November 8, 2007
Right-Wingers Using Traditionally Left-Wing Tactics To Make Their Point. Cute.

TTC EMPLOYEES WANTEDTTC service, union wages, and graffiti. If this post gets fewer than thirty comments, we'll be very sad.PAY: 26.58/hr
JOB REQUIREMENTS:
• Able to be rude and unhelpful
• Must be constantly late
• Willing to waste tax payer money
Thanks to Corinne Alstrom for the tip! And thanks to the people who helped decipher the hard-to-read middle bullet point.
Photo taken by Jonathan Goldsbie, at the southwest street-level entrance to Queen's Park station.



"Constantly" late.
Why do you have to be right-wing to believe TTC employees are paid too much?
Yes, I also fail to see how this is right-wing in any way. It seems I have a lot to disagree about with you, Mr. Goldsbie.
I think the graffiti is simplistic but on-the-nose more than anything. The ATWU needs constant reminders what a bunch of thugs they are and while this doesn't accomplish much, it's still funnily true.
Weird, I thought right-wingers were only into money and young boys.
I think you need to broaden your understanding of what right wing and left wing means.
"Wasting tax payer money" is more often a lament of conservatives that of tax-and-spend liberals, I suppose.
But I would say that the war on drugs and the war in the middle east is a waste of taxpayer money, too.
Ok, I'll chime in with a rude and unhelpful story.
Yesterday my morning queen streetcar stopped at university, and a girl with luggage in tow tried to get off after everyone else had, but the driver had already disabled the doors even though the light wasn't anywhere near changing. She yelled up for him to open the door, and he replied on the speakers by yelling "why don't you wake up next time!!"
On another note, I'm with Sammy.. What's left-wing right-wing got to do with anything?
1. asshole taggers
2. wtf is wrong with you? This has nothing to do with right wing or left wing anything.
3. Every time I get on a streetcar I make eye contact with the driver and say "How you doing".
25% are delightfully nice and give me some fun sass or smart ass comment.
25% are polite and friendly and just give a courteous greeting back to me.
50% don't even acknowledge I've said something to them.
Taggers don't do stencils, dave, they tag.
I can't think of any examples of TTC drivers or other employees being dicks in my presence, I agree they shouldn't be paid $25+/hr to sit in a booth handing out tickets and passes. McDonald's slaves make a third of that (or less) and do a hell of a lot more work with no job security.
Oh man! I hate to say it but calling this right wing is kind of crazy!
It is important to note that for bus drivers in particular, GO Transit and the other regional transit authorities are desperate for drivers so in terms of wage pressure it's probably counterproductive to look to reduce theirs at a time when TTC is trying to expand. Clerical workers on the other hand might be worth taking a hard look at.
TTC unionised employees don't pay the Ontario Health Tax - the union won an arbitration so TTC pays it for them ($6m p.a.) When you factor in stuff like this and benefits, $26.50 is only the start.
Now, when you get pumpkins thrown through your bus window, it mightn't seem to be quite so much, and there was that ticket collector guy whose booth was set on fire at Lawrence West. However, I doubt this Toronto council would endorse the concept of "danger pay" for TTC workers in certain neighbourhoods.
I approve of the constantly late factor. The guy in the booth at my station is away half the time. With no one around to make change or sell tickets... well, what's a commuter gonna do, IYKWIM.
tyrannosaurus_rek, don't they both deserve a living wage? I would not call TTC employees wealthy by any standard. I especially wouldn't if a given employee was raising a family.
Making comparisons to McDonalds is a joke. That is no baseline for comparison as a decent job.
I have an idea - why don't you turn an item about graffiti into an endless comment thread about politics by throwing an offhand and ill-considered quasi-political quip into the post? That will get you your 30 posts for sure.
"I think you need to broaden your understanding of what right wing and left wing means. "
- I was half-joking Beth. I understand all too well what the right-wing is about...and it's not what they would have us to believe.
The reason, to me, they made this a right/left wing thing (perhaps jokingly) is that the sign says what most right wingers say about people who work with/for the public.
Do people think these drivers are overpaid?
What would you do that job for? I don't recall ever having a pumpkin thrown through a window at me, or my cubicle being set on fire.
