Roy Halladay
In a year that saw a surprise federal election called two years early, our parliament prorogued, and a major university locked in an indefinite strike, there's a simple nobility to someone who shows up every day with the desire to finish what they start. There's nobody in this fair city that performs their job as consistently, stoically, and dare we say heroically as Roy Halladay. Granted, his job is pitching for the Toronto Blue Jays, but that’s no easy task these days, what with a shrinking fan base, plummeting pay roll, and the infuriating supermarket sweep that has been the New York Yankees' off-season.
Doc has been the only consistent element on the Jays this millennium, and he had a whale of a season again in 2008. The six-foot-six gentle giant won twenty games, struck out 206, and achieved a sparse ERA of 2.78, all for a club that logged another in a long line of middling seasons. Halladay's numbers would certainly have been good enough to earn him his second Cy Young award in any season where Cleveland's Cliff Lee hadn't gone through some sort of genetic mutation. But in a way naming him the best pitcher in the league fails to do justice to his unique skill set—he may just be the best pitcher of the age. (And he pitches as if he's from another age altogether.) Halladay recorded nine complete games this season, far more than any other pitcher and more than the pitching staff of twenty-seven entire teams. Every time Doc throws the first pitch of a game, he plans on throwing the last pitch as well.
There's been murmuring these past months, most notably from
über-cynical Globe columnist Jeff Blair, that the Jays should trade Halladay with an eye towards rebuilding for the future. This would be a disastrous decision. While there seems be little chance of the Jays contending next year, with or without their star, Halladay's workhorse ways are, in themselves, a reason for fans to continue to watch and hope. (Nobody's going to suggest that, say, the United States ditch Barack Obama, even though the country seems destined to continue its downward economic spiral.) Toronto needs to hold onto Halladay at all costs—at least until his commitment to excellence and hard work inspires both York University and the Conservative government to get back to the mound and finish what they started.
BY MITCHELL CUSHMAN; PHOTO BY NATHAN DENNETTE/ AP
Is it any surprise that Jack Layton is a Torontoist "hero"?
In one you refer to Stephane Dion as a joke, then another as a hero. I don't think he is either, but he's the single reason Harper got cockier and more reckless. As for the Clarity Act, big deal - Harper was as much an architect as he was.
High gas prices may be heroic for the environment, but that's all wiped out but the current sub 70 cent levels isn't it?
I like the choice of Bikes and Social Media.
PickleToes, is it any surprise you were the first to comment on this post?
Gauldar: A little, but I knew that you and rek were really the only other contenders.
"...all of this and more was just proof that we can be a very, very stupid country when we want to be. Remember, Dion pretty much wrote the Clarity Act all by himself, which put the sovereignty movement in Quebec to bed for a decade until Stephen Harper decided to open his stupid mouth earlier this year."
YES! Just wish the mainstream media in this country agreed. They really did their best to regurgitate all of Harpers' talking points about the 'weak leadership' of Dion and, sadly, Canadians bought it.
I have feeling the media's tune will change with the new appointed Liberal leader. He's pro-Bush Doctrine, pro-torture and has spent the last 30 years outside of this country but our press will conveniently ignore those facts.
Speaking of facts, here's the opposite of one: "As for the Clarity Act, big deal - Harper was as much an architect as he was."
Dion was both a hero and a villain. It was contingent on him, as leader, to get his message across. He failed miserably at every turn. He's a good parliamentarian and a worthless leader. The Green Shift is great policy, it's unfortunate that he didn't step aside to let a more competent leader sell it.
Ironic that a guy who wrote something called the Clarity Act would be such an incomprehensible communicator. His awful leadership resulted in the greater success of both Harper and Layton, as the Liberal's bled support on both sides. That'll end with Ignatieff, Harper will be pushed to the right and Layton can return to being an irrelevant shouty fringe element.
Thanks for the love, Torontoist :) Newmindspace loves you too.
From Harper's wikipedia entry:
In late 1999, Harper called for the federal government to establish clear rules for any future Quebec referendum on sovereignty.[35] Some have identified Harper's views as an influence on the Chrétien government's Clarity Act.
Public Space Zealots
The radicals responsible for the decline of individual property rights. Yeah, they sound like heroes to me....
How about activists obsessed with creating communism through fascist methods?
Does anyone know about a greasemonkey application that can block comments from trolls? Killfile only works for LJ.
(No, I'm serious.)
@garden_hoe21: This past summer, someone wrote a Greasemonkey script specifically for banning Torontoist commenters of your choice.
*gasp* That's amazing! Thank you!!
David: Haha wow. I'm a preset too!
*kisses you*
Did Svend just cite conjecture on wikipedia in order to prove his point?
Union: If I wasn't so confident about the quality of his character, I'd conjecture that he edited the wikipedia article and added in that paragraph.
http://www2.parl.gc.ca/content/hoc/Bills/352/Private/C-341/C-341_1/C-341_1.pdf
This is the Quebec Contingency Act that Harper put forward in 1996 as a private member's bill, a precursor to the similar Clarity Act that Dion produced.
1996...hmmmm. Was that 'Quebec Is A Nation Harper'? Or 'Erect a Firewall Around Alberta Harper'?'Elect the Senate Harper'? Wait it was 'The Government needs the support of the House Harper'!
Dion and Chretien, two Québécois, got their ideas for dealing with Quebec sovereignists from the leader of a western protest party. Got it.
Yes, people can agree on one thing while disagreeing on several others.
Dion, Chretien, Harper all supported the Clarity Act - they share a strong stance in dealing with Quebec separatists just as Trudeau did before them. Did you even read Harper's bill?
I strongly disagree with your choice of East Toronto Community Coalition as a hero. They don't represent the interests of the community as a whole, just the interests of a narrow(minded) subset, as shown here and here.
totally agree. But this is Torontoist we're talking about so you come to expect it after a while.