Okay, first John Cartwright kicks David Miller out of his parade, and now George Smitherman wants his job. We can only assume that Stephen Harper is about to burn down Miller's house and shoot his dog. Anyway, Smitherman, Ontario's deputy premier, looks ready to step out of Dalton McGuinty's shadow and into City Hall next year, depriving Queen's Park of a major cabinet minister in the process. "I think there is a bit of a consensus forming in the city that the status quo is not getting the job done," Smitherman told the Star. Hmm, wonder where he got that line?
Not to sugarcoat it, but Miller's approval rating is tanking and Smitherman is only one of the contenders who smell mayoral blood. Karen Stintz, not quite famous for supporting a not-quite-likely Eglinton subway line, is signalling she's ready for a fight, too. [Publisher's note: One key member of Karen Stintz's mayoral campaign exploratory committee is Rob Silver, who is also a co-owner of Ink Truck Media, Torontoist's publishers.]
Well, Toronto's elections are a year away, but if Smitherman were to seek and win the city's highest public office at 100 Queen West, would he be Toronto's first gay mayor? Does it matter? Well, at the very least, it would be a fun fact to include in the materials for World Pride 2014 if Toronto wins its bid for the event, (which sounds a million times better than 2015 Pan Am Games—though both would be good).
And troubled driver Michael Bryant is still a top story in Toronto dailies—does that count as reputation rehabilitation? The PR firm Navigator Limited, which Bryant hired after his traffic accident in which cyclist Darcy Allan Sheppard was killed, has launched a social media campaign to help the former (and future?) politician restore the shine to his public image. So basically, it's like a mini Obama campaign, only backwards! Never heard of Navigator? Well, fancy that—you should definitely take a skim through the Star's eyebrow-raising piece on the low-profile firm).
As well as shoring up Bryant's facebook page, Navigator has opened a blog and a twitter account, both named Bryantfacts. The blog, (which seems to have disabled comments at this time) puts out brief statements defending Bryant, while @bryantfacts mostly tweets rebuttals to any twit who tweets about this video on their twitter feed. Oh, and for trivia fans out there, the visual theme Navigator has chosen to use at this time for the Bryantfacts blog is, oddly enough, called "Contempt." Dang, they didn't have to go right out and say it.
Okay, time is short and so are attention spans this early in the morning, so let's do the lightning thing for the rest: City Hall won't decide whether to make garbage collection and ambulance driving essential services until the mayor's office does some homework on the issue. A report on why Toronto man Jim Hearst died while waiting for an ambulance that took over half an hour to arrive is...late, because "key police and ambulance contacts" were on vacation and couldn't be interviewed. Check back on Tuesday. And while the Conservative government is talking strategy for this election, a judge is getting ready to rule on whether or not Harper's parliament-melting electoral manoeuvre last year was illegal—but hey, look, it's even got China reporting on Canadian realpolitik! There's some leadership for ya.
This article's second paragraph originally said that "before rattling a laundry list of complaints about Miller's civic stewardship, [Karen Stintz] paused to pose the question of how Miller could get even the little bit of approval he has. Says Stintz about Miller's poll numbers, in a quotation now missing from the Post's article: 'I don’t know where he gets the traction. Maybe cyclists [in] downtown Toronto?' Torontoist would love to make heads or tails of that remark, but sadly, that job falls to you." In fact, those words were actually said by Rob Ford, not Stintz; the Post, and subsequently Torontoist, attributed them incorrectly.

Newsstand: November 23, 2009
Never mind what Stintz said; I think it's going to take me the rest of the day to correctly interpret the Post's graphs, in which 4 + 25 is somehow less than 9 + 20, but the same as 2 + 25, and in which any two numbers add up to 100%.
I have just gone through the full polling data, which various news outlets have been covering in various ways. The rundown:
"Generally speaking would you say you approve or disapprove of the overall performance of the Mayor?" 29% approve or strongly approve
"The next Toronto Municipal election in the fall of 2010. Even though it is just over a year before it takes place, which do you believe should happen?" 21% say Mayor David Miller deserves to be re-elected and continue to lead the City. 79% say It's time someone else was chosen as Mayor to lead the City.
So, basically, 8% of respondents approve of Miller but also say it's time for someone new. All the discrepancies in the various numbers have to do with details like this, which allow for some...leeway(?) in how the poll is getting spun.That video is hopefully going to put Bryant away for a very long time. It's pretty clear how reckless he was.
I agree, narrated or not, the footage is incriminating and the "minor collision" (read: vehicular assault) does not appear accidental. Perhaps this video footage is what caused Bryant to have his driving privileges revoked.
How can we let road rage resulting in death and endangerment of the public (driving on the wrong side of the road while speeding and riding the curb) be written off as negligence? I sincerely hope that that additional charges will be laid, because the precedent that this case would set, should Bryant walk, would make our public roads a very frightening place to be.