Oh, so sorry, tyrannetcetcetc. My bad. "asshole stencillers". There. That's better. At least you had no problem with me calling the perpetrators assholes.
I'm fine with 25$+ an hour plus whatever other benefits they get to do the jobs they do. Comparing a unionized job at the TTC to a McDonald's job is kind of dumb. Not sure what planet you're on.
I think it's obvious here that Jonathan Goldsbie is taking a bold stand against the hooliganism frequently practiced by the left. The right wing should hold itself to a higher standard, rather than adopting the practice of vandalizing public and private property.
I wasn't, actually reffering to you WannaBinToranna. Just the post.
I if I were to refer to someone, it would be David Newland. I agree, Mr. Newland.
Goldsbie, I think you need a vacation. Your last three posts have been confusing and/or included erroneous statements. Does anyone edit this guy?
Oh, sorry Beth. Hey, I like your' website by the way. Congrats on the new place.
Also, keep in mind, I live in AmeriKa (although I visit TO often and I have never had a bad experience with the TTC).
So, I probably have a heightened hatred of the right-wing given we have Dumbass in the White House.
Anyway, continue on with the debate, we're over halfway there to 30 comments: - )
If TO'ist had only thrown a bicycle in the story, you'd definitely hit 30 comments:- )
"Goldsbie, I think you need a vacation. Your last three posts have been confusing and/or included erroneous statements. Does anyone edit this guy?"
No. That's kinda the point of Torontoist. Editors merely encourage posting frequently, and adhering to the style guide.
Individual voices are not edited for content except in extreme cases (libel, etc).
Anyone could get a pumpkin tossed through their window or their workplace vandalized, but these are not justifications for their pay cheque.
My point about McDonald's workers is that the TTC doesn't need to be paying union wages and benefits for someone to sit on their ass handing out bits of paper and occasionally answering questions. Driving a bus or train, sure, fine, that's a lot of responsibility and takes special training, but counting out two rows of tickets or making change for that 6th $20 bill on a metro pass purchase? I'm sure there are plenty of other places to trim the payroll budget too.
The lateness is right at least... The northbound 6 Bay bus often seems to run on a 96 Wilson schedule!
I used to have a soft spot for the TTC, but since coming back from Seoul (and previously experiencing Osaka/Kansai's subway and train network) I can't help but see just how bad it is.
I'm with ya' on most things rek, but I gotta say, I partially agree with what you're saying but...
I try not to say who is or isn't overpaid unless I've done their job for a week. Are there people who probably make too much for doing little? Sure. Are there people who make too little and work their asses off...definitely. When someone comes home from an office and says, "I worked hard today", well, maybe you did, but somewhere, someone also went half a mile into a coal mine in the ground for half of what you made today. Someone picked up your' trash for less than you made today.
I know there is some corruption, but for the most part, I'm pro-unions...I think more vocations need them and I just cringe whenever someone says that "trimming" needs to be done on the payroll at the worker level. I'm sure there is much more waste at the top. And it seems to be the people in the trenches who always end up getting the abuse.
I'd rather my taxes go to a working person who is making their way or their families way as opposed to redecorating a CIO's office or a golf trip.
You take it out on the drivers, booth operators because you see them everyday...they're on the frontline but they are one face of the TTC...put yourself in their place.
McDonald's is a private corp. and a whole other (notice I didn't say whole `nother:- ) story. I will say though, I had a friend who owned a restaurant (not McD's) and I helped him out sometimes, and yes, restaurant workers work way too hard for too little. but then, look at what a teacher makes compared to someone who can catch/throw a ball or read a teleprompter on TV.
I guess my main point is...Say you lost your' job right now, whatever you do. Now, say you go 4, 5, 6 maybe 9 months without a job...bills are piling up. Now, someone says you could get a job at the TTC. OK, maybe yes, maybe no, but it would bring in some money. And if you don't think you could somehow (under any circumstances)find yourself in that position, you're kidding yourslef. Yes, Sunshine, maybe some day you will HAVE to take a job you don't like.
These people are not so different than You or I. Could or would they be doing something different if they could? Maybe. And maybe some just love what they do...the point is, these are OUR people, they are us, these are not the enemy. They are not wasting YOUR' tax money, they are just doing a job and they want the same thing you want. Instead of throwing pumpkins at them, setting their booths on fires, right down to calling them mean and lazy, we should be standing up for them because they are us, they are the people who work to live, just like you and I. They are not tearing down your' mom and pop stores, they are not putting up condos, they are not putting people out on the street or sending your' jobs overseas.
