October 14, 2006
Pitfield Rips Off Spacing!

One more piece of bad news for Jane Pitfield's campaign: besides having one of the worst glamour shots we've ever seen on her media page (see above), whoever's writing her blog for her is cribbing Spacing Votes, Spacing Magazine's election blog. Details are a bit scarce, but what we know for sure so far is that for several days a recent entry on Jane Pitfield's blog copied one of John Lorinc's - almost word for word - without credit.
Here's John Lorinc's post:
How else to explain the paper-thin promise he made yesterday — $28 million to Toronto’s 13 distressed neighbourhoods, spread over four years. Do the math, and that works out to be just over $500,000 per neighbourhood per year — a bit less than what the city’s works department requested last winter to hire six new enforcement officers. In fact, the annual cost of Miller’s new program adds up to a princely 0.1% of the city’s total spending .... Municipal spending alone won’t solve the problems for young people growing up in poor neighbourhoods, but it’s hard to imagine that what Miller plans to ante up will do much other than generate a few more summer jobs.
Now, Pitfield's:
David Miller made a thin promise yesterday — $28 million to Toronto’s 13 distressed neighbourhoods, spread over four years. That works out to be just over $500,000 per neighbourhood per year — a bit less than what the city’s works department requested last winter to hire six new enforcement officers. In fact, the annual cost of Miller’s new program adds up to just 0.1% of the city’s total spending. This amounts to very little for at-risk youth. Municipal spending alone won’t solve the problems for young people growing up in distressed neighbourhoods. These steps won’t do much other than generate a few more summer jobs.
This isn't the first time that Spacing hasn't gotten proper credit for their work - back in July, the National Post copied an article by Shawn Micallef into the paper without his permission, though that mess got cleaned up quickly.
As this article went live, Pitfield's campaign has just added the following credit to her entry: (Source: John Lorinc on Spacing.ca) . Now, how about an apology?
Update [October 14, 2006, 8:47 PM]: The plot thickens! Now Pitfield's blog is missing the article altogether. Luckily, Google's cached version of the page still shows the original blog post, without credit. Unfortunately for Pitfield, deletion isn't adequate damage control at this point.
Update [October 16, 2006, 12:18 AM]: The blog's gone now, replaced with a list of Pitfield's stances on a bunch of topics. Spacing actually got on the phone with Pitfield on Saturday, and she told them that "there hasn’t always been a clear plan of what to do with my blog...I have a young man looking after it. But I will talk to someone at our office right away." According to Matt Blackett, "There has been no apology or returned phone call. I cornered her at City hall during an election event. The closest it came to an apology was “I’ll look into this.""
You can watch the drama unfold over at Spacing Votes.


Sounds like Jane's "blog" is just updated by some lackey on her campaign staff (does anyone really think she writes it herself?). Also note that her October 3rd entry is ripped almost verbatim from an July 10th Anthony Reinhart column in The Globe And Mail. Classy.
I hate that everyone and their momma calls their web page a blog now. Pitfield needs some schooling about what a blog is, which is not just a frequently updated page of campaign blurbs. If you're gonna call it a blog, at least have a comments forum for each entry, which I highly doubt any mayoral candidate would ever do.
No fan of Pitfield here, and she's digging her own grave throughout this campaign with stuff like this -- but why does Torontoist insist on squeezing everything through some too-cool hipster filter: there was no need to make the glamour shot comment. It's mean, and makes it hard to take this blog seriously. Shame on you.
I'm insulting it because it was clearly done in two minutes with the magnetic lasso tool in Photoshop. And then there's that cream-colored background. I'm no Photoshop wizard, but...have you looked at that photo?
It's not being mean. She paid good money for that "glamour shot" and I figure even her campaign staff would've realized that it looks pretty terrible. Hundreds if not thousands of people might see that photo over the span of a campaign, at least make it look good.
My mom could recognize that as shoddy work, and she still uses the word "slacks" as a noun. You don't have to be mean or hip to notice how that photo is born of the same work ethic as the decision to copy-paste other bloggers' words.
Hmm...the Globe and Mail article is still up and unattributed, with her own editorializing within it. I wonder if her team doesn't yet know they've been busted on that either.
Oops, nevermind. The Globe article was also excised.
If you're curious to read the two takes of that one:
ANTHONY REINHART IN THE GLOBE AND MAIL (July 10):
More clear are the signs that the ratio of employers to residents is changing in Toronto. Most of the many construction cranes operating in the city have been building condominiums, not office buildings. So while the city's population continues to grow, the number of jobs has been dropping by about 1 per cent each year for several years.
The Toronto Office Coalition says the job market has shed 100,000 positions since 1990, while the 905 has gained 800,000 jobs in the same period. Pointing to ever-increasing outbound traffic during the morning rush hours, business groups have been warning loudly that the city is becoming a bedroom of the suburbs, in a stark reversal of the conventional pattern.
JANE PITFIELD ON HER BLOG (October 3):
The ratio of employers to residents is changing in Toronto. Most of the construction cranes operating in the city have been building condominiums, not office buildings. So while the city's population continues to grow, the number of jobs has been dropping by about 1 per cent each year for several years.
The Toronto Office Coalition says the job market has shed 100,000 positions since 1990, while the 905 has gained 800,000 jobs in the same period. Pointing to ever-increasing outbound traffic during the morning rush hours, business groups have been warning that the city is becoming a bedroom of the suburbs.