Today Thu Fri
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 23, 2012
Chance of Rain
18°/15°
It is forcast to be Fog at 11:00 PM EDT on May 24, 2012
Fog
19°/14°
It is forcast to be Chance of Rain at 11:00 PM EDT on May 25, 2012
Chance of Rain
22°/13°

9 Comments

news

Villain: The ROM Crystal (Interior)

Torontoist is ending the year by naming our Heroes and Villains of 2007––the people, places, and things that we’ve either fallen head over heels in love with or developed uncontrollable rage towards over the past twelve months. Get your dose, starting Boxing Day and running into the new year, three times a day––sunrise, noon, and sunset.
villain_romcrystal.jpg
From price hikes to bomb hoaxes, the ROM has been a constant news item this year. But while Thorarinn Jonsson’s silliness left us unburdened with tangible consequences, the same cannot be said for Daniel Libeskind’s Michael Lee-Chin Crystal, which is a mess our museum will be cleaning up for years. The exterior has divided the critics. Some praise its bold fusion of a modern structure with the existing edifice. Others compare it to a giant metal spider from space. But in focusing on whether the exterior of the building is a masterpiece or a disasterpiece, very little time has been spent discussing the interior. From the looks of things, very little money or planning went into that part of the Crystal. A confusing, artless layout and an abundance of cheap building materials make the Crystal’s insides slightly less appealing than an IKEA. The second you step inside the new entrance, you’re immediately shoved into a dimly lit coat check with a claustrophobically low ceiling. Things slightly improve after you enter the main atrium, although the juxtaposition of the new building’s starkness with the richly decorated older wings creates a comparison from which the Crystal does not profit.
For years, the ROM has complained about insufficient space, claiming the collection on display was the tip of an iceberg whose main body lay hidden in storage. Yet this new addition to the building adds little in terms of gallery space. Half of it has been used to house the new gift shop and restaurant, not to mention dubiously educational features such as the “Spirit House” or the “J.P. Driscoll Family Stair of Wonders,” which is a real missed opportunity. What could have been a jam-packed treasure trove of eclectic curiosities in the spirit of Oxford’s Pitt Rivers Museum is instead just a big, white stairwell with a few toy soldiers and seashells shoved in the walls. While the Crystal’s interior windows and skylights are sometimes visually interesting, many of them provide unimpressive views and are already coated in an inch of dust. Does no one at the ROM have a Swiffer? The choice of white as the colour for everything means dirt, scuff marks and cracks in the walls are embarrassingly obvious. There is no reason “modern architecture” has to be synonymous with “crappily made.” Just look at the Four Seasons Centre for the Performing Arts with its gorgeous auditorium and lobby. Hopefully some of the kinks will be ironed out next year when the new galleries will all be fully up and running. Even so, too much of the inside of the Crystal renovation looks in need of, well, a renovation.
Photo by Marc Lostracco.

Comments

  • Chester Pape

    What a load. While there are a few issues with the interior design, main among them being Liebskind’s lame “chairs” it’s hardly a villain.
    It’s a demonstrably false statement, a deliberate lie if you wish, to claim that the addition adds little in terms of gallery space, there is a lot more square footage of open floor space given over to display than there was in the terrace galleries, especially when you take into account the 17,000 sq ft exhibit hall in the basement which is Canada’s largest space for rotating/temporary exhibits.
    Time will tell if the finished product will suffer the shabbiness one sees in the work in progress, certainly the completed spaces of the ICC and the Garfield Weston Hall looked better than the incomplete spaces when last I saw it.

  • Rob Shostak

    I’d be the first to knock the ROM down (well second after Thorarinn) but I think its moments like the one pictured that can get you to overlook some of its faults.
    But in terms of “cheap” building materials… You can’t pay $270 million and expect a $500 million building…
    I think if anything ROM related is going to be called a villain, it should be the Grand Opening concert thing organizers. That was just the lamest who-cares of people ever assembled… Individually they’re ok but together…. auuuugh… and TV’s Paul Gross talking to a deity projected as hands on the ROM…. come on….