@beth: I can see the case for the collective spirit of Torontoist as a blog but when said voice is writing tripe and making strange unsubstantiated claims, it doesn't reflect well on the publication and crosses into the realm of unprofessionalism.
WannaBinToranna:
"When someone comes home from an office and says, "I worked hard today", well, maybe you did, but somewhere, someone also went half a mile into a coal mine in the ground for half of what you made today. Someone picked up your' trash for less than you made today."
But what value did the miner or trash-collector add to society? Anyone could, if forced to, go into a mine and dig up some rock, or pick up trash. That's why wages are lower. Not everyone could manage an accounting department, set large-scale strategy for a major enterprise, etc. And despite your tired anti-corporate rhetoric, this actually does take hard work. What would happen if all the managers in society went on strike?
"I'd rather my taxes go to a working person who is making their way or their families way as opposed to redecorating a CIO's office or a golf trip."
*Yawn* Workers of the world unite, etc etc. Most of the profits that come from major enterprises actually go to pay for the pensions of people like you.
"They are not wasting YOUR' tax money, they are just doing a job and they want the same thing you want. "
Actually, yes, they are being paid by my tax money. They are doing a job for which someone else would do for less.
I think the title of this post is very misleading. I consider myself a bit of a leftie and totally agree with the sentiment of the sign.
Most of the TTC employees aren't explicitly rude but their attitude to the job and the way the TTC seems to be run in general seems totally lacking when compared to other transit systems. And I have never worked in McDonalds but did work for two years as a busgirl and waitress in a "nice" coffee shop during which time a brick was thrown at and broke a large window, I was verbally harassed by a man who appeared to masturbating while calling me a c**t, and I unlocked the bathroom to find a man slumped against the door with a needle in his arm. I wasn't earning $26 per hour and I wasn't mean or lazy towards the customers. Maybe there is an argument that TTC employees deserve their wages but I'm not setting their booths on fire or being abusive yet I'm still expected to tolerate rude service, having family visitors sworn at because a TTC employee couldn't make out what they were saying and being cat-called by a TTC staff member in uniform on a subway platform. That just doesn't sit right with me, especially as I have never experienced customer service like it anywhere else but on the TTC.
Is that 30?
I think this is 30
Wait, ked - the TTC workers aren't getting a "fair wage!" If they were only being paid $100K per year, they *might* just consider being more friendly.
tdotg2 -
You are what's wrong with America/Canada today.
"But what value did the miner or trash-collector add to society"
-Fine, you do it then.
"And despite your tired anti-corporate rhetoric, this actually does take hard work. What would happen if all the managers in society went on strike?"
- If only. You know what's tired? Guys like you and your' race to the bottom line and putting profits over people.
You probably hate your' tax money being spent on a single-mom, but get excited when it goes towards bombing another country.
as far as yawning over "Workers of the World Unite"...carelful, tdotg...there's more of us than there are of you:- )
WBT:
"-Fine, you do it then. "
I would, but I have skills that allow me to make more money doing other things.
And as I mentioned, it's not about putting profits over people. Profits ARE people. Profits are bonuses for employees (at all levels), profits are what pays for the retired teacher's food and rent (Ontario Teachers Pension is one of the largest owners of companies in Ontario). There's nothing wrong with making a profit.
And I think we need to help single moms live lives of dignity. We have welfare as one part of that; efforts to get them back into the workforce are a second part of that.
Handing out tickets isn't comparable to planning fiscal strategy or managing the workload of 18 department members or even doing the accounting for a small home-based business. Unless they have access to some hidden bank of switches and buttons and dials that need to be monitored constantly, ticket booth operators just do. not. work. hard. enough. to. deserve. $25+/hour. Period.
It's unskilled retail work that barely requires contact with the public. It's hardly blue collar work. As I said, fast food slaves work harder (and get just as much scorn) for much less money.
Drivers, maintenance staff, I'm fine with them.
I would, but I have skills that allow me to make more money doing other things.
