hypocrite then anyone else in the Federal Liberals or NDP

  • http://undefined Peter K

    Miles is a little touchy. Probably hit a little too close to home.
    Rek seems to like calling the kettle black. He’s one of the biggest trollers on here.

  • http://undefined Peter K

    Miles- It wasn’t a comment on your pictures alone. No media outlets really showed anything different from your pics.
    Rek- We disagree. Get over it. (Although I must admit I love poking Communists in the eye).
    Reports have now been revised down from 10,000-12,000 people to 3,000-5,000. That’s not a lot for a city the size of Toronto. Yeah, you got 0.001% of the population to show up. You earned a gold star.

  • http://undefined Colin

    I wish everyone on both sides would just be honest and admit that this protest has nothing to do with proroguing Parliament. It’s about whether you like or dislike Stephen Harper plain and simple.

  • http://undefined rek

    This isn’t about disagreement, Peter, it’s about you refusing to acknowledge photos and video showing there was more than a few hundred people at the protest. You’re even doing it in the comments of a BlogTO article with video in the article showing you’re wrong. You’re either putting your ideology ahead of reality, which makes you a deluded Con (capital-C, Darren, take note), or you’re trolling.
    And you’re disingenuously confusing conflicting headcounts with revised numbers, as if there’s some sort of official tally somewhere.

  • http://undefined impudent strumpet

    Are these the kinds of pictures you’re looking for?
    More from many different angles before and after it in the same album. I assume credit goes to the person whose photobucket it is, I just found the link on twitter.

  • http://undefined Peter K

    Actually yes. That’s exactly what I wanted to see. It’s a clear shot of nearly the entire crowd and gives a good sense of how many people were there.
    It’s far closer to the 3,000-5,000 estimate than the 10,000-12,000 that was originally put forth. And my assertion stands that it’s far fewer people than one would expect to see if this were truly a mass movement.