August 23, 2007
This Projekt Gets A Failing Grade

Photo of My Chemical Romance in California by cantsaynotohope.
Immediately upon entering the grounds of the Molson Amphitheatre Tuesday night, we realized that Projekt Revolution was not aimed at us, as we are no longer an awkward, alienated 14-year-old with oddly coloured hair (though we did see one lady who looked to be at least 55 wearing a Linkin Park shirt). We decided we would try to have a good time nonetheless. For the most part, we failed.
We arrived just in time for the main stage portion of the day. First up was Julien K: a band featuring two members of Orgy. The new band sounds very similar to Orgy, with their industrial-lite, Stabbing Westward vibe. And as with many of the bands who came later, their lead singer was prone to yelling ridiculous, pseudo-rebellious phrases. The most inadvertently hilarious was an anecdote about how they don’t even have a record out yet—they wanted to come and have fans discover the band before "some tired-ass record label" told them to. Right. Because a tour headlined by Linkin Park has nothing to do with giant, "tired-ass" record labels. The band’s music was mostly forgettable, and we were convinced at one point that their bass player was simply hitting random notes at any old time. Not a great start.
Placebo was next, and they were definitely a step up. Taking the stage to the opening strains of their biggest hit, "Pure Morning," they blasted out a crunchy version of the immensely catchy song. They divided their set between older tracks, like "Every Me and Every You," "Special K" and "Taste In Men" and cuts from their overlooked newest album Meds, including a moving, crowd-pleasing rendition of the title track. Overall, the band had an energy and aggressiveness you wouldn't expect based on their recordings—their set was one of the more earnest and enjoyable.
Speaking of enjoyable, other big festivals could learn something from Projekt Revolution in terms of set changes. The mere fifteen minutes between bands was one of the most impressive aspects of the show, especially considering some of the complicated sets.
If Julien K were atrocious and Placebo were excellent, then Finnish band HIM fell somewhere in between. The audience, though, went positively insane for everything they did. HIM's dark pop-metal was well-executed, technically, and featured some ear-catching melodies. And while the song has been covered a million times before, their version of Chris Isaak's "Wicked Game" was actually pretty good. It was the next song, "Your Sweet Six Six Six" that was so self-serious that it was funny, complete with lyrics sung in a growly demon voice. The set ended on an unfortunate note, with lead singer Ville Valo following the phrase "This is a song about how hard it is when you lose someone" immediately with, "don't forget to spend all your money on Linkin Park merch," while opening his jacket to show off his hoodie. If there was any doubt about the merch-minded focus of the festival, that cleared it right up.
Taking Back Sunday's biggest strengths are their tag team vocals and knack for incredibly catchy hooks, both of which came through on Tuesday. With help from a guest drummer and a guitarist from second stage act Saosin, the band blasted through hits and fan favourites like "You're So Last Summer," "Cute Without The 'E' (Cut From The Team)" and "A Decade Under The Influence." Lead singer Adam Lazarra won points for gutsiest stage banter of the night for following a story about going to see Justin Timberlake at the ACC with the comment, "There's all these meatheads in the audience like 'Uh-uhh, no way."
Taking antagonistic audience interaction even further was My Chemical Romance frontman Gerard Way, dolled up in skull makeup. For their entire set he was goading the audience into some sort of reaction, whether it was commanding them, "scream!" and "everybody in this whole place clap!" or pitting the girls against the boys by insisting the females were screaming louder. It reeked of a need for validation—when your band is doing its job, you don't have to rile up the crowd with your stage banter.
That said, their show was fairly high-energy, with bombastic versions of made-for-the-stadium tracks like "Welcome To The Black Parade," "Mama" (sadly without a cameo by Liza Minnelli, who sings on the album version) and "Helena." After an intense set full of bursts of flames shooting up from the back of the stage, firecracker explosions and balls-out rock, MCR ended anticlimactically with the quieter track "Cancer."
It was at this point that we decided to pack it in. Soggy from the rain, we couldn't handle the idea of sticking around for Linkin Park. We had a feeling they'd do no wrong in the crowd's eyes. While to us the day was full of cheesy between-song banter, over-inflated frontman egos and mostly mediocre music, for the people it mattered to, it was probably the best day of the summer, despite (or maybe because of) the clouds.
Photo of Placebo at the Sziget Festival 2006 by alexis suspicious.


