Today Fri Sat
It is forcast to be Clear at 10:00 PM EST on February 09, 2012
Clear
4°/-1°
It is forcast to be Mostly Cloudy at 10:00 PM EST on February 10, 2012
Mostly Cloudy
5°/-9°
It is forcast to be Partly Cloudy at 10:00 PM EST on February 11, 2012
Partly Cloudy
1°/-5°

34 Comments

news

The ‘Stop the Violence’ Campaign

candlelitgrief.jpg
On Yonge Street just north of Elm Street, in front of the store in which 15-year-old Jane Creba killed by an errant bullet, a group of about 200 gathered to mourn the deaths of all those killed by guns in 2005. There was a moment of silence before each candle was dedicated to a shooting victim; one candle for any one of the 52 victims. Organizer Himy Syed placed his candle down for Jane Creba.
Around 5 pm, one lane of traffic on Yonge Street was closed as crowds gathered for the somber candlelit vigil. Each speaker gave a brief speech to the crowd. The message – delivered by friends and relatives of the victims, strangers and politicians – was like a sad broken record: Stop gun violence.
upstairsatvigil.jpg
On-lookers gathering at the upstairs pub.
lewisreford.jpgOne unfortunate situation at the event was the presence of some politicians currently involved in the federal election. Lewis Reford, Conservative candidate for Toronto Centre-Rosedale, was seen giving his Conservative Christmas card to supporters in the crowd.
Torontoist, already disgusted with Stephen Harper using this tragic shooting death to attract voters, looked to verify that a Conservative candidate was distributing campaign materials at the event. Mr. Reford, at the back of the crowd, was easily noticed since he was decked out in various Conservative apparel. In true campaign form, he did in fact give us a Christmas card (pictured – and we’re scanner-less, so we do mean pictured).
milleratvigil.jpgLater on, the tacky blue ‘C’ on Mr. Reford’s cap seemed to attract the attention of a few other politically-interested members of the crowd, whom engaged Mr. Reford into discussion. This group, though not Mr. Reford, quietly heckled Mayor David Miller as he was called upon to light a candle (also pictured, in blurry black cap).
Next – though not nearly as inappropriate – was incumbant Trinity-Spadina MP Tony Ianno. Torontoist stood next to a respectful Mr. Ianno for the bulk of the ceremony. Though when his rival Olivia Chow dedicated a candle with city councilor Pam McConnell, Mr. Ianno brusquely side-stepped us to get to the front (a campaign push?).
The irony of this situation involving Mr. Reford and Mr. Ianno was in a message from a relative of a shooting victim. In her dedication, the grieving woman asked that politicians not use her crisis to win an election, but rather to come together to find solutions. In both candidates’ defence, the woman did not mention anything about handing out Christmas cards or shoving toward the television camera at a candlelit vigil for shooting victims.