Well, there you go...and good for you. Some, through no fault of their own (sometimes) don't have or cannot obtain those skills. We can't all be captains, and the world needs rowers too. And, I am not wishing ill will on you, but what if you had some type of accident or incident where you could no longer perform those skills? I am not saying this is always the reason, and there are those who abuse the system (at ALL levels).
You said profits are people, but that is hardly reflected in this economy of sending jobs overseas. Small towns and even some cities are drying up because of this.
No, there is nothing wrong with making a profit...but good grief, do CEO's have to make 3,000 times as much as their employees? There's profit and then there's just plain ridiculous.
But, I'm with ya' on some of what you say.
I'm just careful of who I accuse of being over/underpaid is all, or who is lazy and who isn't, or someone's "value" to society. Whomever sprayed this sign could be accused of defacing public property and wasting tax dollars for cleanup. (is it whomever or whoever?)
I think it's sad that anyone could see smug graffiti as a traditional left-wing tactic. From the general strike to Banksy. Ugh.
The headline was certainly meant to be provocative, but it also happens to be what struck me most about the graffiti on both visits I paid to it. Like my OCAP/CCTV post from earlier today, I wanted to explore a disconnect between medium and message -- not necessarily a bad thing, mind you. I was genuinely curious how commenters on Torontoist would respond; how would people feel if they agree with the sentiment but not the way it was expressed, or vice versa?
As to why I used "left" and "right" distinctions to refer to the medium and message, respectively:
"Right": The particular way the message was phrased (specifically, "willing to waste tax payer money") is entirely consistent with right-wing rhetoric. Not that the left wants to waste taxpayer money, of course, but the debate over salaries of TTC employees (and all public employees for that matter) falls very clearly along left-right lines, within City Hall, anyway. While most of the sentiments expressed via this piece of graffiti aren't indicative of a conservative ideology, I would say that the last one likely is.
"Left": Not counting messages scrawled on the inside of toilet stalls, it's fairly uncommon to see graffiti expressing a conservative view, and I can't ever recall seeing such a stencil before. Further, it's even rarer to see sharp conservative satire; satire is a powerful way to make a critical point, and there's no reason that it should be dominated by the left.
WBT, if we can find some common ground, I feel good about society ;)
All I would say is that while certain segments of the population have been challenged over the last few years, people have rarely "had it better," as a general statement. Our unemployment and consumer spending numbers reflect that.
The fact that the CEO makes "3,000 times more" than your average employee (which I think is an exxageration - if someone made 50K, that means the CEO would make $150MM, and I'm pretty sure that's not happening) is not relevant to a middle-class family. Income inequality may have gone up but it doesn't mean that the middle-class is earning less - just not having their salaries increase at the same rate as the "CEOs".
But then, the CEO can add billions to a company's value in only a few years. This, again, pays for the food and rent of retired teachers, TTC workers, etc.
tyrannosaurus_rek: "ticket booth operators just do. not. work. hard. enough. to. deserve. $25+/hour. Period."
Uh, you need to do a teeny tiny bit of research about what the guys in the booth are responsible for before you label them as guys just "handing out tickets".
You seem a bit clueless about how people earn a living and what the going rates are for various occupations. But maybe you're 23 or a student or something.
davedave - Enlighten us then; what critical functions are booth operators responsible for while manning the booths?
I'm not validating your stupid ad hominem, but I'm neither 23 nor a student. I have a 43 hour/week salaried job at an ad agency in the film district, but I also spent 3 years in the kitchen of a large fast food restaurant, built and cleaned and repaired swimming pools, and worked an assembly line in a car parts factory. Am I allowed to have an opinion now?
i like jonathan's headline.
while the artist may not be a member of the Conservative Party of Canada, nor even self-identify as a "right winger", the statements made in the stencil reflect an anti-union, anti-tax attitude.
Are their instances of TTC employees being jerks? OF course. But find me a profession that is free of jerks. The truth is, most TTC employees aren't rude at all. i find ttc workers to be very friendly. and considering how underfunded the TTC is I think they are doing a great job of keeping the system running on time.
So, in my view, the artist is not being motivated by real conditions on the TTC, but rather by a political viewpoint that believes unionised public sector workers get paid too much to do too little. It's a classic right wing argument used to cultivate distrust in our public services.
