Today Sat Sun
It is forcast to be Mostly Cloudy at 10:00 PM EST on February 03, 2012
Mostly Cloudy
6°/-3°
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 10:00 PM EST on February 04, 2012
Partly Cloudy
4°/-2°
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 10:00 PM EST on February 05, 2012
Partly Cloudy
3°/-2°

13 Comments

news

The Day TEDxTO Took Over

20090911tedx8.jpg
d’bi young


What is TEDxTO? TEDxTO is what happens when you pack the Theatre Passe Muraille from wall to wall with a hand-selected group of Toronto’s most eager social media types, ply them with free quinoa salad and chocolate truffles, and then give them a packed day full of presentations from noted local artists, performers, and professionals to watch, then discuss. Essentially, it’s one part performance appreciation, and one part networking bacchanal. We’ve seen plenty of rooms worked in our day, but none of them so thoroughly, or so well. Even noted Twittermeister Mayor Miller made an appearance, and spent one of the event’s two designated “conversation breaks” encircled by his followers.
As we mentioned in a previous post, all attendees (except media) were required to submit applications for tickets, with details about their life achievements. As a result, the atmosphere was rarefied, but the crowd was nevertheless gregarious and open. And those who didn’t make the cut had several webcast viewing parties around the region to attend (including one at the Toronto Reference Library, sponsored by Torontoist).
TED talks, by way of background, are an increasingly prestigious series of annual lectures put on by New York City based company, TED Conference LLC. TEDxTO, it must be noted, was not an “official” TED event. It was produced under the imprimatur of TED’s “TEDx” program, launched just this past March, which allows independent organizers to stage TED-style events, using the TED logo (and the accompanying TED prestige). A representative from TED’s New York offices told us that TEDx talks are occasionally promoted to full-fledged TED talk status if the home office deems them worthy. TED headquarters also carefully vets all TEDx events by means of a series of applications. But that’s as far as the association between TED and TEDx goes.
TEDxTO, which happened on Thursday and was based around the theme of “What’s Next?”, was the first-ever TED-affiliated event to be put on in Toronto. Its organizers are hoping to make it an annual occurence. If you completely missed it, worry not: Torontoist has a look at every TEDxTO talk, with photos, for your reading and viewing delectation. See them after the jump, in chronological order.

d’bi young (Playwright/Performer/Dub Poet): “What’s Next” [pictured above]

Young’s answer to TEDxTO’s thematic question was unequivocal: “What’s next is love,” she said. “Yes. Love love love love love.”
Her presentation was a poetic performance, full of stern crescendos and little lulls. It defies in-depth description, but it was haunting to listen to. It was a perfect call to attention for the start of the main event.

Don Tapscott (Author of Grown up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World): “The Future of Education”

20090911tedx14.jpg


“One of the things that’s next, may I modestly propose,” Tapscott began, “is that we need to rebuild the world.”
Tapscott’s research deals with the rapidly evolving learning styles of so-called “digital natives” (essentially anyone born after the advent of the personal computer). His thesis was that these younger learners—these native users of digital technology—are ill-served by existing forms of pedagogy. As evidence, he told the story of a twenty-two-year-old Rhodes Scholar he once met, who claimed never to read books unless absolutely necessary, because all he really needed to know in order to be his successful self was available online.
Tapscott proposed a radical overhaul of educational practice, to accommodate the learning styles of people like his distinguished, non-reading acquaintance, who might feel isolated and alienated by the traditional “drill and kill” lecture-and-test routine.
The evidence was anecdotal, but the conclusions felt correct.

Tom Rand (Co-Developer of Planet Traveler Hotel): “Planet Traveler: The Green Hotel”

20090911tedx6.jpg


Rand is one half of the entrepreneurial partnership behind Planet Traveler Hotel (the other half of the partnership is—full disclosure—this writer’s former landlord, who couldn’t be bothered to fix a leaky ceiling for six months). Planet Traveler, designed to consume only one-quarter the carbon of an ordinary establishment its size, bills itself as “North America’s greenest hotel.”
Said Rand of his naivete prior to embarking on his green project: “I didn’t know geothermal from a hole in the ground, to be honest.” That cracked up the room.
Rand said that Planet Traveler’s green features, which include geothermal heating and cooling, efficient lighting, and solar panels, actually make the building more cost-effective to operate than a standard hotel. In a gutsy conclusion, he called upon policy-makers to either subsidize or mandate green retrofits for all commercial buildings.

