Today Thu Fri
It is forcast to be Clear at 11:00 PM EDT on June 19, 2013
Clear
23°/11°
It is forcast to be Clear at 11:00 PM EDT on June 20, 2013
Clear
19°/13°
It is forcast to be Mostly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on June 21, 2013
Mostly Cloudy
21°/16°

7 Comments

news

Fashion Week Fall 2009 Collections: Day Two

IMG_0495.jpg
All-white (a refreshing change from the usual, well, opposite) at Travis Taddeo. Photo by Stefania Yarhi.


If you’ve been looking for Canada’s own Alexander Wang, you can rest your eyes now. Travis Taddeo has arrived. Let’s do a little point-by-point, shall we?
Wang hangs around the Lower East Side of Manhattan; Taddeo inhabits the Plateau, the Montrealer’s East Village equivalent. Wang’s BFFs are models, the likes of super-hyphenate Erin Wasson; Taddeo‘s are just as uniformly skinny, though (we have to guess) for a different reason. Both Wang and Taddeo are well under 30 and just as well on their ways to contemporary design stardom. Both are more than a little in love with blue denim, black leather, and the ’90s, though Wang tends more to grunge, Taddeo to nu-rave. (Thankfully, for fall 2009, the latter kept his neon dimmed to an electric indigo the colour of a blue raspberry freezie.) And while Wang officially “made it” with the 2008 CFDA Fashion Fund, Taddeo counts Brooklyn Brownstone of the FDCC (different letters, similar thing) among his very important pals.
Last and most importantly, we point to Jonathan + Olivia, the Ossington outpost of a Vancouver-born streetwear boutique and one of the best spots in the city for dream-closet building. Wouldn’t those Travis Taddeo mesh-and-leather leggings rack up nicely over there, next to Alexander Wang’s coolly cropped tees? Case, rested.


IMG_0581.jpg
Models getting L’Oreal made-up backstage. Photo by Stefania Yarhi.


Feet, not so. Stylistas en masse chose Day Two of LGFW to break out back-breaking shoes, from pneumatic platforms to strapped and studded sandals. Posing for a street-style shot just outside the tent, a jaguar-esque model attempt to show off her six-inch oxfords in motion—but tripped with just one faux step. Let that be a lesson to lesser creatures.
At Zoran Dobric, the Town Shoes were surprisingly sober—black, low-shine, classic leather pumps. Perhaps the designer wanted to avoid distraction from his signature silk-screened prints, which this year took on monochromatic hues and art-meets-tech forms. “Electro Klimt,” if Dobric does say so himself, and he does, in his show notes.
While the Serb’s painterly dedication to his prints is always impressive, so is his uncanny ability to make any shape (from micro-tunic to A-line shift) look, well, shapeless. Even with this season’s avowed dedication to minimalism, he’s still not making anything remotely body-flattering.
Besides, what he’s doing for men is more interesting: shorts over leggings, a sheer white tee under a black blazer, the lapels adorned with cumberband-style buckles, and a stone-grey cardigan with black zipper exposed. With innovations like that, who needs Bustle? The menswear extravaganza is equal parts pimp and primp (think three-piece pinstripes and too much purple) and always leaves us particularly thankful for our X chromosomes. This year, we take a pass.

fashionweekday2_1.jpg
Two good looks from Joeffer Caoc. Photos by Stefania Yarhi.


