The city workers' strike has been a hardship, for sure. Toronto's parks are starting to look like garbage barges run aground, non-union city employees and private citizens alike are dirtying their hands and straining their muscles to keep our streets somewhat presentable, and the striking workers themselves have had to go all this time without drawing their usual paycheques. But brilliant coping strategies have a way of flourishing in times like these, like fruit flies on discarded banana peels. There is probably no better example of this than our new friend Todd. (Not his real name; a nom de grime.)
Todd is a practitioner of a burgeoning trade in strike-bound Toronto. He's an unlicensed garbage collector. It's not a role he fell into purely by accident.
When Todd heard about the city workers' strike, his initial reaction was anger. "I love this town," he said, during a phone call. "I grew up here."
Many have felt the same way, and most have left it at that. But Todd had other considerations. "I work for myself," he said, "and I really felt the pinch." He couldn't understand why city workers would walk off their dependable jobs, especially in a time of economic unpredictability.
Todd said he began his temporary sideline in garbage as a way of supplementing the income from his fledgling independent construction business, which he started just a few months ago. He said he has four children. The implication was that every dollar made hauling garbage was extremely helpful, though he never said that outright.
The major problem with the semi-pro trash-hauling business, the way Todd practices it, is that it's illegal. If you, as a private citizen in Toronto, haul garbage for other people on a regular basis, Ontario's Ministry of the Environment considers you and your vehicle to be a "Waste Management System." To haul within the law, you would first need to file an Application for Approval of a Waste Management System. The filing fee starts at five hundred dollars. That's a large sum, especially considering the economics of clandestine garbage collection during the strike. (An article published yesterday in the Star has much more detail.)
For Todd, the job works like so: His clientele is focused in an extremely narrow residential area. With his brother's help, he posted flyers in strategic places in his target neighborhoods. Then, for good measure, he did a little self-promotion: "Basically I just approached people and said 'are you interested in garbage removal.'"
Todd charges five dollars for every black garbage bag he picks up. Other, similar services we've seen advertised have been charging similar rates, in an odd (and extremely rank) demonstration of the free market's ability to stabilize itself. Some of these other services are infinitely more sketchy and post-apocalyptic than Todd's one-man operation. Another is brazenly well organized, complete with online ordering. Yet another was for charity.
In three hours, during the morning prior to our phone conversation, Todd said he'd made $150—the proceeds from approximately thirty bags of trash. He's not looking to expand his business any further. He said he stopped taking on new clients as soon as he read, in the newspaper, that a licence was necessary (though the only direct warnings he's received have come in the form of polite phone calls from striking workers, asking him to stop what he's doing).
For a part-timer like Todd, paying five hundred dollars for a permit would mean giving up the equivalent of most of a week's profits, plus the opportunity cost of time spent waiting for his application to be processed. With the entire scheme dependent upon a strike that could (theoretically) end at any time, getting a permit purely for the sake of being on the up-and-up is an impracticality, if not an impossibility.
Plus, an interruption of service would be a let-down for his clients, as we found out this week when we joined him for a pickup.
The view from within the van.
Todd's vehicle was not the open flatbed truck we were expecting. He drives an enclosed panel van. It was still heaped with those thirty bags of garbage he'd told us about on the phone. They formed a mound that reached halfway up the sides. The interior of the van had that unique household waste smell that is somehow both rotten and sweet. Todd handed us a miniscule spray bottle of Febreeze and told us to give the trash mountain four or five good squirts.
It was a large amount of waste in a relatively small space, but Todd seemed used to it. In the beginning, he would offload it all at the city's designated dump sites (a few bags at a time, so as not to invite suspicion), but wait times quickly became intolerable. Now he drives to a dumpsite outside city limits and pays a nominal fee to get rid of his haul.
The day's first client lived in a basement apartment. Todd knocked on the door. Minutes later, a woman with curly hair emerged in a housecoat and handed Todd a single bag of trash, which he threw in the back of the van. He told her he wasn't charging her today, but she tried to insist. "No! I want to pay you," she said, beaming, as we climbed back into the van and left.
Todd said that the people whose trash he takes tend to be single mothers and people without cars, but that they're still a diverse group, within those parameters. "Everybody has garbage," he quipped. He said his clients are always very grateful to see their black bags go (even if CUPE and the province aren't).
"I feel like a drug dealer," he said.
Todd might technically be an outlaw, but he's also sort of a hero.
Photos by Steve Kupferman/Torontoist.

Elsewhere in the Ist-a-Verse
The other "major problem with the semi-pro trash-hauling business" is that it makes him a scab. I mean, I think this union is totally out of line and need to be dong a way better job getting information out, but you guys aren't helping, in fact you're totally bombing here. This is the third article on this blog about scabbing the union with no acknowledgment of that being what's going on. And your daily strike reports are talking about it like a natural disaster that hit the city with no info about the issues or the tactics. The vibe I always go from this blog was that you were good mild socialists.
