Rocket Talk: Can Sunday Subway Service Start Sooner?
Gender Studies Coming to a High School Near You
Please Insert Station and Try Again
The Art of Not Knowing
If You Tweet It, He Will Come
Torontoist is ending the year by naming our Heroes and Villains of 2008--the people, places, and things that we've either fallen head over heels in love with or developed uncontrollable rage towards over the past twelve months, with one hero and one villain selected by each participating staff member. On Christmas Day: the heroes. On Boxing Day: the villains. And next week, cast your vote to determine the Superhero and Supervillain of the year.
East Toronto Community Coalition
Back in April, a SmartCentres VP bemoaned to Christopher Hume that "It's easier to do 10 malls in the 905 than one in an urban centre." Good. This is as it should be, and it's thanks to groups like the East Toronto Community Coalition that it's true. A ruling on the contended Leslieville site will be handed down by the Ontario Municipal Board any day now, and regardless of which way it goes, the ETCC and its partners deserve congratulations for putting up one hell of a fight against the free-marketeers who believe that the operative principles of city planning should not be sustainability, community consensus-building, the decisions of elected leaders, or even sensitivity to or regard for context, but rather the narrow interests of the party with the most lawyers. Instead of allowing the invisible hand to carve its grooves into the landscape, the ETCC organized, incorporated, countered the spin, and became a real presence at the OMB, the kind of intelligent, concerted grassroots force that every neighbourhood should have. The issues include whether the City should have sovereignty over its own planning, be able to set its own environmental and transportation standards, and make judgements that some kinds of employment are more desirable than others—"an insoluble disagreement on the essential nature of work and the meaning of geography," as Mike Smith put it. We would go further, however, and say that it's a fight for the very ideas of possibility and hope, of agency, and of meaning itself. When Val Dodge wrote about the tussle in April, commenter pman remarked, "A higher value, more urban use would be nice, but maybe not feasible given Toronto's precarious economic status....Harvard is building something like 10 million square feet in a new science campus in Allston (not unlike Leslieville), which will be transformational for Boston and maybe the world. But that sort of thing will never happen here....And while we might wish for a different city, the one we've got is overwhelmingly auto-centric pretty much everywhere and certainly in that neighbourhood." Well, here we have people actively fighting to make Toronto that "different city." Please preach your apathy elsewhere. BY JONATHAN GOLDSBIE; PHOTO BY GEORGIE_GRRL FROM THE TORONTOIST FLICKR POOL
add to stumble upon
add to reddit
tweet this
post to facebook
Is it any surprise that Jack Layton is a Torontoist "hero"?
In one you refer to Stephane Dion as a joke, then another as a hero. I don't think he is either, but he's the single reason Harper got cockier and more reckless. As for the Clarity Act, big deal - Harper was as much an architect as he was.
High gas prices may be heroic for the environment, but that's all wiped out but the current sub 70 cent levels isn't it?
I like the choice of Bikes and Social Media.
PickleToes, is it any surprise you were the first to comment on this post?
Gauldar: A little, but I knew that you and rek were really the only other contenders.
"...all of this and more was just proof that we can be a very, very stupid country when we want to be. Remember, Dion pretty much wrote the Clarity Act all by himself, which put the sovereignty movement in Quebec to bed for a decade until Stephen Harper decided to open his stupid mouth earlier this year."
YES! Just wish the mainstream media in this country agreed. They really did their best to regurgitate all of Harpers' talking points about the 'weak leadership' of Dion and, sadly, Canadians bought it.
I have feeling the media's tune will change with the new appointed Liberal leader. He's pro-Bush Doctrine, pro-torture and has spent the last 30 years outside of this country but our press will conveniently ignore those facts.
Speaking of facts, here's the opposite of one: "As for the Clarity Act, big deal - Harper was as much an architect as he was."
Dion was both a hero and a villain. It was contingent on him, as leader, to get his message across. He failed miserably at every turn. He's a good parliamentarian and a worthless leader. The Green Shift is great policy, it's unfortunate that he didn't step aside to let a more competent leader sell it.
Ironic that a guy who wrote something called the Clarity Act would be such an incomprehensible communicator. His awful leadership resulted in the greater success of both Harper and Layton, as the Liberal's bled support on both sides. That'll end with Ignatieff, Harper will be pushed to the right and Layton can return to being an irrelevant shouty fringe element.
Thanks for the love, Torontoist :) Newmindspace loves you too.
From Harper's wikipedia entry:
In late 1999, Harper called for the federal government to establish clear rules for any future Quebec referendum on sovereignty.[35] Some have identified Harper's views as an influence on the Chrétien government's Clarity Act.
Public Space Zealots
The radicals responsible for the decline of individual property rights. Yeah, they sound like heroes to me....
How about activists obsessed with creating communism through fascist methods?
Does anyone know about a greasemonkey application that can block comments from trolls? Killfile only works for LJ.
(No, I'm serious.)
@garden_hoe21: This past summer, someone wrote a Greasemonkey script specifically for banning Torontoist commenters of your choice.
*gasp* That's amazing! Thank you!!
David: Haha wow. I'm a preset too!
*kisses you*
Did Svend just cite conjecture on wikipedia in order to prove his point?
Union: If I wasn't so confident about the quality of his character, I'd conjecture that he edited the wikipedia article and added in that paragraph.
http://www2.parl.gc.ca/content/hoc/Bills/352/Private/C-341/C-341_1/C-341_1.pdf
This is the Quebec Contingency Act that Harper put forward in 1996 as a private member's bill, a precursor to the similar Clarity Act that Dion produced.
1996...hmmmm. Was that 'Quebec Is A Nation Harper'? Or 'Erect a Firewall Around Alberta Harper'?'Elect the Senate Harper'? Wait it was 'The Government needs the support of the House Harper'!
Dion and Chretien, two Québécois, got their ideas for dealing with Quebec sovereignists from the leader of a western protest party. Got it.
Yes, people can agree on one thing while disagreeing on several others.
Dion, Chretien, Harper all supported the Clarity Act - they share a strong stance in dealing with Quebec separatists just as Trudeau did before them. Did you even read Harper's bill?
I strongly disagree with your choice of East Toronto Community Coalition as a hero. They don't represent the interests of the community as a whole, just the interests of a narrow(minded) subset, as shown here and here.
totally agree. But this is Torontoist we're talking about so you come to expect it after a while.