Today Sun Mon
It is forcast to be Chance of Snow at 10:00 PM EST on February 11, 2012
Chance of Snow
-4°/-8°
It is forcast to be Chance of Snow at 10:00 PM EST on February 12, 2012
Chance of Snow
0°/-4°
It is forcast to be Clear at 10:00 PM EST on February 13, 2012
Clear
3°/-2°

21 Comments

news

Vaughan Slows the Entertainment District Beat

20090616newfrontst.jpg
A new vision of Front Street.


Yesterday, there was no mistaking Councillor Adam Vaughan’s undertone for anything but indignant pride. He couldn’t quite manage to mask it, if indeed he was even trying; it was of the sort a proud uncle might exude when reintroducing to society a formerly wayward nephew who, with uncle’s guidance, has finally managed to shake the old seedy dress and manners.
Vaughan (Trinity-Spadina) was front and centre at Metro Hall on Tuesday morning to help launch the Entertainment District Business Improvement Area‘s new Master Plan [PDF]. The focus is on nurturing the evolution of the downtown area commonly known as “clubland,” from a weekday place to drive through and weekend mega-danceteria to a place of true community and a destination space in its own right; back to the future of a full, balanced, and civil neighborhood, the way it used to be decades ago. In a simple way, it is to acknowledge and develop an environment where real people actually live and work. “The era of the big box nightclub is over,” Vaughan said, nearly triumphantly. As the perceived arch-enemy of the district’s nightclub moguls, he’s forced them to shape up (through aggressive enforcement of safety and noise by-laws) or ship out—and many of them have indeed moved out, further west—in order to transform the area’s reputation as “a dumping ground for grubby, strange, behaviour.”


TED-pm-richmond-st_1c-before.jpg

TED-pm-richmond-st_1c.jpg
Top, Richmond Street as it is today; bottom, the more pedestrian-friendly version.


Some nightclubs have joined the BIA as stakeholders, but the Master Plan will insist on retail and mixed-use spaces going forward. Buildings of historical significance, distinct character areas, and current height patterns will be protected. New plazas will grow in presently unused lots. The transformation process is a broad collaboration including local developers, various business owners, the councillor’s office, and the growing number of residents in the immediate area who Vaughan points to as the real leaders behind this reimagination effort. He was somewhat sketchy on the details about financing—”culture is our business and business is our culture”—but allowed that there will be some fees to developers, and that public investment will be relatively small, considering the returns. He refrained from announcing a specific timeline for the grand project’s completion.
TED-pm-adelaide-st_1b-before.jpg

TED-pm-adelaide-st_1b.jpg
Top, Adelaide Street as it is today; bottom, the new vision.


Central to the plan is the remaking of John Street as the north–south spine of a new conduit for culture and celebration. It’s to be the main corridor spanning a region from the AGO all the way down to Rogers Centre and the waterfront. The new vision rebalances vehicular traffic priorities; it’s going to be more pedestrian-friendly, with wider sidewalks, transplanted greenery (similar to models imagined for new Jarvis Street) and new park spaces. From time to time, parts of the streets will be closed down so that people can take over. The mindset is to create a natural home and festival space for events such as Luminato, the Toronto International Film Festival, and other cultural attractions. In the end, this area is to be a defining space, Toronto’s cultural engine, akin to New York’s Broadway or London’s West End. To many outsiders, Toronto lacks a certain swoon-inducing grace, but the makeover’s underway. At the very least we’ll be charming.
All images courtesy of the Entertainment District BIA.

Comments

  • http://undefined Ben

    The Adelaide rendering at the bottom doesn’t seem right. I was led to believe that it would be a swingin’ 2-way street, rather than its current 1-directional self.

  • H.C. Tinglin

    Fair comment, Ben. At the press conference it was mentioned — but I wouldn’t say with any real conviction — that they would look to move to two-way traffic at least on Richmond.
    These are the images they provided for us but I don’t think they’re set in stone; it’s more a kind of peek at the general idea/direction street-vistawise. The next stage is more technical designs and studies.

  • http://undefined Brando

    I am sure the wider sidewalks will be a great addition, so long as ambitious bouncers don’t continue to police them as their own.