Comments

  • billonlogan

    Reality Check from The Globe and Mail’s Margaret Wente…
    In Toronto, we had a race to see which came first: the New Year’s baby, or the New Year’s gun murder. The baby won, but not by much. Before the day dawned on 2006, 21-year-old Dillan Yhanike Anderson was shot dead in an alley in his silver Cadillac Seville.
    His passing did not inspire the same outpouring of grief and outrage as the death of Jane Creba, the 15-year-old who was cut down in the Boxing Day shootout. I suspect no one will be rushing to hold candlelight vigils for him. Is this racist? The CBC seems to think so. “Poor black victims are being forgotten,” one expert opined. “There just seems to be a double standard when it comes to white middle-class people.”
    Well, hold it just a minute. There was quite a fuss when a (black) 4-year-old named Shaquan Cadougan took four bullets in his little body last summer. Fortunately, he didn’t die, but he, too, was an innocent bystander. Most of Toronto’s other gun victims are not. Mr. Anderson, for example, was on probation for shooting another man in the head in 2003. Another difference might be the fact that Ms. Creba got shot in broad daylight, in the heart of mainstream Canada, on a day when millions of people go out to shop and have fun. In other words, if she’s not safe, who is?…
    Far from focusing our attention on the real issues, the murder of Ms. Creba seems to have inspired new levels of weaseling and fatuity. “These are Harris’s children, because they were 5 or 6 years old [when Mike Harris became premier of Ontario in 1995], and these were the kids that got neglected,” one community activist told the Toronto Star, referring to thugs who shoot innocent bystanders in broad daylight. “A decade of neglect in Toronto is coming back to haunt us,” declared Olivia Chow, who’s running for office. “How many more innocents will it take?”..
    …Meantime, the gun-murder rate in Jamaica is among the highest in the world. But nobody mentioned that. In fact the word “Jamaica” can’t be found in any of these penetrating analyses, even though police will tell you off the record that 80 per cent or more of the city’s gun crime is Jamaican-related.
    The violent culture of Jamaica sheds far more light on Toronto’s gun-and-gang problem than Mr. Harris’ cruel decision to shut down the Anti-Racism Secretariat. All the black kids know this; they understand the pervasive influence of gangsta culture far better than our media experts and community leaders…
    Are we failing our most disadvantaged kids? Damn right. We’re failing them with our evasions and our cowardice. We are failing them with our reluctance to tell the truth. How many more innocents will it take? I shudder to think.

  • alanTdot

    Where is Andrew Spicer now?
    What a tool this Lewis Redford is. And for conservative supporters/hacks to heckle quietly when the Mayor is called to light a candle is asinine.

  • alanTdot

    oh Bill..
    how are we so stupid as not to realize the truth in front of our noses?!
    Lets stop any Jamaican immigrants and crime will disappear!
    I didn’t know there were so many Jamaican experts in the anglo-saxon community here in Toronto.
    Bill/Wente – just because you can google up a few facts about Jamaica doesn’t mean you understand anything about it.

  • http://slapdeebarnes.blogspot.com Dave M.

    ‘Cause you know, we Anglo-Saxons know nothing about violence. And we certainly didn’t have a hand in Jamaica’s destabilization in the first place, essentially helping create the entire gang culture by funding various puppet political party leaders and encouraging them to attack each other. But hey, even if it is our fault, why should we have to deal with them when they come over here? Send them back to Afric, uh, Jamaica, right Margaret?

  • billonlogan

    hey i’m no expert, but most people in this city have figured it out, call a spade a spade (not in the racial sense for you PCs)

  • alanTdot

    ……And call an intolerant bigot and intolerant bigot.

  • alanTdot

    ….’an intolerant bigot’ that is…

  • geo

    I don’t agree with the way some people automatically pull the racism card. Ignoring part of the problem is not going to make it disappear. As unsavoury as some facts may be we have to face them to better understand how they can be stopped.
    However, I think Margaret is off the mark blaming Jamaican immigrants. While Jamaica’s problems may have some influence on current events, I suspect it would have the opposite effect. Most people immigrate to Canada for a better life. They will tell their children how bad things were at home for them to have to uproot. Why would they want to recreate that environment here?
    The issue here is how disgusting it is to see politicians trying to use this for political gain. Cheery Christmas cards? WTF is that about? That’s probably the most boneheaded manoeuver I’ve ever heard of. This has been forwarded to all my friends who live in his riding. I suggest everyone do the same.

  • http://www.andrewspicer.com/ Andrew Spicer

    I’m right here, Alan. Yes, I agree Reford’s Christmas card was a tacky choice for the vigil. And Ianno is completely useless.
    But I still don’t understand why Joshua singles out Stephen Harper as disgusting for responding with policy proposals after the shooting when both Jack Layton and Paul Martin did the same thing. I feel that this shooting was such a horrible event that I welcome policy proposals from anyone who thinks they have something that might prevent this in the future.

