Photo by Danmcp from the Miniatures Photoset.
Discussion about the evolving intersection of web 2.0 and the music industry tends to gravitate towards the repetition of cliched mantras which (re)announce the death of the major label and champion the democracy of social networking. While these market trends appear to be in full swing, the manner in which they play out in specific musical economies and subcultures varies greatly. Since electronic music is so tied to technology, it makes sense that independent labels and artists in this field would serve as a good barometer for the market shifts that are transforming the entire industry from the (under)ground up. Torontoist has sought out the perspective of two artists working within the local electronic music scene to chat about their experience with social media and new-school digital distribution.
DJ and producer Noah Pred cannot be accused of being lazy; in addition to several recording projects, a job at Moog Audio and teaching aspiring producers the ubiquitous Ableton Live software platform, he also runs the label Sentient Sound. Noah's imprint features an international roster that includes several seasoned Toronto techno producers such as NAW, Myers Briggs and Adam Marshall.
What distinguishes Sentient Sound from a number of other Toronto based independent electronic music labels is the fact that it is exclusively digital. The label was launched in 2005 and Noah is quick to point out the decision to 'go digital' was relatively straightforward as “the uphill battle of pressing vinyl...with its daunting manufacturing costs, no longer seemed worth it, while the digital download market was just beginning to flourish.” DRM-free niche retail outfits like Bleep and Beatport have reshaped the marketplace for the once vinyl-obsessed DJ community. Beatport has further blurred the distinction between online artist presence and the retail experience through a proprietary media player which can be plugged right into any web page and profiles on many social networks. Noah categorizes these changes as both democratic and inclusive as the market is now "unrestricted by manufacturing runs and accessible to everyone with a computer, playable by anyone with an iPod or CD-burner. The size of the market for electronic music has expanded exponentially."
Vergel Evans is another example of a local artist who has thrown himself headlong into digital distribution. Evans writes and releases music and also hosts the popular techno-culture podcast Lx.7. The podcast invites the audience into Vergel's studio to "de-mystify the process" of producing house and techno and also documents key North American festivals like Mutek and DEMF. Vergel is extremely enthusiastic about the potential for artists to "find their audience" through social media: "Last.fm is especially amazing since it allows the community to rank and associate music they find relevant. I've uploaded two albums worth of material and have found that my music ranks well with people who like like Arpanet, The Black Dog, and Sleeparchive. I didn't pick them, the network of listeners on Last.fm did."
While no stranger to utilizing social media for promotion, Noah Pred has spent time doing A&R for other labels in the past. He is rather direct in his prognosis that at the end of the day "at least for underground music...it's the quality of the music that sells the record."
It is worth noting the range of experience artists are having in marketing their music right now; on one end of the spectrum, you have self-publishing and distributing artists tapping into niche communities that span the globe and conversely what Vergel Evans describes as the sad reality of "major artists trying to move away from labels and record stores and retail in business like Starbucks." Artists like Noah and Vergel are a good frame of reference when considering how social media and digital distribution might play out across the music industry in the near future. Given the perennial marginal status of techno in Toronto, it only follows that these artists have to hustle that much harder than your garden variety buzz band.
Noah Pred Photo by basic_sound from the Fukhouse Photoset. Vergel Evans photo by Jofus S.



nice! hadn't heard of this guy, he rules!
also, yeah, sorry vinyl. we love you, but the newest tunes will never be pressed on you. see you in 1999.
Discussion about the evolving intersection of web 2.0 and the music industry tends to gravitate towards the repetition of cliched mantras which (re)announce the death of the major label and champion the democracy of social networking.
I stopped reading this article after this sentence. Just fyi.
is it because the words are too big for you?
I enjoyed your article greg!
while i would agree that the market and marketing/distribution opportunities have blossomed exponentially as a result of digital audio technologies, i wonder if the market size in dollar value has grown to match. Sure vinyl may be expensive to manufacture and distribute, but a lot of people (used to) have jobs as a result. Perhaps the fact that Noah and Vergel still have to hustle as musicians in a digitally-liberated world is not a result of local marginalisation (as there are no longer distribution barriers) but rather a sign that there is less money to be made selling music today, not more... I really wonder if people are spending as much $$ on music overall as compared to a decade ago.
regarding the above feedback.
People aren't spending as much money on music as they were a decade ago, at least that is what we should believe if we listen to the majors and the RIAA. I think what is missing from their math is the countless independent labels logging meager sales though, I know lots of these labels are struggling (and well, dying as well).. but if I'm wearing my "Long Tail" coloured glasses I am likely to see this as a movement afoot since say Sub Pop blew up. It is like cable television, we certainly don't live in a universe dominated by 3 channels anymore, I think the market is harder to track, and much to the chagrin of the majors, control, as consumers distribute their buying dollars across the market and start investing into "subsistence" boutique labels rather than padding the profit margins of the majors.
If this change in the shape of the market is democratizing to independent musicians, I do think people are less willing to shell out for the CD because it is a bloated artifact, not unlike a full tank of gas, or a slab of wax. The single as reinvented through digital distribution is useful, although it comes wrapped in a whole host of problems as well.
Music as an "owned" artifact is a 20th century phenomena, before that the only "ownership" of music was from publication. For the most parts musicians have always made a living through performance and patronage, not output. The definitive text on this subject is Jacques Attali's "Noise: The Political Economy of Music".
I think techno is an interesting frame of reference, I've heard artists (Jeff Milligan specifically) talk about the idea of releasing EP's simply as the average business person would distribute business cards, as pro-bono self-promotion to generate performance opportunities.
Ok, enough rambling for the moment..
Greg J. Smith