You seem to be very opinionated and judgmental - i.e. Full of Hot Air. You barely said anything positive about the whole show. Maybe you should start going to events open-mindedly and stop being so "emo"… especially if you are going to write an article about it afterwards. If you ever want to get –anywhere- worthwhile in your career, you are going to have to stop being such a fucking "over-inflated" journalist.
Grow up. The show was awesome and definitely worthwhile.
a different guest says:
I have to disagree with #1. Surely there are throngs of people who would appreciate the show, but the reviewer doesn't have to be one of them. I can't imagine enjoying myself at such a show.
Also, your post has some logical fallacies in it. You raise approximately one point, wrapped in a paragraph of insults.
@ #1:
a reviewer has absolutely no obligation to appease those who view something in a positive light. demanding her to "grow up" merely displays your inability to accept her absolutely valid opinion, and frankly does little more than show everyone your own immaturity.
Why do I picture guest #1 as Jay Bruer, the guy from SNL and "Halk-Baked"?
"Dude, youdontknowwhatyertalkinbout, that show was totally far-out AWE-SUM, phhhffffffftttt, you just don't get it, man, you can't write, you need to totally grow up and get a real job...
Hey man, you hungry? Cheetos, man ,come on...Whose with me?"
"...Reporters find the sources for their work, their reports can be either spoken or written, and they are generally expected to report in the most objective and unbiased way to serve the public good."
Hmmm, maybe you guys should educate yourselves as to what a reporter is actually "supposed" to do. This reporter clearly went into this show biased as evidenced in their own words, "We decided we would try to have a good time nonetheless."
So #3, they are very much so entitled to their opinion, but as #1 was trying to say, they are supposed to have an unbiased outlook. Clearly, this reporter did not.
You're confusing news and opinion. News articles, which strive for balance, are completely different than reviews. The entire point of a review is to have an opinion. I'm not a reporter, I'm a reviewer, and there's a big difference. Maybe you should educate yourself on the different functions of journalism.
I went in as a huge fan of Taking Back Sunday and My Chemical Romance. But I'm not so blinded by fandom that I couldn't see and accept flaws in the show. And you were sadly mistaken in a few places in your first comment, too. First, that I "barely said anything positive." I actually said lots of positive things. I said good things about every single band except for Julien K. Second, you claim that I won't get anywhere as a journalist. I'm doing pretty well already. And I'm not trying to make a career of reviewing concerts. I'm trying to make a career of audio production. So I'm not entirely full of hot air.
er, what were you expecting from a Linkin Park concert?
i loved that last line. it truly nailed the spirit of the article for me.
and i'm sorry stupid commenters, but i think this writer did a fabulous job of not throwing in all kinds of cliche things, such as whining about how much a band used to be awesome and now sucks (i have fallen prey to this way too many times). and fyi, if you wanna get technical about writing, in journalism school they talk about a little thing called 'showing not telling'. and if you think it's easy to first figure out what the hell that means and then second translate that understanding into a written piece of work, guess again. good job carly, f the naysayers. and extra bravos for using the word crunchy in the context of describing sound. i love it when that happens.
I have to agree, I think this was a good review. However, I DO notice that an inordinate amount of music reviews on TOist seem to be overly indie/emo biased. Not a fault of the reviewers, but perhaps more a fault of TOist.
Really? Linkin Park is indie now?
Yeah, I'd have say the show was pretty much the antithesis of indie. Linkin Park are on a major label and have, as far as I know, the best selling album of 2007. Emo, maybe—though commenter #1 accused me of being emo because I didn't like the show. It's all so confusing!
I mean, all the indie bands you review seem to have positive reviews, and all the non-indie bands you review get scathing reviews. Perhaps thats because the reviewers are already saying "Linkin Park, ugh", and are less likely to be a little more objective.
Again, I'm not saying this is a bad or erroneous review, but lately I've stopped reading the reviews on TOist with as much attention, as I can predict the outcome before I read it, based on the band, the reviewer, and the headline.
I can promise you I didn't go there intending to go "Ughh." I didn't go because Torontoist told me to, I went because I'm a fan of Taking Back Sunday and My Chemical Romance. I'm definitely not an indie snob. My favourite band is the Smashing Pumpkins, who are pretty much the uncoolest band to like right now. I love Fall Out Boy and I love Top 40 pop. Who knows, maybe indie bands put on better shows because they can't afford to coast? I've always thought Billy Corgan sounds horrible live, and I surmise it's because he knows that even if he puts no effort in, people will still show up.