Today Thu Fri
It is forcast to be Clear at 11:00 PM EDT on June 19, 2013
Clear
23°/13°
It is forcast to be Clear at 11:00 PM EDT on June 20, 2013
Clear
25°/14°
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on June 21, 2013
Partly Cloudy
25°/16°

12 Comments

news

Polling Booth: Blood Donation by Gay Men


In the late 1980s and early 1990s, Canada was rocked with its worst public health disaster ever: the tainted blood scandal. After being infused with infected blood product, one thousand Canadian Red Cross patients contracted HIV and twenty thousand more were infected with hepatitis C. Even worse, a federal health employee claimed that it was known by the early 1980s that contaminated blood existed within the system.
In the years that followed, the feds instituted a compensation program for infected patients, and the Red Cross was ordered by the Supreme Court to pay seventy-nine million dollars in settlements. The scandal caused the Red Cross (now succeeded by Canadian Blood Services) to establish one of its most controversial policies: any man who had any type of sexual contact—even once—with another man since 1977 was barred from donating blood products.
This policy is not unique to Canadian Blood Services; it’s ubiquitous in blood agencies around the world, despite state-of-the-art tests now employed to screen-out diseased blood. There are also many other conditions that will disqualify potential donors, although the system is only as effective as the applicants are honest. This autumn, however, CBS finally started accepting stem cell donations from gay men. The latest Health Canada guidelines now allow for tissue, cell, and organ donation by gay men, but that change doesn’t apply to blood products. Some say that the screening technology is now effective enough that it doesn’t pose a significant risk to the hundreds of Canadians waiting for donors, and that the policy perpetuates longstanding myths about gay men; others feel that prohibiting gay men from donating is not discriminatory, but simply a matter of public safety and common sense.

Comments

  • http://undefined rek

    I’ve never understood why blood donations aren’t used as another way to test people for various things. Someone is willing to give you their blood, which you want badly, but you don’t want it if they check certain boxes on a form, and you won’t screen the blood anyway if they don’t?

  • http://undefined Green Sulfur

    You’re really doing a poll on whether or not the civil rights of gay men should be respected? Gay is not a disease.

  • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

    IMNSHO this restriction is pretty gay.

  • http://undefined Andrew

    I don’t necessarily agree with the restriction, but can you explain how someone has the “right” to donate blood?

  • http://undefined Marc Lostracco

    Even though the RNA-level tests can detect mere weeks-old HIV infection, I don’t think a reasonable time period between risky behaviour and donation is too out-of-line, but what irks me is that gay men pretty much have a lifetime ban on blood donation, but if you’re a straight guy who bangs a thousand hookers up the pooper, you’re welcome to donate after a year. Let’s have some parity, no?
    I think it’s also important to remind people that not every gay guy engages in anal sex—or even any high-risk sexual behaviour at all—but plenty of straight people do. Being the hetero or lesbian partner of someone who has engaged in high-risk sexual behaviour only classifies as a temporary deferral.
    There are now multiple checks and redundancies in the donated blood supply, and with the blood supply in a state of perpetual scarcity, I wonder if this rule is still maintained to avoid potential lawsuits rather than to serve the public interest.

  • http://undefined Green Sulfur

    No one has the right to donate blood but everyone has the right not to be discriminated against based on their sexuality. See Marc’s straight-guy-with-hookers scenario for reasons why painting only gay men with the disease brush is insanely homophobic.

  • Robert Ruggiero

    What’s even worse, just a few years ago organs were banned too. Shouldn’t this be going the other way?

  • http://undefined ariehsinger

    This question always bothers me, considering there are plenty of strait people who are riskier in their secuality than gay men.
    That being said, this question is still fresh with me, as I donated on Tuesday – and do regularly. The question asks if “you have had sex with a man even once.” – which I think is completely different than not accepting donations from gay males.

  • http://undefined canuck1975

    I’ve pretty come come to the conclusion that if the CBS doesn’t want my blood, they don’t want it. I used to donate blood and lie about my sexual status, but then I realized that I was just buying into the discrimination.
    The CBS will come around, just as they have with stem cells. After a quick chat with my doctor next week about it, I plan on registering.
    It’s that easy to me: CBS, you ask for my blood and I’ll give it. It’s a fight that once was worth fighting, but which we’d lost… might as well just move on.

  • http://undefined davidcreed

    I know one person, very straight, who won’t donate because he find’s the questions too obtrusive. Personally, I just answer them and then donate (platelets).

  • Florence Fielding

    Well we should not have some gender discrimination. Anyone who is willing to help is welcome. In donating blood, i know that there would be a screening test to ensure that the donator would be qualified.

    Florence Fielding,
    Car Donation
    Wheels for Wishes

  • http://www.facebook.com/mk.hernandez1 MK Hernández

    Can you please sign and forward my petition to allow gay men the right to donate blood at http://www.change.org/petitions/u-s-food-and-drug-administration-allow-gay-men-to-donate-blood