Nips And Tucks For The Toronto Star

star_redesign_box.jpg

Following in the footsteps of The Globe and Mail, which launched a redesign on April 23, that good ol' battleaxe Toronto Star arrived on the newsstand this morning with its own facelift (free today at most local retailers). And we actually like it.

Readers of print media tend to balk at change, and sometimes, if a look ain't broke, it usually don't need no fixin' (see: Ontario logo redesign). But the newspaper industry is ridiculously competitive, and while no amount of radical surgery can save the Sun, the Star sits at the top of the heap with 2.2 million readers weekly and 400 editorial staff. A high-stakes revamp of a paper's entire look can be a scary exercise in shareholder relations and hate mail management. star_redesign_logos.gif"We know that some people dislike change," said Editor-In-Chief J. Fred Kuntz in a May 19 column, "but no newspaper should stagnate."

The Star's new look, which hasn't yet met a Garamond Narrow it doesn't like, actually somewhat resembles the design of the Ottawa Citizen; a paper run by mortal enemies CanWest MediaWorks. We've discovered that the new Star seems to be much more readable, with a slightly larger type size and greater leading (pronounced "ledding," which is the space between lines of text). It is also clearly apparent that the paper intends to focus more on local news, especially from the GTA—a formerly standalone section that is being melded right into the world news of Section A. In fact, the Star is now branding itself as "The Voice of the GTA" in their nameplate banner.

It's also going to be a bit skinnier, with an inch shaved off the width. The new size starts rolling off the presses in August, with all presses converted by October. In their somewhat overly ebullient press release, the new size is touted as "easier to open" (wha?) and "greener, more environmentally friendly." Mind you, printing 500,000 weekly copies of the country's thickest paper isn't exactly sustainable environmentalism, but it's still half a million less inches of newsprint per week, we guess. A large aspect of the new layout structure is also unabashedly meant to appeal to advertisers, who will buy in modular units instead of the per-line standard format.

star_redesign.jpg

What interests us more, however, is the relatively new blog the Star launched, with the obvious intention to appeal to a younger, more web-savvy and allegedly hipper readership (like Torontoist readers?). Dubbed Sketch, the blog features more, um, bloglike content, with short and intentionally pithy remnants of arts and entertainment news mined from the paper's staff. Now, we're no experts on what blogging is all about—waitaminnit, yes we are—but Sketch is totally missing its mark. The posts are dry, infrequent, a little too try-hard, and severely lacking in much needed visuals. Sadly, one constant seems to say it all: Comments (0)

The Star Media Group originally launched a much better effort, Paved, at the end of 2005, which had a great logo and lasted for less than a year. Promoted at the time in little corners of the Star website but conflicted over its purpose, this was the project closest to a true city blog at a time when the concept was still relatively new.

The National Post has also recently dipped some toes into the blogosphere with more success—their entries on Posted are actually more like repurposed newswire material, so there's less risk of embarrassment when trying to seem cool or current, and the content is often quirky and interesting. At least both the Post and the Star allow reader comments, unlike some wannabe blog facsimiles from other mainstream media outlets.

We're usually pretty picky about all things design, so we were pleasantly surprised to find that the Star's new look pretty much delivers on its promises, and we're all for the increased coverage of general interest "lifestyle" content. As for online, the Star Media Group also just launched Wheels.ca, meant as a shot across the bow of CanWest's Driving.ca, and the Star's main web portal was entirely redesigned back in January. But the blogs—oy. Sketch is a barren wasteland that can't hold a candle to the linked sites in its own sidebar (of which Torontoist is one, at least for now), but then there was the engaging azerbic blog, woefully killed dead by the administration after Antonia Zerbisias lost control over runaway comments (usually involving arguments over Israel and feminism).

So—lots afoot at the Star these days, and while they seem to have a winner for the new printed edition, we respectfully suggest that blogs ain't their bag. After all, the Urban Dictionary defines "sketch" as something that is "a little strange or out of place." 'Nuff said.

Comments (18) [rss]

I find the most jarring change to be the reduction in the amount of content (or at least the quantity of individual stories) per page, but I can't yet tell whether there is less content in the paper overall.

user-pic

You like the Star redesign? Don't you guys know you're not supposed to admit you do? The proper etiquette with newspaper redesigns is to scoff, decry what's been lost, and offer design suggestions of your own.

Thanks for not plumping for that cheap gag.

user-pic

The new Globe looks like crap. I liked it better as it was.