Better watch out, soon the word scab will be equated with hero. Bad times for ideologues.
Most of trash collectors I've read about in publications like Torontoist have quit once they discovered the licensing requirement. Todd seems to do it because it's necessary for him to survive, and he feels he's helping some people. He's not working in a transfer station or manning a city-owned vehicle - that's the textbook definition of "scab," he might be fulfilling a union function but in an entirely different way from city garbage workers. If he could obtain a license, it sounds like he could safely run a home-business in a non-unionized fashion - it would just be obsolete at some point, because garbage workers will eventually return. He can't apply for a license even if he has the money, now - the city workers who would do that for him are on strike. I'd call him a citizen operating outside the law, for now. But not a scab. I think a "hero" would volunteer their services, like the people cleaning Queen West right now.
Well "scab" is only a derogatory name used by someone with an agenda to try to stigmatize someone else. Another might use "entrepreneur" or "local hero."
The message should be taken here that, for at least this small segment of striking workers, that if you think you are being paid unfairly for your labours, there are people ready to fill the gap.
Suggesting that what the union needs to do is to do a better job "getting information out" is to have the mistaken impression that if only people really understood the situation, they would agree with the CUPE position. I think it is fair to suggest that is not the case.
Another message perhaps, in your dismay at the suggested editorial direction of this site: even those who tend to support CUPE or the union cause in general will not necessarily do so indiscriminately.
Only union folk think "scabs" are bad, and there's virtually no support for the union on the garbage strike.
If you want to insist on throwing around blanket insults based on moral absolutes like "Scab", maybe we need to start using a similar word to describe the union members whose strike vote has meant that thousands of temporary summer workers (both within the union and without it) have lost their their jobs in the name of ridiculously untimely 3% pay rise and an antiquated (and discriminatory) sick pay system that they will never see the benefit of. "Selfish bastards" doesn't quite have the snappy ring. "Selfards"?
I'm sorry, but 'scab' isn't a bad word when you're realistic about stuff.
The unemployement rate is rising. Not even slowly.
People are literally losing their house(s).
If somebody wants to come get my garbage for five bucks a bag, I'm okay with it. Government regulation of this is just a joke. It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to pick up my bag, put it in a van, and drive away.
There are many (Single moms, the elderly, the disabled, etc.) who don't have access to a vehicle and can't afford to waste time standing in line to throw away their trash when they could be working to make ends meet, taking care of their children, etc.
Cue a claim this is proof that we can and should privatize all garbage collection in 3...2...
We don't have to privatize garbage collection. You just have to tender it. Let CUPE make a bid. If their bid meets the qualifications of the tender and is the low-cost bid, voila, contract goes to CUPE.
Which seems to make a lot sense. In the written tender, the City could use conditions to guarantee fair worker compensation and benefits, and still be acting responsibly to the citizens/ratepayers by making every effort to provide services in the most economical fashion.
Indeed. The only part that doesn't make sense is that CUPE is a labour union, not a garbage company.
As well, the City of Toronto has a 'Fair Wage Policy' which has been kicking around since 1893. It sets out minimum wage levels, benefits, pension entitlements, etc. that businesses contracting with the city have to provide their employees. Unless they change the policy, this would surely apply to contracted out garbage service.
As for being a scab, that's just calling a spade a spade. I, for one, just wish Todd was making a bit more interesting. Why not an entrepreneurial day camp? $5/head. Just toss the kids in the back of the van and drive around all day.
Erm. I've seen this suggested before, and it seems to be based on a major misunderstanding of what CUPE is as an entity, and of the difference between a service contract and a collective agreement.
CUPE is not a service provider. The striking workers are not employed by CUPE. CUPE most certainly does not own the equipment (trucks and so forth) used to collect the garbage. It makes no legal or practical sense to say CUPE should "bid" on a garbage collection contract.
The workers are employees of the City (and remain so despite the strike). They are currently trying to renegotiate the terms of their employment, and CUPE bargains on their behalf in this. This process bears not the slightest legal resemblance to tendering a service for contract to private companies.
OK, I've resisted this joke long enough.
"CUPE is not a service provider."
No worry, no one is in any danger of confusing CUPE with anything providing services.
I doubt that privatizing garbage collection would be cheaper or better, but I don't really know. My brother lived in Phoenix and in his 'burb there was no garbage collection by the municipality. Instead there 3 or 4 different companies that all offered garbage and recycling pickup, but that meant there were garbage trucks on his street everyday. So the municipality were 'forced' to limit the private collection to one single company... not exactly 'free market.' I think this example should be a caution to people advocating private collection: it would likely have to be one company that would then have a monopoly and the City would then have to step in and regulate it...and then it would pretty much just make sense to have the City pick it up since it's got to regulate it anyway...