  • Josh

    i can’t help but think there is a common thread here: when all federal leaders responded to the yonge street, boxing day, broad daylight shooting, they responded with ideas. stephen harper responded with a political attack. (PM and JL did not, i repeat.)
    when there was a very somber candlelit vigil, local mp’s responded with dedication. ianno, for all i know, was trying to make a dedication. reford was definitely campaigning. i think if anyone was to call a spade a spade, it would be calling lewis reford and the conservatives out in their un-savvy and inappropriate political campaigning.

  • Josh

    as for wente, she is basing her entire OPINION (because it is an opinion) on the “off the record police information.” i think we’ll need something a little more substantial before we start in with the ‘what’s wrong with jamaica’ debate.

  • http://www.andrewspicer.com/ Andrew Spicer

    But Layton and Harper both attacked Martin! They both criticized him for inaction (during his government) and weak policy proposals (during the campaign), and I happen to agree with those criticisms.
    If you have reasons for disliking Harper and the Conservatives, that’s fine. But in this case (Harper, not Reford), I don’t feel that you’re being fair or making a lot of sense.

  • Bono

    Toist is off to a roaring start!!! Aboriginals! Politics! People insulting one another… very un-Christmas-like.

  • alanTdot

    You can try and shimmy away from it, but the fact is that Harpers’ comments have a electioneering smell to them that is unmistakable.
    There is no reason for that at a time when emotions are running high and reactionary talk is flying everywhere.
    Wente is trying to secure that coveted conservative spot, well inside the bounds of reproach and tucked neatly beneath contempt.

  • Josh

    i missed any layton comments about martin re: the shooting of jane creba. layton, as i wrote, had an even-handed response. every harper comment i’ve seen has been devoid of ideas, sitting directly in the “political attack” file.
    might be best to post the jack layton comments?

  • http://www.andrewspicer.com/ Andrew Spicer

    Josh, I already did post them, in the previous thread. Here is his complete statement, which was his first response to the shooting.
    “First, Olivia Chow and I want to unreservedly condemn these senseless shootings in downtown Toronto, and we unreservedly condemn the reckless criminals who perpetrated them.
    Our hearts go out to the victims and to their families.
    Second, since it would appear that these crimes were committed with handguns, it is almost certainly true that all of the weapons involved are already illegal – already banned.
    So it is important for Canadians not to be diverted by election rhetoric.
    These crimes remind us that we must get illegal handguns off our streets in Toronto and across Canada. To do that we need tougher border controls, tougher sentencing for weapons offenses, and tougher anti-gang policing, prosecutions and sentencing.
    We need more effective witness protection programs, and more compassionate victim assistance. We also need to get tougher – much tougher – on poverty, unemployment and social exclusion.
    All parties in the current federal election owe Canadians a realistic plan on how they’ll address these issues. We’ll fulfill our own responsibility in this regard in coming days.”
    Note that the second thing he said was an attack on Paul Martin’s policy.
    Note also that he calls on all parties to debate this issue.

  • alanTdot

    Andrew,
    if you can’t see this as a very even handed response (in a volatile atmosphere) that is devoid of partisan hackery – which calls on ALL parties to get something done – and attempts to veer away from simplistic knee jerk reaction, then you simply aren’t being honest.

  • http://www.andrewspicer.com/ Andrew Spicer

    Sure, I totally support and respect what Jack Layton said.
    Here’s what Stephen Harper said and I happen to think it is also an even-handed response.
    That’s my point here… all three leaders are engaged in a valid and respectable debate and we need to decide which one is presenting the best policy proposals.
    “Like all Canadians, I was saddened to hear about the latest outbreak of gun violence on the streets of Toronto.
    “It is hard for me to believe that the Toronto I grew up in is now living through open shootings in the heart of the city, in broad daylight.
    “This latest tragedy is hardly an isolated incident. This year Torontonians have had to confront the reality of a growing wave of violent crime that has shaken their sense of security and social stability. Simply put, this violence must end.
    “I would like to express my condolences to the family of the young girl whose life was taken so senselessly yesterday. My thoughts and prayers join all Canadians for each of the surviving victims and their families.
    “I am committed to doing everything necessary to crack down on gun violence, including increasing support for front-line policing; stopping the revolving door on our nation’s sentencing system by introducing mandatory prison sentences; enforcing Canada’s tough gun control laws; stopping the flow of illegal guns at our borders; as well as supporting community programs for youth at risk. I will have more to say about this in the days to come.”