Michael McClelland (Principal, ERA Architects): “Renewing Concrete Communities”

20090911tedx4.jpg


McClelland’s talk was easily one of the highlights of this year’s TEDxTO. His thesis was that Toronto, contrary to popular belief, is actually a relatively dense city, with enough high-rise communities to forestall urban sprawl. In fact, by McClelland’s count, Toronto has “the second largest number of towers in North America.” The thing is, a lot of them aren’t downtown.
According to McClelland, a large percentage of Toronto’s citizenry lives in high density apartment buildings, most of which are located outside the city’s core. These areas aren’t on the subway lines, which makes them, for all intents and purposes, “invisible.” McClelland expressed hope that planned light-rail expansions would bring these hidden communities, many of which are poor, back into the light, and render them more vibrant. He also said that unless something to improve community life in these places did occur, that “Toronto could have riots in five years’ time,” which seemed a little, well, dire.
But in his conclusion, he mentioned that City Council is already on board with a plan to start making improvements on some of those old apartment buildings. Maybe there’s hope, yet.

Steven Woods (Site Director, Google Waterloo): “Google’s Vision for a Mobile Web”

20090911tedx9.jpg


Ever since Google noticed a spike in mobile internet usage (Woods pegs the world’s mobile user base at somewhere around 3.2 billion people), they’ve been working on ways of capitalizing. This presentation was full of graphs and figures, all illustrating the explosive growth of mobile computing.
To be fair, Woods’s angle of attack wasn’t all that Google-centric. Nevertheless, the whole talk had the feel of Google boilerplate, and, ironically, it was interrupted at points by Woods’s occasional struggles with his notes, which he was reading on his iPhone.

Richard St. John (Success Analyst): “Success Is Always Asking: ‘What’s Next?’”

20090911tedx12.jpg


St. John delivered a short motivational speech, derived from his years of interviewing “successful people” in an attempt to crack their secrets.
Here’s his closing platitude:
“Make sure you have a very small rearview mirror that doesn’t let you look behind, and a huge windshield.”
He was big on car metaphors.

David Makepeace (Eclipse Chaser, Filmmaker): “Understanding Ourselves in an Epic Universe”

20090911tedx15.jpg


“I was never a deep person, I never had deep thoughts about things,” said Makepeace (brother of Torontoist panorama whiz Tony Makepeace). “Until this, my first total eclipse of the sun.”
This was not so much a presentation as it was a soliloquy on the transformational power of solar eclipses, which Makepeace has travelled around the world to witness on all seven continents.
There was some legitimate showmanship on display here, and the video footage of solar eclipses that served as a backdrop for Makepeace’s performance was eerie and fantastic.

Dr. Charlotte Yates (Dean, Faculty of Social Sciences, McMaster University): “The Future of Unions”

20090911tedx10.jpg


Yates devoted her time on stage to challenging the notion that unions are “anachronistic organizations.” Yes, there was a nod to Toronto’s city workers’ strike. Even better, Mayor Miller was there to receive it.
Yates shared data which demonstrated a correlation between higher union membership and higher levels of social protection. For unions to survive long enough to continue providing these benefits to another generation of workers, she argued, they will need to quickly acclimate themselves to a newly globalized business environment, and an increasingly individualistic culture.
This was a much needed reminder that unions, when they’re not refusing to collect our garbage, actually do manage to perform a significant amount of social good, and are worth preserving for the future.

Mathew Ingram (Online Communities Editor, the Globe and Mail): “Five Ways New Media Will Save Old Media”

20090911tedx7.jpg


“I help journalists figure out how to use the internet,” was Ingram’s self-supplied job description. Strangely, from what we were able to gather from the rest of his talk, this seems fairly close to the truth.
Ingram looks at his work cultivating a true, interactive online presence for the the Globe and Mail as a stab at nothing less than the salvation of so-called “old media.” It’s a task he compares to “teaching the fish to walk on its fins.”
Though he conceded that bloggers have all the tools necessary to compete with traditional media, Ingram holds out hope for print culture stalwarts like his employer, because, he said, they still have one thing most of their upstart competitors don’t: a long, established reputation for integrity and rigour.
“Trust is effectively a competitive advantage,” he said. And later: “Trust is the only thing we have left.”

Waawaate Fobister (Playwright, Choreographer, Dancer, Producer): “Telling Very Personal Stories”

20090911tedx5.jpg


Fobister gave what amounted to a synopsis of his hit one-man show, Agokwe, which won several Dora Awards in 2009. The story concerns a formative incident in Fobister’s life as a teenager on an Anishnaabe reservation: he develops a crush on a boy from a neighbouring reservation, contrary to the anti-homosexual mores of his community, and fails to act on it in time.
It was a good story, and it was “very personal,” as promised, but this talk left us wanting more of a thesis to take away and mull over.