Besides, do we really want to 'race to the bottom' in terms of paying people the least amount of money to do this? Isn't 'waste' the core of the whole enviro/green movement? Shouldn't this be much more professional and regulated so that people can just pay someone to make their so-called 'garbage' just 'disappear'? I tend to think that we shouldn't have the 'entitlement' to just have our 'garbage' picked up at the curb without a direct fee. I wonder if would be better if we always had to pay $10 per bag of garbage and $5 per bag of recycling. Maybe even make it more difficult than just 'leaving it at the curb' too: perhaps we should have to carry it to a corner.
Sure there are problems with my ideas here, but I think it should be a real pain in the ass to get rid of garbage.
For the Phoenix situation, how idiotic! Why limit to just one garbage collector rather than legislating one or two days for pickup that all collectors have to follow?
I'm pretty sure you could find that out on the Internet. It's the Scottsdale area, or maybe it's Paradise Valley. I seem to remember it was because many of the suburban roads are cul-de-sacs and/or have tight turns so more than one garbage truck at the same time can't fit. The trucks also do damage to the roads. BTW: there's also a bylaw that you're not allowed to back up in a truck before a certain time in the morning (like 9am or something) so there isn't the BEEP BEEP BEEP!
There's no real reason that the City has to be the trash collector, the alternative doesn't mean it has to be unregulated.
For instance, we don't say the government has to do your dental work, plumbing or accounting. This hasn't made those trades a free-for-all, it's still regulated and good paying jobs.
A resourced out garbage program can have any rules we want built into the contract.
I can't decide if I'm surprised or not that this thread has most of its focus on how to get 'garbage' collection back to normal, whether it be the City or private trash collector.
It seems that being confronted with our (again, OUR) 'garbage' (the material manifestation of our waste -not consumer- lifestyle) in parks and streets has not lead to much critical self-reflection. Instead, the ideology lives on: 'just get it gone, make it disappear.' This, I suppose, is not that surprising. I mean, who really wants to seriously confront the traumatic kernel of how we live?
I hope that this strike continues for a while, perhaps to the point where 'everyone' will know that those who are buying waste are the real culprits for the state of our parks, streets and sidewalks. It's the person, for example, who buys a disposable coffee cup who's contributing to this mess - not CUPE, not the City, not the mayor or whoever else is being blamed. The waste is mine and yours.
Of course, that's it! CUPE went on strike to protest how much trash the population generates!
Not much use complaining that the strike didn't cause everyone to have the exact same epiphany about trash as you.
I don't think I suggested anywhere that CUPE went on strike to "protest how much trash the population generates." I also don't think I was "complaining that the strike didn't cause everyone to have the exact same epiphany about trash as" I did. Rather, I was trying to share my thoughts about this and I try to do this in a 'suggestive' way with questions and using words like 'perhaps,' 'seems,' 'suppose,' etc. I don't have some special access to the Truth (though many others seem to think they do!). Normally I don't share my thoughts that much on here or other 'comment sections' unless I think there are people who might read it and it might give them something to think about. My thoughts may or may not do this - how can I really know? Your reply, though, doesn't really surprise me. In fact, it kinda confirms what I suggested: we don't want to deal with our waste. It's much easier (and all-too-common) to crack jokes, put someone down and get back to 'normal.' But that's cool - carry on..
I think what Todd is doing, although perhaps illegal without a license, is great. The lineups to be able to drop a bag off at one of these dump sites as absolutely ridiculous. Although he may not necessarily be volunteering his time and may be making a slight profit off of this, $5 a bag does not seem entirely outrageous and as the article demonstrates, he occasionally doesn't make individuals pay.
I don't know all the details about CUPE and what they are striking for (I do know it has to do with a 3% pay increase and other things) nor do I know all the details about private garbage collection. But looking at Etobicoke right now, and the fact that they have garbage collection without problems, private garbage collection seems pretty great right about now.
It seems that in terms of this strike, everyone is focusing on the lack of garbage collection. Although it makes the city dirty and smelly, I think the bigger issue here are things like daycares and day camps not running. Not having your garbage collected doesn't prevent you from going to work or worrying about what to do with your children doing the day. Although some people are lucky in that they can afford private day cares and private day camps and they have relatives or babysitters that can look after their children, the reality is many people are being forced to miss work affecting their income. Student jobs are affected and many students may not be able to pay their tuition come September because they were relying on these jobs. Even those who do work for the city full time, because they are out of jobs are loosing their income, which could result in the loss of their house, the inability to feed themselves, etc. What we have to remember here is that it is CUPE who declared the strike, not all their workers are in support of this.
--Luciano Galasso