Today Thu Fri
It is forcast to be Mostly Cloudy at 10:00 PM EST on February 08, 2012
Mostly Cloudy
2°/-2°
It is forcast to be Clear at 10:00 PM EST on February 09, 2012
Clear
5°/0°
It is forcast to be Mostly Cloudy at 10:00 PM EST on February 10, 2012
Mostly Cloudy
6°/-15°

6 Comments

news

Roger’s Miscommunications


If you’ve ever been watching television and immediately jumped to back up the DVR lest your eyes had deceived you (a certain Super Bowl halftime performance perhaps?), yesterday’s broadcast of Sportsnet’s Hockey Central may have been one of those moments.
Reporting from a Flames vs. Blackhawks game in Chicago yesterday, Sportsnet’s Roger Millions suddently entered the YouTube On-Air Gaffe Hall of Fame when he stumbled on his words and uttered an unfortunate epithet (NSFW) characteristic of gay porn or the witness lineup in The Usual Suspects. Still, this is the land of the true north strong and free, where grownups are allowed to watch The Osbournes and The Sopranos unbleeped, so it’s hardly the worst thing to cross our airwaves. (That would be Train 48.)
Though the broadcast was live, the cock-up was likely the fault of a VTR tech, who probably cued up the wrong prerecorded take in a single, career-limiting instant. It could either have been an honest boner or an backstage staffer bent on hanging the journalist out to dry, but don’t feel too embarrassed for Roger Millions—with a name like that, he is rubber and everything else is glue. Plus, he was doing so well!
Rogers is attempting damage control by pulling the YouTube clips claiming copyright infringement, but they should be happy they aren’t Comcast—back in February, someone penetrated their Super Bowl broadcast in the Arizona area with thirty seconds of a guy flapping his junk around (NSFW). Outraged sports fans who put their beer down long enough to complain received a $10 credit from the cable company for that which could not be unseen.

Filed under: , , , , , , ,

Report an error Send a tip

Comments

  • http://null joeclark

    It can’t be “copyright infringement”: As the clip is an insubstantial portion duplicated for news reporting, it is cleared, up front without permission, under fair dealing, which the Supremes ruled has to be interpreted expansively.
    Hence, Marc, if Rogers assholes try to hassle you about posting this clip, remind them of what any articling student would already know and stay the course.

  • http://www.bitpicture.com Marc Lostracco

    I didn’t post this particular clip to YouTube, but the problem is with how YouTube handles takedown notices, which all came to a head with the Warner Music debacle. When YouTube gets an arbitrary flag to take down material under a copyright claim, it is diabled automatically and immediately and then the onus is on the person who posted it to submit a copyright dispute, which is reviewed before reinstatement.
    Most people get intimidated by the or just don’t bother, so the clip comes down. Most recently notable, the National Organization for Marriage in the U.S.—orginators of this month’s notorious anti-gay-marriage bogeyman ad—even got news reports removed from YouTube because the pieces showed clips from the embarrassing audition tapes.
    Even though stuff like this will continue to reproduce like Tribbles on YouTube faster than Rogers can slam down copyright claims, the trigger happy takedowns are mainly a YouTube problem.

  • http://www.theurbancountry.com James D. Schwartz

    Marc, this is hilarious. I watched it 4 times in a row, and it was funnier each time ;)
    What makes it even more hilarious is the brief reaction you can hear from the in-studio commentators. It quickly went from a chuckle to a “let’s change the topic really quickly and pretend this never happened”

  • http://www.theurbancountry.com James D. Schwartz

    I just saw another video with more of the in-studio chatter: “Roger Millions uhh obviously reporting from Chicago.. with a bit of a… a blooper uh.. on that one..”
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-6hsM5yRac

  • http://undefined EricSmith

    … the trigger happy takedowns are mainly a YouTube problem.

    Not quite sure what you mean by that, but the “shoot first” approach is encouraged by the American
    Digital Millennium Copyright Act (see the second paragraph of the section I linked to) and any organization large enough to have lawyers on retainer is likely to behave as YouTube does.

  • http://undefined Gauldar

    We now interrupt our broadcast of large men grunting and piling up on each other.