I hope everyone notes that counter to news reports, Darcy did not throw his bicycle at Bryant's car. Also, rather than approach Bryant from the driver's side, Darcy moved to the side, and had to catch up to Bryant's vehicle as it started to flee the scene of the "minor collision."
What I hope is that the eventual trial will be well covered and well documented, so that when both sides get to tell their sides of the story fairly and equally, without prejudice and spin campaigns, the public and those involved with have a clear picture from which to make up their mind.
I also hope, vainly, that people will stop thinking this incident has anything to do with bike lanes, pro or con.
I agree, while I'm for complete road infrastructure, this case is about a man who broke the law resulting in another's death. Bike lanes wouldn't have prevented this, because the aggressor, Bryant, appears to have made a, by all accounts, sober decision to ram Sheppard with his vehicle.
If this were an accident, there would be a case for new infrastructure, but as a crime it is outside the mediation of the built environment.
I don't know Bryant at all, but don't you find it a bit odd in the least to assume that he, at the end of what seems to be a rather pleasant celebratory evening with his wife, curled his mustache in his fingers and decided to ram a stranger with his car?
Especially with that stranger's history, recent and not-so-recent?
I don't deny that there may have been words between the two, but we still don't know who started the name-calling. In any case, cheque fraud and cycling aren't exactly related. You can make the same parallel between Bryant's race car crushing and pit-bull bans as evidence of an aggressive nature, as you can of Sheppard's cheque fraud and… wait, what did he do again? It's best to stick to what happened rather than their characters.
Whatever transpired, Bryant escalated it beyond reasonable force. In other circumstances (read: not involving ex A-Gs), the charge of manslaughter would have been laid, because it was a crime brought on by emotion, not pre-meditation.
I don't deny that there may have been words between the two, but we still don't know who started the name-calling. In any case, cheque fraud and cycling aren't exactly related. You can make the same parallel between Bryant's race car crushing and pit-bull bans as evidence of an aggressive nature, as you can of Sheppard's cheque fraud and… wait, what did he do again? It's best to stick to what happened rather than their characters.
Whatever transpired, Bryant escalated it beyond reasonable force. In other circumstances (read: not involving ex A-Gs), the charge of manslaughter would have been laid, because it was a crime brought on by emotion, not pre-meditation.
The above post should have been inline as a response to friend68, feel free to delete it.
Significant correction: That Stintz quote about downtown cyclists is actually from Rob Ford. Stintz is an idiot for so, so many reasons but, unlike Rob Ford, she can actually string together a sentence in proper English.
I'm going to get in touch with the Post's team right now and find out why the quotation was removed from the article, and find out who it's properly attributed to if not Stintz.
According to Rob Roberts, Toronto Editor of the Post: "it was in fact a quote from Stintz."
But, if you have another source which indicates otherwise, please do let us know and we'll follow up again.
And you were right. Correction appended above.
Alas, I don't have a screen cap of the article so there's no proof but I'm not buying Rob Roberts's response. Last night the quote was attributed to Ford and the way that quote is phrased should make a believer of anyone.
Stintz just doesn't give quotes like that; she's a (half wit) policy wonk. For example, Stintz has always couched her disdain for cyclists behind euphemisms like saying we need a "balanced approach to transportation." Even when she inflamed debate about Jarvis St. bike lanes by using war analogies, she didn't reject the need to protect cyclists, nor did she resort to ad hominem attacks on cyclists as a political constituency.
Moreover, while Stintz has been known to set up a downtown/suburbs zero sum game dichotomy from time to time, "downtown Toronto" isn't something she's known to say with the sort of disdain that quote implies (largely because her Yonge/Eglinton ward doesn't feel in any way alienated from the city). But that's exactly how Ford talks about Toronto's core -- as far as he's concerned, Etobicoke could be in Alberta or on Mars because it has no cultural relationship to the former city of Toronto.
In any event, I realize that without a screenshot or the Post's confirmation there will be no correction but I stand by my claim that it was Ford's quote, not Stintz's.
Green Sulfur, you're right: the quotation attributed to Karen Stintz by the Post (and subsequently, us), was from Rob Ford, not Stintz. Rob Roberts, the Post's Toronto Editor, just followed-up one more time with us.
I've appended a correction to the article saying as much just now.
Appreciate the diligence -- I was starting to second guess my ability to retain information for more than 12 hours.
Smitherman, Miller, Tory.
They're all the same.
Yesterday's men. Washed out characters from Toronto's distant past.
Is there no one young and engaging to run this crazy city?
Well we have had a clown Mayor that managed to build a subway, weve had a commie Mayor that has managed to bill Torontonians outrageous sums to build nothing and piss off two other levels of governement...at least Smitherman has experience dealing with all the loons at city hall and understands how freakin crazy they are from Miller and Giambrone right down to TTC management...if Toronto ever wants to catch up to other livable cities City Hall either needs to bankrupt itself or get one Huuuuuuge enema, and Smithereen is the man for the colonoscopy!
http://vintageleatherjackets.blogspot.com/