Today Wed Thu
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 10:00 PM EST on February 07, 2012
Partly Cloudy
2°/-3°
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 10:00 PM EST on February 08, 2012
Partly Cloudy
3°/-1°
It is forcast to be Clear at 10:00 PM EST on February 09, 2012
Clear
3°/-11°

10 Comments

news

Anything but Crystal Clear

The Royal Ontario Museum’s Michael Lee-Chin Crystal may or may not be one of the ugliest architectural feats known to humankind, but there’s one thing we can all agree on: original, it ain’t.
Las Vegas is usually a bit outside our jurisdiction, but we couldn’t help but do a double-take when the latest super-duper-megaresort (pictured above) opened there last week.
The $8.5-billion CityCenter is billed as the biggest private construction project in U.S. history. Spread across sixty-seven acres, it’s got hotels, casinos (of course), condos, and “Crystals,” a bourgeois mall that looks eerily like Toronto’s custom-made, $250-million landmark museum addition.
Given that the ROM was recently cited as one of the planet’s ugliest buildings by both Virtualtourist.com and the Washington Post, we’re not sure if we should take this personally or not.


We thought the resemblance was a bit weird since, according to architect Daniel Liebeskind’s own website, Toronto’s crystal was “inspired by the ROM’s gem and mineral collection [and he] sketched the concept on paper napkins while attending a family wedding at the ROM.” But when the Star‘s Richard Ouzounian talked to Libeskind last week, Ouzounian posed a rather obvious question: how is it that a Las Vegas mall could, from a presumably different inspiration, end up with the same raison d’être, not to mention the same moniker? Liebeskind’s answer: the name was the owners’ idea.
The Post‘s Philip Kennicott piped in that the ROM is worse than a Wal-Mart in that it “surpasses the ugliness of bland functional buildings by being both ugly and useless.” Ouch. Sticking the knife in, he also says that Vegas’ Crystals “may be one of the architect’s best buildings, as if the shopping mall—not the museum—was the métier he’s been searching for all along.”
Hmmmm. We have to think about that a moment. Is that, like, a backhanded compliment?
Okay, you say. So, it looks the same from the outside. But ours is a museum, this just a mall. It surely can’t contain the same blank, angular interiors that make the new dino exhibit so cool….can it?
Judge for yourself, friend. From where we sit, the hallway outside Louis Vuitton looks just as familiar as the exterior streetscape gracing the Vegas strip.
Now, in fairness, Libeskind likes crystals and that’s okay. He became a full-on starchitect with Berlin’s Jewish Museum, where the zig-zagging, shard-like construction actually conveys something.
When it was announced that he would work on the ROM, we had reason to hope for a lot. While the AGO was touting Frank Gehry‘s childhood connection to the work he was doing there, Libeskind had some Toronto cred of his own: his wife, Nina, is Stephen Lewis’s sister, making him a bona fide black-suit-wearing part of Toronto’s lefty elite.
When the ROM design emerged some thought it was bold and brilliant, while others said it was just him imposing his aesthetic on a historic structure. The original design has a lot more glass and a lot less metal, but few changed their opinions when the thing opened, and that’s fine; if art isn’t a bit controversial, if people aren’t talking about it, what’s the point?
We don’t begrudge artistes the right to explore the same themes over and over again—for John Irving to write about bears and people losing limbs, for Steven Spielberg to make movies about kids and/or aliens, for Snoop Dogg to rap about bein’ a pimp who likes the pot. We’d even expect Frank Gehry to go wild with big, swooping piles of titanium, except that most people agree the reason the AGO works is because he didn’t
Anyway, what we’re really saying to Libeskind is: Come on, man. Build what you’ve gotta build but don’t bullshit a bullshitter.
And he isn’t done with Toronto yet, as the L Tower bumbles along. Will its doppelganger one day dot the skyline of some other burg? Let’s hope not.
All images from CityCenter’s website.

Comments

  • http://undefined Hangten10

    Do all his buildings look the same? Denver Art Museum also comes to mind.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denver_Art_Museum

  • http://undefined adHominem

    The whole “the ROM expansion was inspired by their crystal collection” schtick always struck me as rubbish. His design for the V&A expansion in London predates the ROM design, but it looks damn near identical. You know the old saw about everything looking like a nail to a man with a hammer? Yeah.
    Also, Phil Kennicott is an idiot, and I take a similarly dim view of the recent spate of shameless link-trolling articles declaring the ROM the ugliest thing ever. I can point to half a hundred uglier buildings, and they exist in every city in North America. They’re the stucco boxes and cheap slabs that dot the perimeter of highway off-ramps and the edges of cities, the cumulative effect of which is to deaden the soul. The ROM may or may not be a failure, but at least it’s interesting.

  • http://undefined Karin

    I agree with adHominem. Personally, I love the crystal and it’s uniqueness. I like the way in contrasts the old and the new. People don’t like change or risk taking. It’s an old architectural issue. Nothing new there.

  • http://culturepopped.blogspot.com Popped Culture

    I have never understood the visceral hate many people have for the ROM crystal. It stands out on Bloor, looks amazing and if you like the original building, it’s still there! People in this city cry out for something new and when they get it they bitch and moan.
    So much praise is poured on the opera house and the AGO expansion, mostly because they fit in with what is already there and don’t cause a fuss.

  • http://undefined TokyoTuds

    I’ll reserve my final judgement for when I have seen the interior, because if it fails in its function, it fails completely. The exterior does nothing for me and I feel it is just an artist playing with materials and shapes because he can (and ironically in the end the original materials couldn’t be used). My opinion: I don’t like it at all.

  • http://undefined rich1299

    I actually like the crystal though I’ve never been inside but from the outside its interesting and full of character which are qualities sorely lacking from so much of the architecture in Toronto. I would’ve preferred to see much more glass though but as it is I think it makes the ROM stand out in a way it never did before.

  • http://undefined EricSmith

    Personally, I love the crystal and its uniqueness.

    It was never unique.

    When it comes to love of deliberately wacky buildings, I have to give mine to the flying OCAD building — it’s just completely crazy.

  • http://www.torontoist.com David Topping

    I like the Crystal too, but it’s an awfully big stretch to call it unique, especially now. (See right up at the top of this article.)

  • http://undefined pman

    TokyoTuds, you’re in for a big disappointment when you get inside the wretched thing. We visited once and found the experience of being inside the Crystal really unpleasant. In particular, we found:
    1. The ground floor lobby/atrium space is gloomy.
    2. The ground floor “Spirit Room” (whatever that is) is just a strange, pretentious waste of space.
    3. Ground floor pedestrian movemment from ticket counter to check-in is really badly planned.
    4. The Stair of Wonders isn’t. And its off to the side location makes no sense.
    5. Elevators are inadequate.
    6. Those sloping walls and acute-angled floor plans mean useable floor space for exhibits is way too cramped.
    7. And further to 6, there’s no room in the Crystal galleries to step back from exhibits, or contemplate them from a bench.
    8. There are actually level changes from one gallery to another.
    9. There doesn’t seem to be any natural flow from one gallery to another.
    In short, the interior of the Crystal is a train wreck.

  • http://undefined jjones444

    Toronto is innovative in its architecture and buildings, so people in other cities want to mimmick it! I have heard that the nightlife there is awesome too. I think it’s definitely a city for a younger crowd, people who want to go out, and stay out late and play loud music.