"Despite our ongoing Gawker fetish, Toronto will never have anything remotely close to it."

When Eye published an article in August about how Toronto has no Gawker equivalent, and specifically faulted us for "all-consuming earnestness" and being unable to address the city's "gore," we didn't really have anything to say about it. Torontoist co-founder and NOW Online Editor Josh Errett does, though: in this week's issue of the already Torontoist-heavy mag, Errett cuts to the chase, chronicling the creation of Torontoist as proof positive that something like Gawker couldn't exist here, in no small part because of the "bizarre hypersensitivity of some of our best about-towns."

Email This Entry


Comments (4) [rss]

I don't think anyone cares anough about canadian media figures to bother reading about the dirt in their lives. It's not that we're nice, we're just not interested.

Does anyone really care about Ted Rogers' private life?

user-pic

Is there an equivalent to "good riddance" for something that doesn't exist?

That much snide smugness just isn't healthy.

Basically boils down to Torontonians not being funny.

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

TIP US OFF

Tip us off with news, leads, links; anything at all.
Subscribe to get events, weather, contests, and stories in your email inbox—daily.

EMAIL (required)

About Torontoist

Torontoist is about Toronto and everything that happens in it. It's edited by David Topping and Marc Lostracco, and you should totally advertise on us.

More about Torontoist.

Get Involved on Torontoist

-->

Recent Comments

The Tall Poppy Interview

Follow Torontoist...