Gavin Sheppard (Executive Director, REMIX Project): “Creative Education”

20090911tedx3.jpg


Sheppard delivered a strong speech about his efforts to create a life skills program for GTA youth. The inspiration for the program, which eventually developed into The Remix Project, was Sheppard’s own frustration with traditional education. “To be blatantly honest,” he said, “I feel like I’ve been insulted by the education system.”
Sheppard’s program uses hip-hop culture to reach out to youth who might otherwise give up on education. “Culture is our trojan horse,” he said. This talk neatly incorporated some of the day’s overarching themes (improving education, revitalizing troubled communities), and it was a pleasure to sit through. It’s easy to see why Sheppard has been so successful in reaching out to mistrustful kids: he’s sincere, and he’s really funny.

Min Sook Lee (Documentary Filmmaker): “Raising my Toxic Baby”

20090911tedx2.jpg


Lee spoke about the challenges of parenthood in a commercialized age. “There’s this whole baby industrial complex out there,” she said. “I think it’s part of our consumer culture. It’s this whole idea that you buy your way into the parenting hall of fame.”
Lee’s recent documentary, My Toxic Baby, which will be premiering at TIFF this year, tackles one particular consequence of this “baby industrial complex”: the presence of artificial toxins in seemingly ordinary items, like soap, food, and toys. Even cloth diapers, evidently, can contain pesticides, because the cotton from which they’re made is often heavily sprayed while it’s still on the plant. What’s a parent to do? Lee educated the audience about a fringe toilet training practice called “elimination communication,” which is, um, exactly what it sounds like.

Peter MacLeod (Principal, MASS LBP): “Imagining 2017 and Why it Begins Now”

20090911tedx1.jpg


Half elegy, half pep talk, MacLeod’s presentation lamented the absence of the spirit of ’67 in Canadian public life, while challenging the crowd to help revive that spirit in time for Canada’s sesquicentennial (that’s a 150-year anniversary) in 2017.
“In the run-up to 2017, we need to give ourselves permission to get imaginative as a country again,” he said, and got some mid-presentation applause, which was rare on the day. MacLeod has already organized a conference of prominent Canadian thinkers and organizers, for them to start considering ways of celebrating the sesquicentennial. It will occur in spring 2010.
By MacLeod’s reckoning, 2017 will be as much about multinationalism as 1967 was about multiculturalism. Judging by the crowd’s enthusiastic reaction, he might just be right.
Photos by J. Adam Huggins and Aaron Rodericks, courtesy of TEDxTO.

Comments

  • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

    If TEDxTO is to earn promotion to full TED status (and I hope it eventually does), the organizers will have to do better than giving away speaking spots to “success analysts”, entrepreneurs riding the coattails of the environmental trend, and bearers of corporate messaging.
    These are caricatures of the best speakers at TED proper, who might respectively be people who had experienced actual failure (and modest success), those running charitable or NGO startups, or brilliant technologists who merely happen to work for large technology companies.
    There are also a number of academics who present research in compelling ways. I’m surprised no-one with these qualities was located at U of T, despite it being so large and so close.
    The barometer of success has to be the spontaneous applause (from, as mentioned, an audience of notables) that interrupts presenters. There’s no formula to produce this, but if the audience is merely nodding in agreement, you’re not working hard enough to surprise them with new ideas.

  • http://undefined Ryan Merkley

    Paul, you’re entitled to your opinion, but I can’t agree with your criticism of the speakers’ bona fides. [full disclosure: I managed the selection process]
    It’s not about resumes, it’s about ideas. TEDxTO’s speakers were brave, learned, engaging, and are doing important work to better our city, our nation, and the world. I’m proud of the 13 speakers with big ideas who stood before our live audience and a 1,500 person webcast to share their life’s work.
    TEDx isn’t performance art: it’s interactive. It’s their ideas interacting with your brain. Attendees interacting with each other. I saw it all day during the event, and I know it happened at the 13 watching parties throughout the day. It will happen again when the talks are posted on the TEDx YouTube channel later this fall.
    For me, the highlight was a backstage conversation I enjoyed with Gavin Sheppard and Michael McClelland (Gavin was moved by Michael’s talk, and rushed back to the green room to meet him). They are working in exactly the same neighbourhoods, with similar goals, and from entirely opposite schools of thinking, but they are both passionate optimists who are actually doing something to make a difference. They, like many of the speakers yesterday, are changing the face of this city.
    The true measure of success won’t be with an applause meter, as you suggest, but with the spread of those very ideas TEDx (and TED) seeks to share.