  • Josh

    andrew,
    i’m not some Liberal hack out to lift all responsibility off of martin. the difference between layton and harper is that layton attacked paul martin’s IDEA for a solution. harper just bluntly attacked martin, invoking a conservative government that hasn’t been in power in over 12 years. that’s not constructive, or anything remotely close to an idea, it’s just playing politics. layton is debating a solution, which i think just about everyone should be doing right now.

  • JOsh

    okay. i’m starting to think we are victims of conservative spin here.
    andrew, that was a by-the-books statement issued the day after on the conservative website. off the script, harper went on to attack martin the next day, where i take issue. i found it to be disrespectful, and i’ve said my reasons. but this post is not about stephen harper, moreso about lewis reford. are you trying to divert attention away from that?

  • Garnet

    Ianno was the sitting MP for the riding in the last Parliament; one could therefore argue that he had a legitimate and official role being there, though to be technical he isn’t an MP right now (there aren’t any). Chow, however, is neither an MP nor a city councillor at the moment. It’s difficult to find a reason for her presence that wouldn’t also apply equally to Reford. Personally I don’t have a problem with any of them being there — what might the voters make of politicians who took no interest in such grief?

  • alanTdot

    Garnet,
    there is a rather large difference between ‘being there’ to support the cause of non violence and because you have been active in creating safer municipal streets, and ‘being there’ to hand out your campaign Christmas card and whore yourself in a shameless attempt at garnering votes.
    It really isn’t hard to see the difference…

  • http://www.andrewspicer.com/ Andrew Spicer

    Josh, I’m not trying to divert anybody’s attention from anything.
    Around this blog it feels like if you don’t crap on Stephen Harper, you are assumed to be some kind of Conservative Party of Canada operative.
    I got involved in this thread when one of your commenters said “Where’s Andrew Spicer now?” as if I was someone responsible for stupid things done by Conservatives. Just because I happened to debate you on the issue in another thread.
    I happen to not be bothered by Harper’s comments on this issue. I guess you feel they are disgusting. I’m not going to change your mind on that.
    I felt it was important to get into this debate because I think that Harper’s concern for tougher sentencing will be more effective than Martin’s gun ban. But I feel like we can’t talk about that because there’s such a Harper paranoia around here.
    I guess none of this belongs in this thread, which is actually about Lewis Reford. Sorry about that.

  • Garnet

    Respectfully, Alan, I think we’re talking about matters of style here, not some vast gap between Reford and Chow. Candidates campaign; you may choose to impute only the highest motives to one and the lowest to the other, but there they both were at the same event.

  • Josh

    i don’t personally have harper paranoia. though i am very aware of spinning on the comments section here. earlier this year, i caught commenter cut-and-pasting arguments from right-wing websites, then a liberal campaigner sends me hate mail. whatever, i guess that is the nature of the comment boards…i know you’re not a conservative operative, i just wanted to get back to lewis reford. i’m sorry if i labelled you as such, because i value your input.
    speaking of which, the behaviour of reford is all relative to your definition of ‘respectful.’ i personally was put off the man when i saw him handing out cpc-issued christmas cards at the vigil.

  • alanTdot

    Great,
    I throw out a ‘where’s Andrew Spicer now’ and I get blamed for the attempted spin…
    Garnet,
    we aren’t talking about style. General common decency looks at the actions of one Lewis Redford and reveals them to be tactless.
    Perhaps you would continue to argue matters of ‘style’ if Mr Redford decided to hire Prostitutes to walk up and down the street with his campaign signs.
    After all, Candidates Campaign.

  • Dave

    Sorry Josh, but it really does appear as though you have anti-Harper paranoia.