But of course, we stay for Joeffer. (It’s our fourth Fashion Week, so we’re long past using the last names of local designers, even the ones we’ve never actually met.)
In the past, we’ve wished the master minimalist would take a few more risks—one-shouldered dresses and sharp pantsuits are great, but can’t he do more? The answer we get is yes, but not well. Experiments in gold and silver lamé are (for the most part) best described sans accent égu, if you catch our drift. And Edwardian-shouldered jackets and dresses are well and great, but is a time machine free with purchase? Because you’d have to go back three seasons for this trend to be a trend. We do appreciate the vamped-up styling efforts, though, with models’ shins and forearms slicked in black PVC—the “leather” of this recessionary season.
This week’s comeback kid is Linda Lundström, who seems to have lost her first name along with her company when it went into bankruptcy last year. The leaner new label is just Lundström, and it targets a younger customer, perhaps one with fewer kids and more disposable income. Starting with coats, the removable trim available in real or faux fur, the modern woman’s wardrobe is delayered and reduced to easy jersey pieces in comforting neutrals. There are a few party tricks too, cocktail dresses all flouncy and flapper-like, but the kind of girl who’d wear those would probably just hit up Le Chateau for cheap frills.
So, a success? We’re not sold, but here’s Jen McNeely of She Does The City—27, blonde, and urbane, a tireless gad-about-town; in other words, the ideal customer—tweeting approval: “I used to think Lundstrom was my mom circa 1987. Now I think it’s more me 2009.”
If She’s a fan, will The City follow? Lundström can only hope and sew.
After the show, we find one of those rarest birds: the sort who take international flights to come to Toronto’s Fashion Week. Littler birds at the FDCC have been telling us about these foreign visitors for seasons now, but we’d yet to see and believe. Now, after talking to Alessandro from Conde Nast, we do. The lavishly after-shaved gentleman tells us he’s been scouting out our scene for the international Vogues (Germany, Italia, and so on) and while he can’t pick a favourite show, he says he loves our city. About three times. Either he really loves it, or he just doesn’t know any other phrases from the guidebook.

picresized_rsz_3364955882_e67b8ef9d8_b.jpg
Mustard yellow and metallic PVC at Lundstrom. Photo by Studiolit.


At Heart Truth, Canadian leading ladies—of society and the small screen, mostly—wear red dresses by their favourite designers. And as the show goes on, two sets of thumbs race: NOW mag’s Andrew Sardone and the Toronto Star‘s Derick Chetty compete for best live-to-Twitter updates. Sardone: “Love Damzels. Tara Spencer Nairn is a little bit country is puff sleeves and crinoline.” Chetty: “Tara from Corner Gas mooned everyone. Great bloomers.”
Winner? In the clear, it’s Sardone, who gets a cool gazillion points for zinging Mrs. Harper not once (“Sitting across from the PM’s wife. Whoop-di-do”) but twice (“Didn’t notice until now that the PM wife’s suit is covered in sparkles. Classy!”).

Comments

  • http://null montauk

    I’m not sure if this is a criticism or not – I am concerned that it moreso betrays my total ignorance about the Toronto fashion scene, but I can’t understand significant portions of these fashion week posts. I read them diligently but I still feel like I’m missing things that everyone else probably gets. For example:
    - what is a super-hyphenate
    - what is Taddeo’s different reason for skinny models
    - what is nu-rave
    - what does “rack up nicely” mean
    - what is a “jaguar-esque” model, and what do you mean about lesser creatures?
    - “Electro Klimt,” if Dobric does say so himself, and he does, in his show notes.”

