Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Clear at 10:00 PM EST on February 09, 2012
Clear
3°/-11°
It is forcast to be Mostly Cloudy at 10:00 PM EST on February 10, 2012
Mostly Cloudy
-8°/-14°
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 10:00 PM EST on February 11, 2012
Partly Cloudy
-4°/-8°

8 Comments

news

The Great Torontoist Challenge: Pumpkin Tart Edition

dviousto_pumpkinbanner.jpg
Photo by dviousto from the Torontoist Flickr Pool.
Ah, autumn. While the weather hasn’t quite hit the pinnacle of crisp suniness, the leaves are turning colour and walking the dog through Trinity-Bellwoods has gotten decidedly crunchier. Another key aspect of the fall season is the food—Thanksgiving dinner and all the sleepy joy it brings. So while the long weekend may be over, the remnants are probably still biding their time in your fridge. We know you have leftover turkey—or torfuky for that matter—hiding somewhere, and nothing tastes better after a shot of tryptophan than a nice pumpkin treat. Torontoist couldn’t consume five entire pies without the risk of becoming gourd-phobic, so we settled on individual tarts from local Toronto bakeries. Vive la citrouille!

The Contestants

It must be noted that the entrants for this particular challenge were not only chosen for their tart-centric reputations. Due to time constraints (read “working for The Man”), Torontoist was unable to set about procuring tarts until later in the day. At this stage many fine possible contenders were ruled out due to lack of tart-supply or because they deemed being open past 5:00 p.m. too strenuous. As such, some alternative purveyors of tart were sought out and foodstuffs were obtained. That having been said, we are more than pleased with our selections, though not all the challengers are as we originally intended.
allcontestants_julie.JPG
Photo by Julie Reitsma.

The Criteria

Additional Criteria

As per usual, we have ranked our tarts in terms of cost. Make what you will of it—we don’t think it always adds up.
Bread & Roses ($2.10); Sunglow ($2.10); Future ($2.50); Queen of Tarts ($4.50); Cheese Boutique ($4.99).

Results

tiles1.jpg
Clockwise from top left: Bread & Roses tart photo by Julie Reitsma; Cheese Boutique exterior photo by Jen Chan; Sunglow tart photo by Julie Reitsma; Bloor West Village sign photo by jbcurio; Cheese Boutique tart photo by Julie Reitsma.

Conclusions

The results of this challenge threw Torontoist for a bit of a spin, as they don’t necessarily agree with our pre-conceived expectations. We made a bit of a squishy face and took our calculators out, but the numbers don’t lie. Here’s how it all went down.
The real bottom of the heap, having won in none of the categories, was Sunglow. This tart had a nice smell, was easy to divy up for our judges and was a good price. Unfortunately, the pluses peter out there. Sunglow’s pumpkin tart comes wrapped in not-so earth-friendly plastic and is then encased in an awkward foil tray that needs to be peeled off. Once exposed the judges were shocked to note the distinctly “jamaican patty” yellowness of the tart’s crust. The taste was described as medicinal, artificial, potpourri and even insecticide-like. Add a consistency of baby food, and Torontoist would not buy this tart again, nor accept it as a gift.
There was a tie for the second-to-last ranked entrants, one of which caused us much befuddlement—Bread & Roses. Though having won out in two of five categories, when Bread & Roses didn’t win, it really didn’t win. The most important thing to note is that this tart was wet. Sweaty. Shiny. We’re talking pooling here. Along with this, the tart had a mass-produced feel to it, despite the tastiness. The tin foil wrapper and distinctly Stokely-Van Camp filling contrived to exude, as one judge said, a “I forgot to get the pie” panic attack grocery store pick-up vibe.
Next up on our list, tied with Bread & Roses, is The Cheese Boutique. This was our most expensive entrant which to be honest was no big shocker. What was a shocker, however, were the results. Torontoist loves to spend an hour wandering through the Boutique—it has, without question, some of the most beautiful food available in this city, and the desserts, protected in their glass cases, appear to be no different. The pumpkin tart, however, disappointed in a few key areas. On the positive end, this tart held together well, had a nice crust, some decorative chocolate piping and a lovely cream topping. That being said, as one of our judges put it, “this is all cream—no dream.” This tart was very busy appearance-wise. What with the chocolate and the cream you couldn’t really see what was happening with the pumpkin. This carried over into flavour—we had a difficult time differentiating the flavour of the crust, the pumpkin and the chocolate and the texture was notably waxy. While the tart was made of clearly quality ingredients, the above listed issues in additon to cost and size (it was by far the smallest on offer) make it impossible for it to be a winner.
tiles2.jpg
Clockwise from left: Queen of Tarts exterior photo by photopia / HiMY SYeD; Queen of Tarts tart photo by Julie Reitsma; St. Lawrence Market photo by Ian Muttoo; Photo of Future tart by Julie Reitsma.
Our runner-up, losing out by less than one percent, was The Queen of Tarts. From the get-go, this tart was a fan favourite. In fact, one panel member’s offspring immediately pointed it out and requested some, even though it was decidedly chocolate-free. This tart looked really nice—the crust, which ended up being fantabulous, was very appealing visually. This contestant was also not bright orange, had a deep-dishness to it, and was decorated with two simple, yet pretty, cookie bells, which though not necessarily relevant to autumn or pumpkins, was a nice touch. What was missing, unfortunately, was enough flavour. It lacked sugar and spice, and therefore the filling, though obviously real pumpkin, was somehow vacuous. Unlike a Sunglow tart, however, Torontoist would gladly accept this tart as a gift and may, next time we venture onto Ronces, go and grab one ourselves.
The champion du jour was Future. As stated previously, our judging panel felt that this tart had the most “French bakery-ness” to it. The presentation and flavours were dandy, with real whipping cream and the right ratios of spice and pumpkin. While some of the panel felt that there was a certain unnameable quality missing, and others mentioned that perhaps there was too much crust or that the spice “blob” on the cream was slightly disconcerting, on a whole this is a great tart. It tasted and looked home-made and, unlike some entries, there was bona fide quality across the board. As they say in France, “cette tartelette à la citrouille est belle et exemplifie l’esprit de la saison.” And so, mes amis, tartons-nous!

