Today Mon Tue
It is forcast to be Chance of Snow at 10:00 PM EST on February 12, 2012
Chance of Snow
-1°/-4°
It is forcast to be Clear at 10:00 PM EST on February 13, 2012
Clear
3°/-3°
It is forcast to be Chance of Snow at 10:00 PM EST on February 14, 2012
Chance of Snow
6°/0°

8 Comments

news

Mixtape: The Chicken or L’Oeuf Argument

2005_01_07mixtape.gifQuite a kafuffle was made of the “Montreal scene” this past Sunday in the New York Times, so much so that media everywhere are clamoring to keep up with the revelation. But to those in the know, both the Times article and a similar Spin article are somewhat suspect. When Times writer David Carr describes The Dears as goth-pop, fails to identify Nicholas Diamond of the Unicorns or places commas in between the ‘yeahs’ in the Yeah Yeah Yeahs, he is either doing word-of-mouth research or just carelessly name-dropping. Carr also misses the point on the Stills – stating that Montrealers hate the Stills when really everyone hates the Stills. The real danger of the New York Times piece, however, is that Sunday readers like my father may be tempted to actually listen to Les Georges Leningrad. No, but the REAL danger is that whatever musical “scene” or community in Montreal may be ruined by trend-sniffing industry louts who read said articles and look for the next “thing.”
On the subject of the so-called Montreal scene, Mr Win Butler of Arcade Fire had this to say: “In my experience, wherever there aren’t those music industry hawks, wherever people aren’t just walking around trying to ‘make it,’ the quality of music is generally ten times higher. Then something interesting happens, and everyone gathers around, and then this crap comes out, and then it’s the new Seattle.”
The issue then arises: Who is at fault? Is it the hackish rock critics that point the herd toward these “scenes,” or is it the herd themselves? Here’s the Mixtape.
1. Pony Up! – “Shut Up and Kiss Me”
Montreal band mentioned as “hip” in the Times.
2. Republic of Safety – “the Moon”
A non-Montreal band that has not been mentioned as “hip” by the Times. Includes the best member of the Hidden Cameras.


2005_02_08montreal.gif3. The Sexy Magazines – “Take Some Time”
The Sexy Magazines are a New Yorker band that most New Yorkers hate (similar to our friends the Stills in Mtl). If Toronto had similar disdain for a local band, which would it be? A few come to mind, but we shant say who right now…
4. James Chance – “Contort Yourself”
NO, contort yourself.
5. The Harlem Shakes – “Eighteen”
More New Yorkers that sound vaguely Pixiesish.
6. Les Georges Leningrad – “Supa Doopa”
One more “hip” Montreal band. Had to do it. Except “Georges V” is arguably a better song…
Okay, so we’re off to Montreal. See you next week. Mixtape out.

Comments

  • http://boyreporter.blogspot.com Ron Nurwisah, Boy Reporter

    Yeah, I wonder what Pop Montreal is gonna be like this year considering all the hordes of musical hipster that’ll want to be part of the scene?
    Have fun in MTL!

  • pedant

    “kerfuffle”

  • http://www.gothamist.com Jen

    It is kerfuffle. But otherwise, excellent reportage and beware of the hipsters from the Lower East Side descending into your country.

  • http://www.torontoist.com Josh

    you know what, i had kerfuffle but second guessed myself at the last minute. thanks to people like pedant that will never happen again. but, in my defense, kafuffle is perfectly fine.
    kafuffle (noun): disorder, commotion; also written curfuffle, kerfuffle, gefuffle.

  • faux hipster

    do hordes of musical hipsters really read the times and spin? my guess is no.

  • http://www.torontoist.com Josh

    music hipsters consider chuck klosterman a god among men. how do you think they find out the newest white stripes gossip?

  • David

    stop hating on the stills if anything cause the killers don’t like them. hopefully this turns into the next biggie/tupac beef.

  • http://www.torontoist.com Josh

    as a former montrealer, i feel it is my duty to diss those stills guys at every opportunity. not really, but they get on my nerves. i’ve seen them twice. each time they drained all excitment out of the room with their annoying drone, and then after acted like something that rhymes with kricks. what’s the big deal with those guys? as for that other “band”, i would prefer it if we did not talk about them ever again.