  • http://undefined Ryan Merkley

    Paul, you’re entitled to your opinion, but I can’t agree with your criticism of the speakers’ bona fides. [full disclosure: I managed the selection process]
    It’s not about resumes, it’s about ideas. TEDxTO’s speakers were brave, learned, engaging, and are doing important work to better our city, our nation, and the world. I’m proud of the 13 speakers with big ideas who stood before our live audience and a 1,500 person webcast to share their life’s work.
    TEDx isn’t performance art: it’s interactive. It’s their ideas interacting with your brain. Attendees interacting with each other. I saw it all day during the event, and I know it happened at the 13 watching parties throughout the day. It will happen again when the talks are posted on the TEDx YouTube channel later this fall.
    For me, the highlight was a backstage conversation I enjoyed with Gavin Sheppard and Michael McClelland (Gavin was moved by Michael’s talk, and rushed back to the green room to meet him). They are working in exactly the same neighbourhoods, with similar goals, and from entirely opposite schools of thinking, but they are both passionate optimists who are actually doing something to make a difference. They, like many of the speakers yesterday, are changing the face of this city.
    The true measure of success won’t be with an applause meter, as you suggest, but with the spread of those very ideas TEDx (and TED) seeks to share.

  • http://undefined sgw

    Interesting comments, Paul. Were you there? I found the speakers varied in the extreme, interesting, and times elating, and to a person – accomplished in their areas. The ideas presented were thought provoking, interesting and in many cases challenging and in some cases even potentially disturbing. While my own talk may have been delivered without as much professional “edge” or verve as some of the wonderfully talented individuals invited to speak, I assure you I believe the ideas I expressed to be fundamental to the nature of innovation online over the next decade, and not at all in the mindset of the current thinking on the matter, and perhaps not even broadly agreed upon by a majority of those at my place of work. I work in an environment where challenging ideas are embraced and the general conception is to make the world a better place through facilitating both an open exchange of ideas and a world in which information is not only available to everyone, but also in which everyone’s ideas can be offered to the world for consideration. My thoughts came from my heart and my long experience in my industry – achieved through both exciting successes and heartbreaking failures. It is true I have a job with a large company of a sort – Google – but our company is not about supporting a self-serving model of the world as a primary exercise, and those that suggest it are missing the point that is Google. Thanks for the TEDxTO experience TEDxTO folk!

  • http://undefined spacejack

    I’m just curious, just how do you differentiate the “entrepreneurs riding the coattails of the environmental trend” from the True Believers?

  • http://undefined pjc

    How many of these U of T based academics applied to speak? I am sure if they did they would have been considered.
    Also when you say that the speakers need to be improved are you talking about the same “success analyst” who has spoken at the TED proper? I mean the “success analyst” who has spoken at TED twice.
    http://bit.ly/rulsT
    http://bit.ly/pNlbv

  • http://undefined pjc

    As one of the organizers of the event I also completely agree with Ryan, that the true measure of success should be the impact the ideas shared at TEDxTO has on the city.
    How did the attendees, speakers, viewers and future viewers of videos posted take the calls to action, the questions, the inspiration and points made and turn them into change in our city and world? This is the true measure of a conference that is about ideas worth spreading.
    The conference is not about ideas worth “spontaneously applauding” because maybe only 3 or 4 in attendance truly understand the thesis or implications of the speakers work, but it will be these people who run with the ideas and make change that matters. Applause ends – ideas never stop.

  • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

    sgw (Steven Woods?): no, and neither was I free to watch any of the live coverage, much to my dismay.
    spacejack: The website for the main conference gives some details on speaker selection including, “Rules for TED speakers include a ban on ‘selling from the stage’ (no plugging your company or organization)…”. I’m not sure if TEDxTO uses this rule or not. That doesn’t preclude entrepreneurs from speaking or even drawing universal lessons from their companies’ history, but the article doesn’t make it seem like that was what Tom Rands was doing.
    pjc (Paul Crowe?), Ryan: the above-linked page invites visitors to nominate speakers. Earlier coverage on Torontoist divides TEDxTO speakers into (a) invitees “that we’d like to see” and (b) applicants. Most of the academics I know (even the brilliant and thought-provoking ones) have little time or taste for self-promotion. Among those I linked in my first post, V.S. Ramachandran seems like a good example. While he’s clearly happy to be there, it’s easier to imagine him working long clinical hours than looking for conferences like TED at which to apply to speak. TED seems to deliberately cast a net for this type of person by asking for nominations, and the results are good.
    And of course in following Torontoist’s coverage, including the announcement of the speakers’ list back in August, I looked up the names and realized I’d already seen (and been underwhelmed by) Richard St. John’s TED talks. I hope you didn’t think you’d caught me with my foot in my mouth, not knowing who I was criticizing.
    There’s no perfect filter. TED itself is hit and miss, success analysts included, but the proportion of hits among their featured talks is very, very high. Please don’t read into my post a general criticism of the TEDxTO slate; I trust Torontoist’s assessment of Michael McClelland, Gavin Sheppard, Peter MacLeod, and some others—and am eager to see the videos. I mean only that TEDxTO should aspire to reach or better the same ratio.
    I also care about the ideas, else I’d have shut up by now, so I hope you’ll reconsider my remark about ovations. For an audience to be so startled or surprised by a new idea that they leap to their feet is a sign that you have created a “Eureka!” moment. Whatever pedestrian use they (and millions of online viewers) later make of that idea, you could find no more immediate sign of your success.

  • http://undefined spacejack

    Well, having worked with him in the past, I do know a few things about Tom:
    1. He’s been deeply interested and concerned with climate change (and environmental issues in general) ever since I met him, which is probably since you were still learning to stay inside the lines of your AGW colouring book.
    2. Despite the self-deprecating comments that might indicated otherwise, he does have a science degree and knows a thing or two about climate science and green tech – a lot more than you, I’d wager.
    3. He can (and has) earned a better living doing other things than inventing super-energy-efficient hotels. If that’s what he’s doing, then you can bet it was where a whole lot of serious research (and probably a not-insignificant personal investment) has led him to believe he can personally make the most impact.
    Anyway, he’s doing something he believes in, you’re writing holier than thou comments on blogs. Keep on fighting the good fight! Maybe someday you’ll graduate to writing me-too comments on realclimate.

  • http://undefined juepucta

    Doesn’t Znaimer’s IdeaCity thing do this every single year. Yeah, some of the speakers are wack-ass motivational speakers that should be confined to late night infommercials (something which TED weeds out better), but for the most part the thing is good.
    -G.

  • http://paul.kishimoto.name Paul Kishimoto

    writing holier than thou comments

    Suddenly I regret making this my primary occupation.
    Also apparently some people were born at different times from other people? I never knew.

  • http://undefined Ryan Merkley

    Paul,
    The TEDxTO vids will be up on YouTube soon, and I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised by what you see. I’ll take your criticisms with a grain of salt until you’ve had a chance to actually see the talks.
    As for selection, it was a hybrid model: speakers were nominated, or they could apply themselves, and our organizing committee generated speakers — both individuals and specific topics we hoped to see at the event. We sought a good mix of ideas, levels of experience and achievement, sectors, etc. In the end, about half of our speakers were from the community, and about half of those by nomination.
    If you had seen the webcast, you would not only have heard spontaneous applause, but also a lot of laughter, and some long riveting silences. It is a measure of success, but not the main measure for us.
    To juepucta, the main difference between TEDx and IdeaCity is that TEDx is free for everyone. No one was charged to attend the event or watch the webcast. By contrast, a ticket to IdeaCity will cost you $3,000.
    Either way, I think there’s lots of ideas to go around.

  • http://undefined Ryan Merkley

    Paul,
    The TEDxTO vids will be up on YouTube soon, and I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised by what you see. I’ll take your criticisms with a grain of salt until you’ve had a chance to actually see the talks.
    As for selection, it was a hybrid model: speakers were nominated, or they could apply themselves, and our organizing committee generated speakers — both individuals and specific topics we hoped to see at the event. We sought a good mix of ideas, levels of experience and achievement, sectors, etc. In the end, about half of our speakers were from the community, and about half of those by nomination.
    If you had seen the webcast, you would not only have heard spontaneous applause, but also a lot of laughter, and some long riveting silences. It is a measure of success, but not the main measure for us.
    To juepucta, the main difference between TEDx and IdeaCity is that TEDx is free for everyone. No one was charged to attend the event or watch the webcast. By contrast, a ticket to IdeaCity will cost you $3,000.
    Either way, I think there’s lots of ideas to go around.