Filed under: , , ,

Report an error Send a tip

Comments

  • Chris Taylor

    This is a head-scratcher. The winner in pumpkin-ness and overall taste fails to take home the big prize, because it was wet and had a “mass-produced feel”. Where is “mass-produced feel” and “French bakery-ness” in the judging criteria? If “homemade-ness” is a criteria, and it appears to be here — include it!
    Otherwise it looks kinda silly for the winner in two categories to come in as an also-ran.

  • Gloria

    Maybe the Future tart was good or decent in all categories, but not quite stellar in all of them. Some of the remaining tarts might have one or two outstanding qualities, but severely lack others.
    Compare it to, say, the first past the post system. A party might win out in sheer number of votes overall, but still not win as many seats as expected due to the way they are determined by riding. Eh? Does that work? It’s topical!

  • Julie Reitsma

    Hi Chris.
    It is definitely a head scratcher, and I did go over the numbers several times. These issues come up when you have judging panels with very different ideas of what good is.
    The thing with Bread and Roses is that it did VERY poorly in “Appearance”— the “wet”, “shiny” issue. It seriously looked disgusting. It also lost on “Ingredient Quality”—because it felt like it was mass-produced. By that we mean that the pastry didn’t strike us as being made in store and the pumpkin filling could very well have come out of a can. It did taste good. Sometimes things that aren’t super high quality do (every now and then I want Chicken McNuggets)!
    By “French Bakery” we mean that it looks like it has that certain quality, that attention to detail, fine ingredients, beautiful presentation…
    Hope that makes things a bit less silly :)

  • Chris Taylor

    Not to mention there are probably a hundred bakeries in the city who were not even sampled. Their contributions were marginalised by the oppressive, outdated five-tart system. Clearly the solution is to have a dual-ballot system where you can vote for the pie category on one hand, and the bakery on the other.

  • Chris Taylor

    I understand, especially the ah, “build quality” of the B&R tarts (I’ve had them before).
    The “French bakery-ness” is a bit funny as the catch-all descriptor for ingredient quality, since pumpkin pie is a dish that originated in North America. =)

  • Gloria

    My post sounds half-baked next to yours, Chris.

  • Marc Lostracco

    Personally, I like the crappy, slimy mass-produced products over the handmade bakery stuff, but that’s ’cause I’m classy like that.

  • Chris Taylor

    My girlfriend bought the lame-o Sunglow tarts (before reading this review, obviously). =) Had one last night — it was okay, but not the best tart in the world. Definitely something a little off although I didn’t detect the medicinial notes you guys tasted. The pastry wasn’t too off-putting. I was expecting bright yellow Jamaican-patty (per your review) but it was pretty average and nothing to write home about.
    Will probably settle for B&R if we get another batch since it’s closest. Love the Cheese Boutique’s dairy products but the idea of pumpkin pie larded with chocolate is just a bit strange.