The Star actually doesn't look half bad.

user-pic

I've been poring over the print edition in more depth this morning and I'm actually quite impressed. I realize they've been prototyping for months, but they seem to have it right out of the gate today. I like the subtle but modern pullquote look, and the increased whitespace is clearly easier to read—the previous incarnation was really mushed together. I also like how they've also resisted the urge to go all super-modern, à la the Globe. Gotta give them props this time around!

user-pic

I like the design of community newspapers, grocery flyers and garage sale posters. Therefore, I like the new Toronto Star. The lack of contrast and unity really pleases me. I love those multicolored section banners with nothing on them. Why not? Plain banners! Go with it!!!! And how many fonts shall we use??? 10!!!!!! Let's use 10 different fonts in the paper!

user-pic

Gee Scott, you are so right on the money.

There's something simple, nostalgic, retro and, um, totally USA Today from the 80s. I like how the pages feel so unstructured and boring... sort of like Toronto. That's the problem with the Globe, it looks too smart, well-designed and non-Toronto. The Star's new design doesn't look at all rushed... obviously the designers used the last few months wisely rather than use the extra time until the presses change to make the paper any better. How can it be any better... it's perfection. Designers could learn a thing or three from the Star. I just wish they had completely removed that boring unique ribbon that screams "Toronto Star".

And what's wrong with the Sun's design?

user-pic

Spencer: There isn't any? Their website is also terrible.

I wonder how it's easier to open. Is each page a big magnet that repels each other page, or something? 'Cause I'd fucking subscribe in a second if it was like that.

user-pic

I thought the front page banner from the last design (last week) was very effective. It was bold, smart and very well branded. Sure, the print quality changed day-to-day. Navy? Purple???!!! MAGENTA???!!!!!! but the banner worked very well.

Now the section front doesn't hold presence. The banner has been scaled down to 10% of it's original size and the top half of the front is soft and very light. It says "Voice of the GTA" on the front... and ummmm... absolutely nothing (!) on the following section fronts.

The paper is *very* USA Today, you're right.
In fact, the paper is *very* Pensacola Journal.

Calgary Herald, Windsor Star, you name it...

*Insert generic newspaper here*

user-pic

David Topping, thank you for making my day. :)

What's wrong with the Sun's design? Oh, where to start...?

I would love it if they could find a way to build in a feature that would allow only me to pick up my paper in the morning. It gets stolen on average once a weekend, but this weekend it got stolen both days. I was ranting to my boyfriend that next weekend I am going to hide and wait for someone to steal it and then jump out and yell at them. Or possibly tie the paper to some fishing line and then yank on it from out of sight and scare the crap out of them. Grrr.

People who steal newspapers are from the same pool as those who steal people's lunches from the office refrigerator. I mean, who does that?!

user-pic

I've thought about it some more and I realize I can now die a happy man knowing the Star is now the best designed newspaper in the world. Oh, the Post held onto that for so long, but now the Star has reached the pinnacle of news design. It's amazing. I'm so excited I won't be able to sleep for days. I mean this is tremendous improvement. Years from now people will remember this design (and the designer) with equal importance to some of the best graphic design of the 20th century -- masters like Paul Rand or Saul Bass. The Globe pales in comparsion and the Post is now but a simple rag. I like now the masthead on the cover is nearly unreadable or how they've varied the width of columns just for the hell of it -- why bother following a grid or creating a focal point on each page. It's cool how the columnist's photos run in the second column when the first would make much more sense. They've done things that are so totally against the norm, yet the paper still looks like a regular daily. And yeah Scott, I'd agree it does look like the Calgary Herald, Windsor Star, the Record (formerly know as the Kitchener-Waterloo Record) and scores of other papers. Who wants there daily paper to stand out and be different like the Globe.

Admittedly, it has been awhile since I was able to read the Sun without vomitting, but come on, the design is amazing. But not quite as good as the Star.

Good to see that people have taken a healthy dose of their sarcasm pills today.

user-pic

I think it was a mistake to reduce the blue ribbon and take it away from the paper's name like that. Now "Toronto Star" is just two large words on the page, their page presence is almost completely lost -- they even buried it behind Spiderman. Other than that without having a copy on hand I can't say much.

user-pic

The sarcasm levels in Spencer's posts are off the fucking scales. By the way, it's so clever how he says one thing while meaning another. I've never seen anyone do that before! Brilliant!

user-pic

I've noticed how the editorial typography now looks a whole lot more like the "fake news-item" typography that's often used in advertising.

Perhaps this was deliberate? OH NOES!!!

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

TIP US OFF

Tip us off with news, leads, links; anything at all.

About Torontoist

Torontoist is about Toronto and everything that happens in it. It's edited by David Topping and published by Gothamist. More about us.

What's On Today

Recent Comments

The Tall Poppy Interview

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Torontoist.

All Our RSS