Let me put it this way: The artist of that stencil did not vote NDP in the last election. Nor did he/she vote for David Miller. I'd bet on that. So what's wrong Jonathan's headline?
You wanna make TTC workers less grumpy? Let's start funding transit properly so their workplace isn't so dysfunctional. The irony here of course, is that it's the right-wingers who cut all the funding for transit. So it's a little hard to feel sorry for their complaints now. boohoo.
Am I being simplistic? Or is the situation just plain simple? Conservative politicians (using false majorities) cut public services, and when those services begin to suffer, the workers are blamed.
I'm a little (okay, a lot) late here, but just to address one specific point: re: #21 ("Editors merely encourage posting frequently, and adhering to the style guide...Individual voices are not edited for content except in extreme cases (libel, etc)."): that's not wholly true, Beth, at least not in response to the comment you're responding to. While we're all about everyone having a lot of freedom to post what they want to post on Torontoist, we have a copy editor on staff, and Marc and me obviously keep an eye on content. If there are problems with something, we'll do something about it.
And, that said, there's nothing wrong with this post. Just because some people here are disagreeing with a label (right-wing) doesn't mean that that label is wrong. Jonathan explained the reason for that label pretty lucidly.
Jon's [lucid] explanations for politicizing this issue seemed too weak to warrant such labels to the message.
If I understand correctly, a single point (willing to waste tax payer money) is a political indicator strong enough to state that graffiti was the work of 'right wingers'
Is it possible that city hall is not a perfect microcosm of this city? Could Torontonians, regardless of political identitfication, share a feeling of disgust at the level of service provided at such a high cost? By the general tone of your critics here, I'd say you made an irresponsible conclusion.
Re: JG's "While most of the sentiments expressed via this piece of graffiti aren't indicative of a conservative ideology, I would say that the last one likely is."
Assuming this is true, that the left doesn't complain as much about wasted tax dollars, why is that? Should they not care as much about using a limited resource on something that is wasteful and therefore takes away from something that may be more worthy? Is this the moral or cultural relativism of the left shrinking from actually decrying waste as they feel they are in no position to actually call it waste? Someone needs to, just not them? Or is it fear that their pet causes could also be seen to be wasteful.
We should hear as much complaining from the left as from the right. Waste is waste. Why should this be "right wing"?
Further to 43's general point, one would think that supporters of taxation to fund public works would be the most ardent critics of wasteful allocation of tax dollars, since waste of tax dollars (a) undermines the case for taxation generally and (b) reduces the amount of tax dollars available for (presumably) more beneficial expenditures.
A good demonstration of the intellectual gymnastics necessary to turn this into a left-right thing is given by 41, who I understand to be the muse of the specious "public space" "movement" generally, in making the argument that TTC workers would be less lazy, surly, etc. (though 41 doesn't see them as either, and therefore neither should you) if their institution were better funded through tax dollars (and thus 41's argument, if logically extended, makes the somewhat counterintuitive claim that the attitudes of TTC workers could be improved by a wage cut if the proceeds of the wage cut was reinvested in the TTC generally), all the time ignoring (a) that the money spent on the not-at-all lazy and surly workers could otherwise go to improving such working conditions, increase service, reduce pollution, and generally achieve the Left's political goals
and (b) the willingness of the public to support an improvement of the TTC generally through tax revenues is reduced by the fact that, historically, such funding increases are captured by union wage demands which crowds-out the very improvements everyone agrees is necessary.
The irony is, of course, that the Left's goals will never be achieved because they support the waste that undermines the case for support of public infrastructure through taxation and, I might add, attack the private sectors' reasonable contributions which have the effect of creating tax room to fund other worthy public investments on the most specious of grounds. Boo hoo indeed.
I agree with mez
I have many friends who work for the TTC and I would hope I never have to drive bus for any reason. Split shifts just suck and the morons you have to put up with are unbelievable. So if you think they are over paid your not the brightest bulb. Why do people dislike it when others are paid a living wage? Just pathetic really. Them being late is what their fault? And in any company you have bad workers it should not reflect on all the others.
43, 44, and 45 hit the nail on the head! Ding!
"Just because some people here are disagreeing with a label (right-wing) doesn't mean that that label is wrong. Jonathan explained the reason for that label pretty lucidly."
I really, really can't agree with that, David.