February 28, 2008
Where Are We Running?

Far be it from us to conflate professional sports with Bill Shakespeare—but the Toronto Maple Leafs’ actions before, during and after Tuesday's NHL trade deadline recall Macbeth’s famous words: full of sound and fury, yet ultimately signifying nothing. Charges of heresy will be duly acknowledged.
In the end, the promised blow-up never materialized. None of the five big-money, no-trade-clause-holding players could be moved. Pavel Kubina was apparently ready to be shipped off (to San Jose, if reports are accurate), but after the Leafs mauled the Ottawa Senators on Monday he reneged. (Bryan McCabe was apparently willing to waive his; alas, no one wanted him.) Mats Sundin, meanwhile, decided after much soul-searching that he didn’t want to be a rental player, and that like any good captain he'd go down with the ship. (The subsequent reaction—Sundin being accused of selfishness, of embracing mediocrity, of failing his ultimate leadership test—has been nothing if not predictable…not to mention ironic, since we live in an era in which professional athletes are constantly, and rightly, castigated for being egomaniacal jerks. We’ve belaboured this point already, but Sundin can't win in this city—both literally and metaphorically.) In the end (and, again, with apologies to the Bard), it was all much ado about nothing.
Or very little, anyway: even with his hands tied, Cliff Fletcher managed to parlay a big, lumbering defenceman (Hal Gill) and a couple fringe players (Chad Kilger and Wade Belak) into four draft picks. They weren't spectacular moves (and there’s obviously no guarantee they'll ever pan out) but they're at least steps in the right direction; put slightly different, anything would've been better than nothing. Fletcher also promised that next year’s team will bare scant resemblance to the one that's currently wallowing near the bottom of the NHL standings. Call us blind optimists, but for the first time in years it feels as though Toronto has a general manager with a semblance of a clue—someone who won't be a lapdog for the team's corporate interests. It's a welcome respite, no matter how the rest of this year plays out.
For now, the Leafs are treading water—much like they were last season, when deadline inertia cost them a playoff berth. Yet, after beating Florida 4-3 in a shootout yesterday night, the Leafs are only six points out. Making the playoffs, unfathomable a few weeks ago, is slowly becoming a possibility no matter what certain columnists say. Some people would suggest that sneaking into the playoffs would be counterproductive on the grounds that it'd worsen the team's drafting position come June—but we respectfully disagree. A playoff appearance, no matter how brief, would give the team’s younger players invaluable experience which would jumpstart the eventual rebuilding process. It'd also send a great, big “eff-you” to the team’s many detractors; speaking as lifelong, die-hard fans, the latter would be particularly satisfying.
The Leafs have seventeen games remaining—seventeen games to leapfrog four other teams, including a surging Buffalo Sabres. It's a longshot at best...and having said that (and to extend our theatrical analogy even further), there're still plenty of twists and turns to follow. We'll be waiting with bated breath for what happens next.
Photo by Vincent Ma from the Torontoist Flickr Pool.


The thing that bothered me about Mats not wanting a trade is that he also refused to discuss a contract for next year. I respect his decision enormously, not wanting to be a "rental player" and to go down with the ship, but I really, really hope that if he wants to go (which is evidenced by his unwillingness to enter into talks for a contract for next year), he doesn't leave in his pending free agency - this teams needs all the help they can get to rebuild, and the draft picks and young players we could get him would be a great help.
From what I've seen of him, Mats has always come across as a really decent guy, so I'm sure that if he leaves, he'll do so in such a way that can benefit the team in the future.
Ultimately, however, it's his prerogative. Don't get me wrong, either way, I'll always be grateful to him for the amazing hockey he's played in this town, and how fun he's made this team to watch over the years.
That's a good point--and from the sounds of it, Fletcher wanted to negotiate a contract extension but Sundin refused. I can't imagine him playing anywhere else (even though he used to, once upon a time), but his unwillingness to move/his refusal to sign an extension seems to indicate he's at least considering hanging 'em up after the season is done. I don't see Sundin pulling a Niedermeyer/Selanne, especially given his comments about wanting to be part of a team from October onwards. On the other hand, he's been pretty insistent 'bout staying in Toronto for years.
It's gonna be an interesting offseason, that's for sure.
"full of sound and fury, yet ultimately signifying nothing."
The sound and fury came from the media, from the infinite coverage and speculations. It didnt come from Fletcher - there's not much you can do when a player decides to not waive his no-trade clause. In fact there's nothing you can do. So the players (Kubina, McCabe) are the ones to blame. Not Fletcher, because he wanted them out.
As for Sundin, he's the best and I think he took the best decision. He's the greatest player we've ever had, let's keep that.
Let's see what they do in the summertime.
Go Leafs.
"Baited" breath really only makes sense if you've been eating minnows. The homonym "Bated," meaning lowered or held, is the word to use here.
The Leafs have seventeen games remaining—seventeen games to leapfrog four other teams, including a surging Buffalo Sabres. It's a longshot at best
This is precisely the problem with the Leafs today and last year and the year before. They have an opportunity to rebuild, but they refuse to accept that they are out of it. So what happens? They play themselves out of a playoff hunt and when it all doesn't really matter anymore, play well enough down the stretch to take them out of the draft lottery. It's a double shot of failure.
Quick fix. Cheers.
That's a fair point, nOwak, and it begs a follow-up question: as a fan, would you rather your team tank (which, in this case, would involve a heavy dosage of Andrew Raycroft) or would you rather they go down fighting? I'm torn on this one. Part of me wants the Leafs to lose out and get Steve Stamkos; alas, another part of me was running around the living room after Sundin tied the game against Florida on Wednesday, and it's getting harder for me to supress that side of my fandom. In a weird way, it's a "win-win" situation for Toronto fans right now...well, provided the Leafs make the playoffs and don't finish one point out again.
Oh, and DN, sorry 'bout the typo--had no idea that was the proper spelling. :)