Today Sun Mon
It is forcast to be Mostly Cloudy at 11:00 PM EDT on May 26, 2012
Mostly Cloudy
27°/17°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 27, 2012
Chance of Rain
26°/20°
It is forcast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 11:00 PM EDT on May 28, 2012
Chance of a Thunderstorm
32°/20°

9 Comments

news

Eye Don’t Need No Stinking Relevant Ads

20090217eyewebsiteads.jpg
Last week Eye Weekly launched its newly redesigned website, a bland, nondescript piece of work with which we were, at the time, less than impressed. Aside from its use of a puny font that borders on illegible for all but the eagle-eyed, our biggest quibble with the site was its lack of a distinct visual identity to set it apart from its competitors. Days later, Eye‘s online team has solved that particular problem; unfortunately, eyeweekly.com’s new unique identity is “the website with the annoying, irrelevant, and nonsensical hyperlink ads peppered throughout every article”—which, we assume, is not exactly what they were going for.
Granted, the in-article advertisements—provided by Chitika Linx—aren’t always completely useless. The ad program knows, for example, that the phrase “hand-jobbing Rahm Emanuel” has a tenuous connection to the topic of romance, and helpfully provides a link to dating site match.com. On the other hand, what the mention of World War I in a theatre review has to do with laser eye surgery is beyond us.
In fifteen minutes spent browsing Eye‘s website yesterday, nearly the only contextually relevant advertising we encountered was a banner ad for hardcore porn in the adult personals section (link very, very not safe for work). For the site’s own good, this inadvertent image rejig most definitely needs a rethink.

Filed under: , , , , ,

Report error Send a tip

Comments

  • http://null dowlingm

    Firefox + NoScript + mark chitika.com Untrusted = Win!

  • http://undefined rek

    This is what Ad Block Pro is for.

  • http://undefined wondererer

    This is why Torontoist is needed. At this rate, Big Media are 30 years away from making a good website.

  • http://null spacejack

    Looks like they got rid of it. TOist has had some bad ad debacles as well, if I recall.
    In the future, all websites will be blogs.

  • http://undefined mister j

    I just realized that there aren’t ANY ads on Torontoist

  • http://null rek

    The whole web is now ad-free.

  • http://null jessplease

    Unrelated, but I’ve enjoyed hate reading Kate Carraway articles since she wrote this: http://torontoist.com/2009/02/eye_dont_need_no_stinking.php

  • http://undefined torontothegreat

    ‘relevant’ links such as these (relevant ads) are one of the most annoying ideas on the web.

  • http://null fearofcorners

    Is it bland? The top banner area is a little flat but the rest of the site is well designed. Don’t fear the white space!