Today Sun Mon
It is forcast to be Chance of Snow at 10:00 PM EST on February 11, 2012
Chance of Snow
-4°/-8°
It is forcast to be Chance of Snow at 10:00 PM EST on February 12, 2012
Chance of Snow
0°/-4°
It is forcast to be Clear at 10:00 PM EST on February 13, 2012
Clear
3°/-2°

13 Comments

news

NOW Readers Heart Torontoist Again

20091028NOW_1.jpg

20091028NOW_2.jpg
Photos by David Topping/Torontoist.


For the second year in a row, readers of the alt-weekly that we have never written anything critical about, not even once, have voted Torontoist Toronto’s Best Blog. Aw shucks, NOW readers, thanks. We accept.
This year, NOW‘s critics’ choice for best website—we were it last year!—are music junkies AUX.tv, who we’re quite fond of (and whose new TV channel we’ve profiled). So that’s cool, too. But see if you can spot the dig at an innocent bystander in NOW‘s description of its winner:

New sites in Toronto always seem to attempt what’s been done elsewhere. And whether they follow the media-watching Gawker model or the TMZ celebrity trail, they end up mondo failures. AUX.tv, though, does the opposite. Where other media are moving away from dedicated music programming, AUX goes toward it, filling a niche demand and nabbing a television show (Rogers channel 107) in the process.

You’d be forgiven for missing it, but that paragraph’s whole first half is almost certainly aimed squarely at the newly launched Mondoville, which could be described as “follow[ing] the media-watching Gawker model” and “the TMZ celebrity trail” and which is helmed by former Eye Weekly writer Marc Weisblott. (Get it? NOW thinks Mondoville is a “mondo” failure.) It is at this point in this article that we would like to remind you that last year NOW called us “petulant and snarky.” Thank goodness that the paper’s readers display such consistent good judgment and are also attractive and cool and probably very fun to hang out with.
You can see the rest of NOW and NOW‘s readers’ picks for the Best ________ in Toronto online or on newsstands now.

Filed under: , , , , ,

Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • http://undefined Ben

    Congrats on the selection.
    Whatever happened to that crazy-looking website that was supposed to look like you were standing inside a giant auditorium, supposedly supposed to click on boxes that gave Toronto based info? I bet it’s long gone now.

  • rek

    I’d never even heard of Mondoville.

  • Karen Whaley

    I love petty Toronto media drama. Without posts like this, I’d never hear about it!

  • http://undefined MariaPD

    I’m not sure about Now readers’ picks: best bbq chicken Swiss Chalet? Best bar and grill Milestones? Best burger Lick’s? Seriously? It’s like it was a “best known” and not actually “best best” contest.
    I don’t mean to diminish Torontoist’s recognition, just an observation of what readers were picking.

  • http://undefined Crystal

    I was excited about Aux’s website win.
    Then I read Mondo’s stab.
    Then I got excited about this article.
    Huzzah. AUX for the win.

  • http://undefined rek

    Isn’t that how it always goes? I think Taco Bell won once.

  • http://undefined MariaPD

    Best website Facebook? Gimme a break.

  • http://www.torontoist.com David Topping

    I have always told people that Torontoist is the Taco Bell of Toronto blogs.

  • http://www.guesswork.ca Patrick Metzger

    And you, David, are the chihuahua.

  • http://rantspectacle.blogspot.com/ mccool

    last year in EYE weekly’s “best of toronto” taco bell was named best burrito and (the kicker for me) the keg was named ‘best night out’. at least NOW has two categories: reader’s picks (usually chains) and critics picks.

  • http://undefined alieliz

    Torontoist is hilarious. Had you not won “best blog,” it’s virtually certain that David Topping would have been moaning about the idiocy of NOW’s poll. Let’s maintain some semblance of credibility by acknowledging ridiculousness when we see it. For those that didn’t get a chance to check it out/vote, the NOW poll offers the choice of the incumbent or a “disagree” option in which voters must type in their selection. And people thought Florida was unfair… I’m not sure what’s worse — NOW’s collusion-riddled poll, or Torontoist unabashed acceptance of an illegitimate award. Either way, I expected more from a blog that so explicitly advertises its lofty journalistic ambitions.

  • http://undefined Joshua E

    @alieliz NOW’s voting system allows you to disagree without filling in anything. Disagree votes cancel out agree votes. Yes, this might be skewed toward incumbents, but then so is every other voting system in the universe.

  • http://undefined alieliz

    Sorry, no dice on this one Joshua. NOW’s “Best of Toronto” advertises itself as a poll, not a referendum. In other words, while one is able to disagree with the choice of the incumbent, a proper poll gives a selection of options rather than merely a choice to agree/disagree. In this case, should one want to vote for Spacing or blogTO, he/she would absolutely have to write that in.
    And, yes, voting systems almost invariably favour the incumbent, but this particular survey does so to such an extent that the results are almost meaningless. Perhaps you might explain why NOW chooses to conduct voting in this manner? It just seems so willfully foolish to me…