  • Johnnie Walker

    @Chester: “A few issues”? THAT, my friend, is a deliberate lie. I’m sorry, but this is really an Emperor Has No Clothes moment. The inside of that building is an ugly mess and I, for one, think the point of a renovation to something like a museum should be the actual improvement of its interior space, not just a showy architectural-style-du-jour facade. And while, obviously, there is additional gallery space, including that charming room in the basement with the sculpture of Margaret Atwood, its inarguable that a huge amount of the renovation is taken up by non-gallery space.

  • rek

    I’m waiting for all of the exhibits to open (February?) before going in for the first time.

  • Chester Pape

    Last I saw they were saying April before everything is done.

  • Jameso

    Thing is, while there’s lots of new floor space, how much is useable? I’ve been through galleries on the upper floors where at least 1/5 of the room has less than 6′ clearance- what use is any of that? As for the walls on which nothing can be hung, or the traffic flow that will have groups trying to enter and exit through the same end of some room, it’s fairly clear that use as a museum was not the primary concern in the design process on this building.

  • beth maher

    Ummmm… Do you guys even remember what this place was like before? Let me remind you:
    Awful.
    Confusing.
    Dark.
    Depressing.
    Things shoved in dark corners.
    Kinda smelly.
    Most of the beautiful parts you are talking about them “wrecking” were, in fact, not accessible at all. They were used as offices and warehouses and were not open to the public – oh and the parts that were accessible were usually boarded up and covered to the point of being unrecognizable.
    And this doesn’t even begin to to address how darned confusing and maze-like the old building was ESPECIALLY the Terrace bits -which, by the way, were the only things torn down to build the crystal. Oh, and the Terrace was falling apart, poorly designed, and built in the late seventies, by the way, so it wasn’t exactly a heritage building. It was, in fact, by agreement of pretty much everyone involved, a colossal mistake.
    Irregardless of how ugly you may think the Crystal is (and you are definitely entitled), the re-opening of the wings of the museum is a triumph. They are beautiful and spacious, you can once again see the architecture of the building (which you haven’t been able to since at least the late seventies). And the exhibits are pretty good too. Maybe you should indeed wait until they reopen all of the exhibits (which, by the way, won’t be till sometime in 2009 – exhibits aren’t just things you slap together with some poster board and some scotch tape – there’s serious research and planning involved) to make these judgments.
    I mean, it seems pretty silly to be so upset at something that isn’t even finished.

  • Johnnie Walker

    @James: Word. That’s exactly the kind of shoddy planning I was talking about.
    @Beth: I feel like we are talking at crossed purposes. I never accused the ROM reno of “wrecking” any part of the old building; I’d be the first to say “good riddance” to the crappy and boring Terrace 70s reno. Also, I never called the Crystal itself ugly (in fact, I think it’s much more visually appealing than the old Terrace) but rather the space inside it, which currently reminds me of your remark about “poster board and scotch tape”. To be frank, your description of the ROM pre-Crystal bears little resemblance to my memory of it. Are you talking about the ROM when it was in the process of being renovated? It’s true that many parts of the museum have been inaccessible since they began building the Crystal, but before that, they were fully open.
    And, not to be a douche, but “irregardless”? Really?

  • Dinoprince

    I have to say that the new ROM dinosaur and prehistoric Life exhibit, while interesting downright sucks compared to the old one. There was nothing as cool as seeing the evolution of the horse in stages, the melancholy waves of the ancient sea seemingly brush over the bones of the old marine reptiles. The creatures struggling in the tar pits. The eternal battle between stegosaurus and two hungry allosaurs. The mighty Mammoth, with it’s glorious backdrop, or seeing the duckbills reach for the sky. Many of my favorite childhood memories revolved around that wing. The creepy jungles of the creatceous, The Albertosaurus ready to strike as you enter. It was all very magical. I would lean over the side of the jurrasic exhibit and get lost in that world. Or peek into the diorama of the two meat eaters attacking a poor bronto and gaze into the far horizon, a lost empty plain. None of what I saw today invoked any wonder in my heart. It’s a tragedy to see what has become of the ROM. They even took parts of the bat cave and the entire mammal gallery seems to be missing. Museums are somber trips back in time, not gate ways to the land of the artsy fartsy. The ROM was one of a kind, now it’s just another collection of bones piled together like so many tetris blocks.