  • Luke

    Maybe I should read some back posts… or even the comments section in their entirety, but did was the Torontoist as disgusted with Martin’s cashing in on dead teenagers, a la the boy who was shot attending his friend’s funeral some weeks ago?
    Well! They should’ve been!

  • Emilia Liz

    I clearly remember the day Jane Creba died. I was returning home from a haircut in Toronto’s Chinatown, and as I passed by the Eaton Centre, I noticed that Yonge Street was closed off and several police cars were parked nearby. A shooting had occurred, somebody said. I had half a mind to investigate the matter further, but my better judgement prevailed and I continued walking along Dundas Street. The next day more details about the crime emerged. A woman had been killed, caught in the crossfire of what appeared to be gang warfare. Her name was Jane Creba, and she was a fifteen-year-old student at Riverdale Collegiate Institute. Within a week a memorial was set up at the spot where she was shot, with hundreds of passersby leaving flowers, stuffed animals and other paraphernalia there.
    Jane Creba’s death was the 78th murder of 2005, a relatively high number compared to previous years. People wondered aloud whether Toronto was safe anymore. After all, if Ms. Creba could be shot on a busy downtown street in broad daylight while doing nothing more dangerous than looking for Boxing Day sales, anybody could be shot. Another fact that stood out was that Creba was White and her shooters were Black. Memories of the Just Desserts slaying more than a decade earlier, in which a young Greek-Canadian girl by the name of Georgina Leimonis was killed at a popular Toronto eatery during a robbery by several Black youths, came flooding back. And as in the Just Desserts incident, there was no shortage of commentary on the Creba case.
    Like vultures gnawing at a corpse, White Supremacists, not surprisingly, jumped on Ms. Creba’s death to spout off on the supposed dangers of non-White immigration to Canada. Individuals who hadn’t given a hoot about her during her lifetime suddenly acted as if she were a long-lost sister. Even American racists like the Stormfront White Nationalist Community sat up and took notice.
    But liberals of all colours weren’t above using Jane’s demise to advance their own causes either. Some blamed the actions of the young men who shot her on former Ontario Premier Mike Harris’ cutbacks to social programs. “These are the children of Mike Harris” became a familiar refrain. Racism was also proffered as an explanation. Toronto Sun columnist Rachel Giese, who is White, suspected that part of the reason for these youths’ involvement in crime was that “for their entire lives, they were made to feel worthless, that they didn’t matter and that if they died no one would hold a vigil or mourn.”
    Ms. Giese wrote as well, “Whatever side of the gun they’re on, young, poor Black men are in crisis.” Indeed, a disproportionate number of the homicides committed in Toronto in 2005 involved Blacks, both as perpetrators and as victims. Many, though by no means all, of the latter had previous criminal records. This thus begs the question: why are Blacks overrepresented in crime in comparison to their numbers in the population? The reason traditionally given by liberals – like Rachel Giese – is racism, with poverty and lack of social programs as close seconds. However, this explanation is belied by the fact that East Asians, who too have faced discrimination in Canada (the Chinese head tax, the internment of Japanese Canadians, etcetera), are on average LESS likely to engage in crime than Whites are. So while I certainly won’t deny the existence of racism in this country or the possibility it may have played some part in the Creba and Leimonis shootings, something else is clearly going on here.
    It is also an open secret that most of the “Black” crime in Toronto is committed by people from the island of Jamaica. Jamaica, as it happens, has one of the highest murder rates in the world – so much so that it’s lost favour as a tourist destination in the last twenty years or so. Globe and Mail columnist Margaret Wente put it this way: “The violent culture of Jamaica sheds far more light on Toronto’s gun-and-gang problem than [Mike] Harris’ cruel decision to shut down the Anti-Racism Secretariat.”
    Nonetheless, I can’t let Whites completely off the hook for many of the problems within the Black community. At this point, though, much of the blame lies not with the White Supremacists – whom, let me be clear, I find odious – but with White so-called “progressives.” The latter, albeit unintentionally, have set in place a series of social trends that have proven disastrous to the Black population (not that they’ve been good for Whites). I cite here the writings of a young Asian-American man named Arthur Hu. He chastises progressives for “promoting drugs, promiscuity and abdication of personal responsibility.” Take the issue of drugs. One of the men involved in the Just Desserts case was reported by witnesses to have been high on something when he fired the shot that killed Georgina Leimonis. A good number of the gang-related shootings in Toronto have involved conflicts over drug deals or dealers’ “territory.” As one poster to a website stated, some young Black men get involved in selling and distributing illegal substances because there is an eager and willing market for them – consisting primarily of upscale Whites. But who promoted the use of drugs as “cool” and “hip?” Think of Whites like Timothy “Expand Your Consciousness” Leary or the marijuana-loving glitterati of Ithaca, New York.
    I do not, by the way, support the conservatives’ “War on Drugs.” For one, I think it’s both futile and wastefully expensive, and two, in a democracy we should be free to make foolish decisions. It’s something else, though, to openly encourage people to make foolish decisions or condone their doing so. For instance, it’s perfectly within my rights to dance naked on my balcony in minus 20 Celsius weather. I would also hope that if I ever showed any inclination to do such a thing, the people who claimed to care for me would tell me how incredibly stupid I was being. So by glamourizing drugs, progressives have done Blacks (and Whites, for that matter) no favour.
    To end on a more upbeat note, some members of the Black population are taking measures to stem violence in their community. Here the Black church has a proactive role to play. Much attention was given to the visit to Toronto of Eugene Rivers, the African-American minister responsible for the “Boston miracle,” a series of faith-based programs that reduced crime rates in that city dramatically. Even before Rivers’ trip to Toronto, however, a number of Black pastors in the Jane-Finch neighbourhood had stepped forward to urge gang members to lay down their guns. It is in the hands of individuals like these, who are literally “on the ground” and who don’t necessarily subscribe to dogma of any political stripe, in which the Black community’s problems have the best chance of being resolved.