  • http://undefined H.C. Tinglin

    lol! There’s been quite the crackdown on that sort of activity. I wonder if there’s been a study on how a lineup encourages more people to try to get in (esp when the place is essentially empty). Lineup = bees to honey or flies on…?

  • http://undefined joelphillips

    The right-hand lane of Adelaide is a bike route into downtown for a lot of people. It would be a shame to lose it.

  • http://www.pragmatic.ca Greg Smith

    “…back to the future of a full, balanced, and civil neighborhood, the way it used to be decades ago.”
    Can anyone back this nostalgia up with personal recollection? I wasn’t alive (or was too young and suburban to know the difference) decades ago, so I have no idea how fantastically nice the neighbourhood used to be. I thought the area that’s dominated by clubs now was mostly abandoned industrial space in the 70s and 80s?

  • http://undefined fantasygoat

    Queen West, in the 70′s and 80′s, was indeed a wasteland of industrial businesses – that’s why Active Surplus and the tool store are there, they used to cater to those business before the hipsters moved in.
    The clubs moved to the area because of noise complaints in other parts of the city – I believe most of the clubs used to be around Ryerson and up on Yonge street. Queen West was completely deserted after 6pm and no one lived within 3 blocks of the Adelaide corridor, and there were lots of large, empty warehouses spaces, so it was perfect for clubs.

  • http://www.pragmatic.ca Greg Smith

    So, it was neither full nor balanced… but it was civil insofar as there was nothing going on?

  • http://undefined H.C. Tinglin

    Greg, mayhaps it may’ve been better that I put “many” before the word, “decades.” I got this from Vaughan and I gather he was talking about the ’50s and thereabouts. There actually used to be homes on Richmond across from where the Hooters is now. Ask your parents?

  • http://www.pragmatic.ca Greg Smith

    Good idea. Last time I asked older people about what Toronto used to be like in that era, I got an earful about rampant day-and-night drunk driving and frequent casual sexual assault on the streetcars. So much for “Toronto the good”! At least in the modern entertainment district it’s only a huge problem at night. Maybe that’s progress?
    I’m generally suspicious of nostalgic laments about how wonderful things used to be in the by-gone golden ages of gentility and sweetness. Of course when them what do the lamenting were young, they were the perpetrators of much of the same wrongdoing they complain about from today’s kids. Then, it was fun; now, it’s a blight.

  • http://undefined torontothegreat

    There is actually a sales term for that, it’s called The Jones Effect (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keeping_up_with_the_Joneses)
    It definitely works too!

  • http://undefined spacejack

    They should turn the area into a gated community for clubbers on weekends. But rather than keeping people out, it should keep the people inside from escaping until early Monday morning.

  • http://undefined Paul Kishimoto

    I thought the same thing. The renderings are beautiful (especially the trees!) but cycling infrastructure is conspicuously absent.

  • http://undefined rek

    Where are the toll booths for vehicles coming from the 905?

  • http://undefined Vincent Clement

    I love how the renderings show mature trees not interfering with the overhead streetcar wires.

  • http://undefined Vincent Clement

    Especially when you see plenty of parked bicycles in the ‘Today’ pictures. Oops?

  • http://undefined TokyoTuds

    Yes, Vincent, there are very good arguments against trees on city streets in any case.
    http://www.carfree.com/design/stwd100.html
    Cheers,
    Tuds

  • http://undefined TokyoTuds

    I agree cycling should be integrated onto every main street.

  • http://undefined mikeyteeth

    this is a great plan. vaughn’s vision of the city is spot on.

  • http://undefined AR

    It seems to follow the notorious precedent of the Bloor Yorkville BIA.

  • http://undefined AR

    You sound serious, yet that link provides no argument relevant to the situation. I’ll remember to let the BIA know not to plant miniature trees by our non-existent grand monuments in the area.
    Arguments in favour include:
    -shade is more comfortable for pedestrians in the summer heat.
    -Greenery is beautiful in an environment of overwhelmingly hard, man-made surfaces
    -adds a dose of sophistication to a streetscape because of the added complexity of designing a space for the tree to grow
    But above all else, all overhead wires should be eliminated from the area. This is absolutely crucial. And no cheesy quasi-historic lighting…