

It was an ambitious experiment for a mainstream media company: create a free, five-city daily newspaper that felt more like a slim alt-weekly, with a little tabloid thrown in. Launched on April 4, 2005 and shuttered last May, Dose was known for its usually striking cover art, often created by local illustrators and photographers in conjunction with the in-house art department.
Dose was started as a multimedia brand, combining print, mobile and online properties (the online component is still thriving). The print portion—labeled as a magazine despite being on newsprint—enjoyed about 331,000 daily readers by the time it was shut down by parent company CanWest, owners of the National Post and eleven other traditional newspapers across Canada.
We liked how Dose put an emphasis on the visual arts community, so we tracked-down former Editor-In-Chief Pema Hegan to tell us about the creative process behind Dose's 270 cover designs.

One of the most striking things about Dose was its cover. Why did you choose to go in this direction rather than featuring full stories on the front page like other dailies?
We believed the cover was our single biggest opportunity to introduce new readers to Dose. It needed to reach out to people walking past the box, and that is hard to do with a busy front page full of stories. We thought the best approach was to focus on a single issue/idea and find a smart and visually interesting way to communicate it. The Esquire covers that George Lois created in the 1960s were a big inspiration.
What was the creative process for deciding on a cover?
We would come up with a few ideas in the morning news meeting and at noon, the editors and art department would huddle up to answer three questions:
1. What are people talking about or could they be talking about today?
2. What one simple idea do we want to communicate about this subject?
3. How can we visually express this idea in the most simple, powerful way?
Sometimes the meetings were a fun fifteen minutes and sometimes they were a difficult hour. After the meeting, the designers, editors, photographers and illustrators had seven hours to execute the idea and create the cover. I was constantly amazed by what a great job they did in such a short time.
Are there some memorable covers that you had to pull together at the eleventh hour?
The London underground bombing on July 7, 2005 sticks in my mind. Early on we made a decision go beyond just reporting the news and try to paint a picture of what it felt like to be a young person in London on that day—the confusion and fear. At lunchtime, our editors and reporters called everyone we knew in London and asked them to capture the feeling in their city with words and photos. As we waited for the material to come in, we worried if it would come together, but by the end of the day we managed to publish an issue full of cell phone photos and first-person stories that I think set Dose apart from other coverage.
Were there any covers you agonized over or couldn't decide on?
We had an amazing cover planned for our launch issue...and then the Pope died. We had to rethink our strategy and create a new cover in 48 hours. We had more than fifty options pinned to the wall before making an agonizing decision on which direction to take. The first time is always the hardest. I still have nightmares about that day.
Did you ever run into controversy with any of your covers?
I once had a telephone death threat for a cover about the re-branding of Canada. We had illustrated a beaver being impaled by a flagpole. A bit brutal, I know, but we wanted to express the idea of getting rid of the clichéed icons Canada is know for around the world and replace them with something new and interesting like the music, art and design being created here. The chap called from his office and forgot to hide his number. I called him back to explain why I thought impaling a beaver had been a good way to tell the story and he was very embarrassed.
Did your corporate parent CanWest ever have a say in what would go on the cover?
No. We had nothing but compliments from the high-ups at CanWest.
Were there particular covers that instigated a lot of reader feedback?
Because of our covers we got calls and emails accusing us of being left wing, right wing, homophobic, gay propagandists, prudes, sex-obsessed, blasphemers and church promoters—sometimes all in the same week. The objective of the covers was to get people thinking and talking. We certainly achieved that!
Do you have a favourite cover?
The team did a great job on covers leading up to the 2006 election—definitely some of my favourites. I think they presented politics in a fresh and sometimes surprising way. Voter turnout in 2006 was up almost 5% for voters under 25. Maybe the Dose take on politics helped contributed to that? [According to an Ipsos-Reid readership poll conducted on behalf of CanWest, Dose reached almost one-in-ten 18 to 24-year-olds daily. —Ed.]
What was the reason given for shuttering Dose?
The press release from CanWest said, "we feel the printed publication will not produce the financial results we expect over the long term."
Describe the day of the announcement, and what that was like for you and the staff.
The president of CanWest came down to our open-plan newsroom and delivered the news. About sixty people lost their jobs that day. It was obviously very sad. We were all so proud of what we had achieved at Dose that the sadness didn't last too long—by 9 p.m. we were at Squirly's having a drink.
What are the staff doing these days?
The staff were some of the most talented people I have ever met and, almost without fail, they are doing great things. Some moved to Canadian media companies—The Globe and Mail, Toronto Star, Maclean's, MTV, Much Music—and some left the country to work for organizations like Creativity magazine and the BBC.