  • Tomasz Winnicki

    Emilia, are you saying that statistically Asians are less likely to engage in violence than Caucasians? If so, isn’t that a racist statement to make? Where exactly have you learned that fact?
    What kind of blame do you lay on ‘White Supremacists’ and racism for the killing of Jane Creba? How exactly are ‘White Supremacists’ and racism responsible for Jane’s death?
    FYI: Most murderous countries in the world according to NationMaster.com: http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/cri_mur_percap
    http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/cri_mur

  • Emilia Liz

    Dear Tomasz,
    Hello. I’m sorry to be so late getting back to you. I just didn’t think anybody would take the time to comment on something I wrote. So for doing so, I thank you.
    When I say Asians are statistically less likely to engage in crime than are Whites, that’s a fact. If you think facts are racist, that’s fine, but a fact is a fact. I got that statistic from a study showing that in Ontario Asians are disproportionately less likely to be incarcerated than are members of other races (a similar study for all Canada showed the same thing). Now notice I said “statistically.” That is, some Asians do commit crime; many (most, in fact) Whites do not. I even feel bad reporting this fact because of the many wonderful White men I know – my father, brother, cousins, friends – who would never even dream of breaking the law. But on AVERAGE – note I said “average” – Asians are less likely to be involved in crime than are Whites. Get that fact through your head.
    Tomacz, I didn’t blame White Supremacists for the death of Jane Creba. I just think it’s somewhat hypocritical that though when she was alive they probably didn’t give a piece of what my cats put in the litter box about her, suddenly on her death they’re acting as if she were a long-lost sister. Yes, I find White Supremactists odious; I don’t hide that. No, I don’t think they’re responsible in any way for her death, but I think their reaction to it was somewhat disgusting. I said there was a “possibility” racism might have played a role in her death, not that it actually did.
    I hope I’ve clarified myself.

  • Emilia Liz

    By the way, Tomasz, what are the statistics on murder supposed to show to me? Just curious.

  • Emilia Liz

    Sorry, I misspelled Supremacists.

  • Steve

    Re;white supremacists and jane Creba…how are the 2 related? What Moron came up with this analogy…