  • http://s-nicole.blogspot.com Sarah Nicole Prickett

    i’m in between shows, so answering this as fast as humanly possible.
    in order:
    - have you seen the cinematic classic “zoolander”? know what a “slashie” is? “hyphenate” is the same thing. in this case, erin wasson is a model-stylist-muse-designer etc. so many things, hence the prefix “super-”
    - not models; i’m saying taddeo’s pals are as skinny as models, but for a different reason. it’s not a reason i can print. sorry.
    - nu-rave is in the goddamn urban dictionary! and wikipedia!
    - “rack up nicely” is one of my weird plays on phrases, in this case, “stack up nicely.” clothes are hung on racks. dear god, i feel stupid just explaining this.
    - “jaguar-esque” = “like a jaguar.” she was long and slinky and black. “lesser creatures” = “non jaguar-esque people, i.e. non-models”
    - “electro Klimt” is how the designer described his own show, in his show notes. what are you missing here?
    - “who needs Bustle?” means “who needs Bustle?” perhaps i should have linked to the brand’s website. i just didn’t want them to find (and hate) me via this post.
    - “hope and sew” is just… “hope and sew.”
    - FDCC = Fashion Design Council of Canada. no shots taken here.
    - Heart Truth is… OH MY GOD. I’M SORRY I WRITE THESE POSTS IN THE MIDDLE OF DOING A MILLION OTHER THINGS AND I DON’T HAVE TIME TO LINK EVERY BLOODY PROPER NOUN. HAVE YOU HEARD OF THE LITTLE SEARCH ENGINE THAT COULD? IT’S GOOGLE. TRY IT.
    - deep breath. sorry. yes, Denis Gagnon is a designer. avant-garde womenswear is exactly that: womenswear that can be described as avant-garde, which is a french word that even people in texas have probably heard on tv.
    - emptied wine glasses could fool people into thinking it’s nighttime, i.e. heavier drinking time… sigh. i don’t know. am i the stupid one here?
    - who’s self-congratulating? certainly not me, right now.
    - is the Holt Renfrew party actually in Holt Renfrew? yes. it is. if your next question is “what is Holt Renfrew?” well, so help me god, i will hunt you down and seriously, seriously maim you.
    - the other three are actually four. four other major canadian designers whose names i didn’t feel like remembering when i wrote this. and yes, they were marketed – by the FDCC, as stated – as the “Group of Seven” in Canadian fashion.
    - David Dixon is not a “what”; he’s a designer, something I feel I made obvious via the many descriptions of his fashion show? no?
    - “@SomeoneStandingRightBehindHer” was a Twitter joke of sorts.
    ok, now please stop reading my posts. you’re hurting yourself.

  • http://www.torontoist.com David Topping

    One day, Torontoist will release The Annotated Prickett, and it will read basically just like that.

  • rugby lad

    Total knee jerk reaaction to those fur stoles. They look ridiculous. I thought fur was dead. Apparently, it came back.

  • http://null montauk

    Wow. Wasn’t expecting that thorough a response. I’d say thank you but you said you might want to maim me so I feel like thanking you would be masochistic.
    - Haven’t seen Zoolander.
    - “Rack up nicely” to me connotes accumulation (e.g., “I racked up all these charges”). I thought of the clothing rack thing, but I dismissed it because I thought “these clothes would look nice on racks near each other” was an odd observation.
    - “Jaguar-esque” – hm, I get the long and slinky, but I didn’t think jaguars were black. I picture them sort of spotty and growly, although I admit I have not seen one in person (a jaguar, that is, not a black person). And I don’t really get the non-models = lesser creatures thing. A) because I don’t really get the humour in designating non-models as lesser creatures, and B) because I thought the model was the one who fell, so isn’t that a lesson to…superior creatures? Jaguars? Antelopes?
    - “Electro Klimt” — I was confused by the “if he may say so, and he does” wording. My bad.
    - I don’t mind Googling. I also don’t mind looking things up in Wikipedia. I know my options. I didn’t ask for a response, in fact I openly admitted that my questions didn’t warrant one. I just wanted to note the sort of thing that I, a non-fashionista reader, struggle with in these posts.
    - First, “avant-garde” is not nearly so ubiquitous as you imply. Secondly, what I meant was: what does it mean to be an avant-garde designer? Isn’t all fashion design supposed to be avant-garde? Or am I off the ball here?
    - I think it’s okay for me to ask if it was taking place in Holt Renfrew. I thought Holt Renfrew was probably just the corporate sponsor. I found it really odd that there’d be a cocktail party in a department store. Maybe that happens all the time in the fashion industry. I don’t know.
    - I’m sure “David Dixon” was perfectly obvious to other readers.
    You know, I could tell you to stop writing your posts because you’re hurting yourself, but I wouldn’t do that, because a) it would be rude, wouldn’t it, and b) it would be untrue. It’s nice that there’s a fashion feature in Torontoist and I like reading it and feeling like I’ve learned a little. I read your blog periodically, for example, (I’ve also started reading NotCouture and Style Bubble, to round out my self-education in the fashion industry) and I manage just fine, although I don’t always share your tastes (for Balenciaga, for example). But I had a pretty hard time with these posts. So I’m really sorry if I made you feel like I was slamming your post and being a dick. That really wasn’t my intention.

  • http://undefined rek

    Come down off the catwalk, Sarah, and put away your claws.

  • http://undefined spacejack

    I think the girl in the first photo is handling the rodent attack surprisingly well.