Where have you moved on to now?
The ex-publisher of Dose [Noah Godfrey] and I are building GigPark; a website to help people share recommendations with their friends.
As a New Zealander transplanted three years ago to Canada, what's your take on our media in comparison?
Media is changing so fast. Most of the people reading Torontoist now probably create almost as much "media" as they consume. Because of this, I think the biggest difference between "media" in Canada and New Zealand isn't anything the TV channels or newspapers are doing; it's the difference in broadband penetration—8% in New Zealand compared to 22% here. New Zealand has a connection problem that needs to be fixed.
What have you discovered about Toronto that you didn't expect?
The creative community. I think it rivals London, where I lived for three years. I love this city.


Images: CanWest MediaWorks

Elsewhere in the Ist-a-Verse
The day I refused to pick up Dose again was when they ran a cover of a cartoon Balinda Stronach in a business suit that highlighted her bursting-at-the-seams clevage with the headline "Blonde bombshell." It was the day after she crossed the floor.
Stronach's professional and political leanings are usually in conflict with my own but I certainly found depicting her as just a scantily clad blonde to be inconsistent with reality and full of overt sexism.
Interestingly, when I sent Dose an email to complain and asked them to write me back with their justification for running the image I heard nothing at all. I guess a complaint about blatantly sexist social commentary isn't as worthy of a response as, say, a complaint about an impaled beaver.
Here's a great analysis of how the media handled Stronach, including the "Blonde Bombshell" headline, which this article says was actually the National Post's. It could have been Dose's as well, but I don't remember that particular cover.
I can't judge for myself without seeing the cover and certainly don't discount your thoughts on it, but given the context of Dose, was it possible that it was actually satirizing the obsession over her looks? The Art Director and creator of all the Dose covers is also a woman (not that that means your points are invalid).
Great post Marc.
"Most of the people reading Torontoist now probably create almost as much 'media' as they consume."
Didn't he learn from the Dose experience to put down this old saw? Guess not, since he's working on a startup dependent upon "user-generated content".
Dose was one of the most immature excuses for Jackass that anyone could have thought of. It died because it was crap...plain and simple. It failed before it started.
"DOSE: We're Fu***ng Great"
Doublespeak -- Can you elaborate? Seems to me that the lines between audience and creator *are* more blurred than ever. You make it sound like a fad that's had its day. Where do you get that idea?
I was never a huge fan of Dose, but I grew to admire their risk-taking and their story selection. It had a place in a reader's broader media diet, though I would never rely on it as my sole source of news.
Dose tried message boards and blogs as a means of harvesting free content, and nobody cared. (The volunteer-run Torontoist had more buzz at the time.) Seemed to be a pattern throughout mainstream media trying to get their paws on the traffic afforded a Flickr or Facebook, and material for a few articles every day.
Building any online business based on people doing the writing for you just seems dodgy to begin with.
Digg, YouTube, and blogs are crucial examples of how user-generated content can be extremely powerful today. Just being able to effortlessly interact with media—just as we're doing in these comments in response to an article—is not some passing, pie-in-the-sky idea. Though there will always be mainstream media with slickly-produced content, the creation process is being democratized at a much higher rate, and not only are media companies finding that two-way interaction useful to enhance their own content, but users are increasingly demanding it.
No disagreement there, but Dose was launched with all sorts of hollow hoopla about how they were going to lean on readers.
...and that's why you remember the professionally produced covers, and everything else about the rag was instantly forgotten. "Yesterday's internet news today" wasn't much of a selling point to begin with.
Digg and YouTube et al weren't created to funnel material up to a print publication or DVD distributor though, were they?
The only thing I liked about Dose was its art direction. That, and the black metal boxes; I loved how they got scraped up so the bare metal came through in such contrast.
This reminds me of the Dose vs Sun war at Front and Bay each week.
A gauntlet of people shoving papers in your face shouting "Free Dose", "Free Toronto Sun".
I don't think I ever saw someone take a Sun.
I remember around the time that it launched that the Dose issues in the boxes around my neighbourhood would be replaced in the morning with bundles of NOW. Hawkers from Metro were also aggressively shoving their issues into the paths of pedestrians...it was a crazy time.
What a timely piece. I wonder if you guys can find some more magazines that went under and see what they're up to. Oh, and while you're at it can you find out what the guys that used to run the Pizza Pizza down the street from me are doing these days.
Excellent hating, Billy.